Literature DB >> 31557221

Relative importance of gene effects for nitrogen-use efficiency in popcorn.

Adriano Dos Santos1, Antônio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior1, Roberto Fritsche-Neto2, Samuel Henrique Kamphorst1, Fernando Rafael Alves Ferreira1, José Francisco Teixeira do Amaral3, Janieli Maganha Silva Vivas1, Pedro Henrique Araújo Diniz Santos1, Valter Jário de Lima1, Shahid Khan1, Kátia Fabiane Medeiros Schmitt1, Jhean Torres Leite1, Divino Rosa Dos Santos Junior1, Rosimeire Barboza Bispo1, Talles de Oliveira Santos1, Uéliton Alves de Oliveira1, Lauro José Moreira Guimarães4, Oscar Rodriguez5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of additive and non-additive genes on the efficiency of nitrogen (N) use and N responsiveness in inbred popcorn lines. The parents, hybrids and reciprocal crosses were evaluated in a 10x10 triple lattice design at two sites and two levels of N availability. To establish different N levels in the two experiments, fertilization was carried out at sowing, according to soil analysis reports. However, for the experiments with ideal nitrogen availability, N was sidedressed according to the crop requirement, whereas for the N-poor experiments sidedressing consisted of 30% of that applied in the N-rich environment. Two indices were evaluated, the Harmonic Mean of the Relative Performance (HMRP) and Agronomic Efficiency under Low Nitrogen Availability (AELN), both based on grain yield at both N levels. Both additive and non-additive gene effects were important for selection for N-use efficiency. Moreover, there was allelic complementarity between the lines and a reciprocal effect for N-use efficiency, indicating the importance of the choice of the parents used as male or female. The best hybrids were obtained from inbred popcorn lines with contrasting N-use efficiency and N responsiveness.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31557221      PMCID: PMC6762054          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Maize is one of the most important agricultural commodities at all over the world and its production consumes almost one-fifth of all nitrogen produced. In this context, excessive applications of N fertilizers may harm the environment, causing for example soil acidification and water and air pollution [1,2]. Since the plants can take only up 30 to 40% of the applied N. Thus, over 60% of the N in the soil generally is lost by leaching, surface runoff, denitrification, volatilization, and microbial consumption. This is an indication that more research is needed to increase maize yields with lower environmental impact. From this perspective, one option is to develop the N-use efficient (NUE) cultivars. It is well known that nitrogen use efficient is available for the genotype keeps or increases its grain quantity when low N availability occurs [3]. The Nitrogen responsiveness can be observed when a given genotype obtains higher average grain yield in the environment with good N availability than in the environment with nitrogen stress. During previous study, Kant et al. [4] estimated that a 1% increase in NUE of crops could save US$ 1.1 billion annually. Therefore, the development of NUE cultivars is required to minimize losses of applied N as well as to decrease environmental pollution, reduce inputs and consequently, save production costs. It is noteworthy that, in spite of all breeding activities, the maize germplasm still has wide genetic variability for N-use efficiency that has not been exploited [4,5]. However, the development of NUE maize cultivars is a great challenge due to the genetic complexity and strong interaction with the environment. Thus, information on the genetic control of this trait, at contrasting levels of N availability, would be useful for crop researchers to choose the breeding method for obtaining NUE efficient cultivars. In this context, previous studies investigated the genetic control in maize, to identify genomic regions and candidate genes related to N-use efficiency [1,6-8]. On the other hand, the magnitude of additive and non-additive effects on the trait control is not yet well understood. Considering all these points, a diallel analysis is a potential tool for the identification of desirable parents with information about the nature and magnitude of the genetic effects controlling the trait, since the general combining ability (GCA), as is well-known, provides information about the performance of additive genes, while the specific combining ability (SCC) refers to dominant and epistatic genes. Diallel analysis has been used in studies on the inheritance and genetic control of important traits for a number of crop species [9-12]. Given the above, the goals of the present study were to investigate the genetic effects and the inheritance controlling the use efficiency and responsiveness of nitrogen in popcorn, allowing to analyze the relative importance of additive, non-additive and reciprocal effects in the control genetic characteristics.

Material and methods

Experimental conditions and genotypes

The experiments were carried out at two levels of N availability, low and optimum, corresponding to 32 and 128 kg ha-1 nitrogen, respectively and at two sites: Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ, at the experimental station of the Colégio Estadual Agrícola Antônio Sarlo (21° 42' 48" S, 41° 20' 38" W; 14 m asl) and at 60 m altitude, with an average annual temperature of 22.5° C and an average annual precipitation of 1041 mm (Fig 1) and soil classified as Ultisol Yellow Distrocoeso and at the Experimental Station of Itaocara-RJ (21° 38' 50" S, 42° 03' 46" W; 58 m asl), representing, respectively, the North and Northwestern regions of the State of Rio de Janeiro. The climate in both environments is tropical humid (Aw), according to the Köppen classification and soil classified as Red-Yellow Latosol. Soil chemical properties listed in S1 Table. In both experiments there was supplementary irrigation, in which the water slides were applied according to the water requirement of the crop.
Fig 1

Pluviometric precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature, relative humidity during the experimental development.

Campos dos Goytacazes (A1, A2 e A3), Itaocara (B1, B2, B3), RJ– 2015.

Pluviometric precipitation, minimum and maximum temperature, relative humidity during the experimental development.

Campos dos Goytacazes (A1, A2 e A3), Itaocara (B1, B2, B3), RJ– 2015. The genotypes were derived from crosses in a complete diallel mating design with reciprocal crosses, among 10 S7 lines having contrasting N use (S2 Table). The lines L61, L75 and L80 were previously classified as inefficient in N use and nonresponsive to N (INR), lines P2, P6 and P7 were classified as N-use efficient and N-responsive (ER) and lines L54, L59, L76, and L77 were classified as intermediate in N-use efficiency and N responsiveness [13]. Thus, 45 hybrid combinations and their respective reciprocals were obtained, resulting in a total of 90 hybrid combinations. These 90 hybrid combinations were evaluated, together with the 10 S parents, in a 10x10 triple lattice design in which each experimental unit consisted of one 4.2 m row with a row spacing of 0.60 m and plant spacing of 0.25 m. Two seeds per hill were sown and 21 days after emergence, thinned to one plant per hill, resulting in a stand of 18 plants per plot. Harvesting was done manually in December 2015. Minimal set data (S3 Table) is being shown in support information.

Nitrogen availability

In order to distinguish the N level of the experiments, the following strategy was adopted: for experiments with optimal N availability, fertilization was applied at sowing according to the soil analysis, consisting of 32 kg N ha-1, and side dressing, for N supplementation, was performed with 128 kg N ha-1, split in two applications, in the stages V4 and V6 respectively, using urea as N source. For the experiments with low N availability (LN), fertilization at planting was similar to that of the experiment with optimal availability (HN) and side dressing consisted of only 30% of that applied in the environment with optimal N supply. The sowing fertilization of both nitrogen availabilities (down and ideal) constituted of the 32 kg N ha-1 N, 85 kg P2O5 ha-1 and 0 kg K2O ha-1 in Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, RJ.

Classification of the genotypes as to NUE

At harvest, the grain yield of each plot was estimated, adjusted to 13% moisture and extrapolated to kg ha-1. Two indices based on grain yield (kg ha-1) were estimated to quantify N-use efficiency of each genotype at low and high N availability. Initially, the index proposed by Wu et al. [14] was estimated, and later modified for the agronomic efficiency (AELN), according to the expression (01): where AELNij is the agronomic efficiency at low N availability of line i in replication j; GY(HN)lj is the grain yield under optimal N availability (phenotypic value) of line i in replication j; GY(LN)ir is the grain yield at low N availability (phenotypic value) of line i in replication j. Then the Harmonic Mean of the Relative Performance (HMRP) was estimated according to the expression (02) [15]: where, HMRP is the Harmonic Mean of Relative Performance of Genotype Values of line i in replication j; GY is the grain yield in the environment with ideal N availability (phenotypic value) of line i in the replication j; GY is grain yield in the environment of low N availability (phenotypic value) of line i in replication j; is the overall mean of the high-N environment; is the overall mean of the low-N environment.

Statistical analysis

The combining ability was analyzed based on Method I of Griffing [16], in which the p2 combinations are evaluated, including parents, hybrids and their reciprocals. The genotype effects were considered fixed, based on the expression (03): where: Y: is mean value of hybrid combination ij; m: the general constant inherent to the observations; g and g: are effects of the general combining ability of the ij order parents, respectively; s: is the effect of specific combining ability for crosses between the ith and jth order genders; r: is the reciprocal effect that measures the differences provided by parent i, or j, when used as male or female in cross ij; e: is the effect of environment k; ge and ge: are effects of the interaction between the general combining ability of the parents i and j, respectively, with environment k; se: is the effect of the interaction between the specific combining ability between the parents i and j at environment k; re: is the interaction between the reciprocal effect and environment k; ɛ: is the mean experimental error associated with observation of order ij, with NID ~ (0, σ2). The mean dominance degree (MDD) was estimated by the expression: MDD = 2σ2CGC/(2σ2 CGC + σ2CEC), proposed by Baker [17], where 2σ2 GCA is the quadratic form (analogous to the components of variance, but referring to the fixed effect) derived from the effect of the mean square of the GCA and σ2SCA is the quadratic form of the effects of the SCA. The analyses were performed using SAS macro “Diallel-SAS05”, as described by Zhang et al. [18].

Results

The genotype effect was highly significant (p < 0.01) for all traits analyzed, evidencing the existence of genetic variability for these traits in the studied population. This indicates the possibility of success in the selection of superior genotypes for N-use efficiency, with this base population in a breeding program. The same result can be observed for general and specific combining ability and for the reciprocal effect (REC), in which all traits were significant at (p < 0.01) (Table 1).
Table 1

Combined diallel analysis for agronomic efficiency at low N availability (AELN), harmonic mean of the relative performance (HMRP) and grain yield (GY) in popcorn genotypes.

Source of VariationDFAELNHMRPGY
CamposItaocara
Replication (Environment)4432448.60.0011620845.0079168.7
Environment (E)181968638.90.001574294487.2**79222167.2**
Genotype (G)993328381.7**0.5299**975235.9**2314001.2**
    GCA96892761.26**1.4393**8713567.9**10746365.92**
    SCA453584582.2**0.6213**3213312.2**8446332.37**
    Reciprocal (REC)452359305.35**0.2567**1526251.4**3016353.49**
        Maternal (M)94676632.91**0.9409**5527482.9**6873211.29**
Non-maternal (NM)361779973.46**0.0856**525943.59**2052139.04**
G X E991633930.3**0.1190**968981.02**965416.2**
    GCA x E92329523.58**0.3143**614243.65*318340.39**
    SCA x E451277566.42**0.0921**160757.96*895005.47**
    REC x E451851175.61**0.1068**167055.06*1165242.15**
        M x E92613974.11**0.1853**226979.11*1520772.94**
        NM x E361660475.98**0.0872**152074.04*1076359.45**
Error396123510.50.0037519451.051665.8
MDD-0.790.820.840.72

*: significant at the 5% probability level by the F test

**: significant at the 1% probability level by the F test. GY: kg ha-1.

*: significant at the 5% probability level by the F test **: significant at the 1% probability level by the F test. GY: kg ha-1. For the indices AELN and HMRP, the interactions GCA x E, SCA x E, REC x E, M x E, and NM x E were significant. In this case, the environment (E) consisted of sites, indicating that the effects observed in each environment were not consistent, in other words, a parent with high additive effects at one site may not have the same superiority at another. The effects of the interactions GCA x E, SCA x E, REC x E, M x E, and NM x E were also significant for grain yield, although it is worth mentioning that in this study, the environments were represented by the different N availability levels. In this way, the performance of parents (ĝi) and crosses (ŝij) should be observed in each environment, to ensure the selection or breeding of genotypes for specific conditions. The magnitude of the mean degree of dominance (MDD) ranged from 0.72 to 0.84 for grain yield in Itaocara and for AELN. This result can be corroborated by the higher values of the average squares of the overall combining ability over specific capacity. Estimates of the GCA effects provide information about the number of additive gene effects. Thus, the parents with highest ĝi values are the most promising for breeding programs selecting for N-use efficiency. In this way, the parents L59, L61, P2, P6, and P7 stood out in the different environments and in the mean of the environments, and although the GCA x E interaction was significant, the ĝi estimates of these parents were positive for AELN and HMRP (Table 2).
Table 2

Effect of the general combining ability (ĝi) on the agronomic efficiency at low N availability (AELN), harmonic mean of the relative performance of the predicted genetic values (HMRP) and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AELN) and standard deviation (SD) of popcorn genotypes evaluated at two locations in the 2015/2016 growing season.

ParentAELNHMRP
CamposItaocaraMeanCamposItaocaraMean
L54-279.94166.09-56.93-0.150.00-0.08
L59538.176.58272.370.220.010.11
L61113.0683.9498.500.150.020.09
L75-273.03-482.99-378.01-0.19-0.18-0.18
L76-432.56-170.31-301.44-0.060.00-0.03
L77-127.71111.77-7.970.000.050.03
L80-220.12-276.72-248.42-0.18-0.14-0.16
P2340.41177.58259.000.080.060.07
P6188.94121.63155.290.010.040.02
P7152.79262.44207.610.120.140.13
SD35.8549.38-0,00770.0072-

About grain yield, the parents P7, L61 and L59, in Campos dos Goytacazes, and P2, P6 and P7, in Itaocara, had the biggest ĝi effects in low and high N levels, presenting the efficiency of these parents under low N availability and responsivity. Parent P7 had both high N responsiveness and N-use efficiency, and parent P2 was also highly NUE (Table 3).

About grain yield, the parents P7, L61 and L59, in Campos dos Goytacazes, and P2, P6 and P7, in Itaocara, had the biggest ĝi effects in low and high N levels, presenting the efficiency of these parents under low N availability and responsivity. Parent P7 had both high N responsiveness and N-use efficiency, and parent P2 was also highly NUE (Table 3).
Table 3

Effect of the general combining ability (ĝi) on popcorn grain yield and standard deviation (SD) evaluated at high and low N availability in Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, in the 2015/2016 growing season.

ParentsCampos dos GoytacazesItaocaraMean
High NLow NHigh NLow N
L54-312.80-277.46-124.5076.00-159.69
L59377.37443.7472.158.11225.34
L61325.92227.8759.5464.47169.45
L75-408.94-318.43-620.75-537.38-471.37
L7691.53-229.8239.23-51.28-37.58
L7750.29-39.24131.33140.2570.66
L80-388.17-291.73-436.39-402.17-379.62
P267.48213.89161.41197.79160.14
P650.2976.69177.53124.8182.19
P7247.59194.48540.46379.40340.48
SD15.0018.9825.0830.25-
It should be noted that parent L61, considered N-use inefficient, proved NUE at both locations and N levels, and it can be inferred that for an accurate selection of NUE genotypes, apart from selection per se, the estimates of ĝ and ŝ should be used, since selection per se of a genotype provides no information about the GCA and SCA. An ideal parent for breeding should be highly N responsive and highly NUE under low N availability. The hybrid combinations L59 x L80, L61 x L77, L54 x L76, L59 x P2, and L77 x P6 had the highest ŝ effects on AELN (Table 4). Interestingly, parents L77, L54 and L80 had negative ĝ estimates, allowing to conclude that the ŝ effects of these crosses expressed allelic complementation. These results from the difference in allelic frequency between the parents (divergence) and from dominance effects [10], represented by the parents L59, L61 and P6, which had a relatively high mean ĝ value for AELN.
Table 4

Effect of specific combining ability (ŝij) on the agronomic efficiency under low nitrogen availability (AELN) and standard deviation (SD) of popcorn genotypes evaluated in Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, in the 2015/2016 growing season.

GenotypesCamposItaocaraMeanGenotypesCamposItaocaraMean
L54 x L59249.37711.18480.27L61 x P7470.62-106.23182.20
L54 x L6123.89278.16151.03L75 x L76-340.72-315.20-327.96
L54 x L75-56.63-270.13-163.38L75 x L77451.80-333.4459.18
L54 x L76950.07441.60695.83L75 x L80275.45492.03383.74
L54 x L77-118.96425.62153.33L75 x P2-510.80921.06205.13
L54 x L80212.17466.16339.16L75 x P665.14370.36217.75
L54 x P2-217.54110.02-53.76L75 x P7176.41170.45173.43
L54 x P6-271.23130.97-70.13L76 x L77-85.88623.73268.93
L54 x P7-198.80-142.62-170.71L76 x L80-119.38-121.78-120.58
L59 x L61-63.37-62.27-62.82L76 x P2-44.33449.93202.80
L59 x L7520.58-409.58-194.50L76 x P6-128.75542.85207.05
L59 x L76-136.30-74.83-105.57L76 x P7481.29-132.90174.20
L59 x L7728.41-51.79-11.69L77 x L80-167.20-234.81-201.01
L59 x L80232.521934.961083.74L77 x P2332.20-609.29-138.54
L59 x P2923.92337.99630.95L77 x P6198.24885.91542.07
L59 x P61035.66-115.77459.94L77 x P7-52.08584.25266.09
L59 x P7-244.07-194.20-219.14L80 x P2276.37-595.94-159.79
L61 x L75485.11393.01439.06L80 x P6-298.78-1234.48-766.63
L61 x L76156.35350.78253.56L80 x P7257.7782.27170.02
L61 x L77616.33883.64749.99P2 x P6609.47190.58400.03
L61 x L80-244.58-10.05-127.31P2 x P7-410.53-415.25-412.89
L61 x P2131.00-206.48-37.74P6 x P7-245.96-880.53-563.25
L61 x P6-198.16323.4262.63----
SD108.21149.05--108.21149.05-
Similarly to AELN, used as a per se index of simultaneous selection, HMRP is an index that takes high-yielding genotypes in all environments into account and consequently enables the selection of productive genotypes under optimal and low N availability. The best crosses with the highest mean ŝ effects were L54 x L76, L59 x L77, L77 x P7, L61 x L77, and L59 x P7 (Table 5).
Table 5

Effect of specific combining ability (ŝ) for the harmonic mean of relative performance (HMRP) and standard deviation (SD), of popcorn genotypes evaluated in Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, in the 2015/2016 growing season.

GenotypesCamposItaocaraMeanGenotypesCamposItaocaraMean
L54 x L59-0.1460.133-0.006L61 x P70.030-0.061-0.015
L54 x L610.0680.2350.152L75 x L76-0.248-0.104-0.176
L54 x L750.053-0.0430.005L75 x L770.0730.0190.046
L54 x L760.3680.1620.265L75 x L800.0330.0420.038
L54 x L770.0370.0320.035L75 x P2-0.0720.026-0.023
L54 x L800.1260.2020.164L75 x P60.0980.2240.161
L54 x P2-0.0490.1560.054L75 x P7-0.0210.0700.024
L54 x P6-0.0220.1390.059L76 x L770.1400.0340.087
L54 x P7-0.082-0.270-0.176L76 x L800.0830.1450.114
L59 x L610.194-0.0850.055L76 x P2-0.0010.2390.119
L59 x L750.2140.0710.142L76 x P60.0700.0770.073
L59 x L760.149-0.0580.046L76 x P7-0.0090.0970.044
L59 x L770.0840.3710.228L77 x L80-0.239-0.265-0.252
L59 x L800.1090.0510.080L77 x P20.2290.0040.117
L59 x P2-0.0220.0950.036L77 x P60.0860.2040.145
L59 x P60.115-0.0650.025L77 x P70.0170.3950.206
L59 x P70.2420.1050.174L80 x P2-0.060-0.143-0.101
L61 x L750.1230.1710.147L80 x P60.039-0.063-0.012
L61 x L760.0950.2460.171L80 x P70.0900.2120.151
L61 x L770.3090.0840.197P2 x P60.0890.0680.078
L61 x L80-0.0810.1270.023P2 x P70.0320.0060.019
L61 x P20.1300.0540.092P6 x P7-0.213-0.207-0.210
L61 x P60.065-0.072-0.003----
SD0.0230.021--0.0230.021-
In Campos dos Goytacazes, the highest ŝ effects were observed in the combinations L54 x L76, L61 x L77, L59 x P7, and L77 x P2. The ŝ effect of these crosses was high in the presence and absence of nitrogen, showing that these genotypes were NUE and N responsive. In Itaocara, we can observe that the highest values of ŝ were for the combinations L59 x L77, L77 x P7, L61 x L76, L54 x L61 and L75 x P6, both for environments with high and low nitrogen availability (Tables 6 and 7). The ŝij effect for the hybrids L54 x L76, L54 x L80 and others indicated deviations from what was expected, based on the GCA of the parents L54 and L76, evidencing non-additive gene effects [9].
Table 6

Effect of the specific combining ability (ŝ) on grain yield and standard deviation (SD) of popcorn genotypes evaluated under optimal and low N availability in Campos dos Goytacazes, in the 2015/2016 growing season.

GenotypesHigh NLow NMeanGenotypesHigh NLow NMean
L54 x L59-439.18-96.93-268.05L61 x P7-85.11198.9056.90
L54 x L61174.7488.12131.43L75 x L76-549.55-412.83-481.19
L54 x L75158.4541.2399.84L75 x L7728.60242.75135.67
L54 x L76482.81794.32638.57L75 x L809.32130.3869.85
L54 x L77198.64-6.5596.04L75 x P2-3.50-260.98-132.24
L54 x L80262.32220.68241.50L75 x P6219.26146.86183.06
L54 x P2-40.78-132.90-86.84L75 x P7-52.6724.83-13.92
L54 x P624.24-113.95-44.85L76 x L77453.40120.55286.98
L54 x P7-133.61-167.89-150.75L76 x L80271.3354.13162.73
L59 x L61500.82216.79358.81L76 x P2-89.93-1.71-45.82
L59 x L75486.32276.45381.39L76 x P6192.2242.77117.50
L59 x L76492.05123.95308.00L76 x P7-106.51143.6318.56
L59 x L77134.87127.95131.41L77 x L80-545.30-350.21-447.76
L59 x L80161.35229.91195.63L77 x P2419.23405.13412.18
L59 x P2-283.59271.57-6.01L77 x P6117.80182.37150.09
L59 x P614.41468.29241.35L77 x P773.580.9337.25
L59 x P7672.22212.14442.18L80 x P2-200.8015.04-92.88
L61 x L75143.10319.07231.08L80 x P6172.60-52.1060.25
L61 x L76163.38172.23167.80L80 x P7106.87203.56155.21
L61 x L77535.05593.55564.30P2 x P648.91310.76179.83
L61 x L80-99.24-184.64-141.94P2 x P7194.57-100.6946.94
L61 x P2291.28202.51246.90P6 x P7-475.14-337.03-406.08
L61 x P6266.565.92136.24----
SD45.2757.31--45.2757.31-
Table 7

Effect of specific combining ability (ŝ) on grain yield and standard deviation (SD) of popcorn genotypes evaluated under high and low N availability in Itaocara, in the 2015/2016 growing season.

GenotypesHigh NLow NMeanGenotypesHigh NLow NMean
L54 x L59234.50561.81398.15L61 x P7-342.47-141.84-242.16
L54 x L61915.33587.39751.36L75 x L76-381.93-324.80-353.36
L54 x L75-56.23-188.20-122.21L75 x L77309.60-106.43101.58
L54 x L76532.24497.24514.74L75 x L80-108.80285.2588.23
L54 x L77-50.87237.5193.32L75 x P2-167.46384.05108.30
L54 x L80723.42584.24653.83L75 x P6784.16608.21696.18
L54 x P2671.67353.94512.81L75 x P7153.04228.96191.00
L54 x P6638.77304.21471.49L76 x L77-60.97304.66121.84
L54 x P7-1090.98-613.58-852.28L76 x L80779.83233.05506.44
L59 x L61-238.05-200.48-219.26L76 x P2931.15650.00790.58
L59 x L75566.63-29.82268.41L76 x P639.78377.66208.72
L59 x L76-315.33-133.00-224.16L76 x P7607.42120.44363.93
L59 x L771789.23704.151246.69L77 x L80-1212.17-611.20-911.68
L59 x L80-520.37806.09142.86L77 x P2406.81-248.1079.36
L59 x P2164.18346.55255.36L77 x P6461.98765.02613.50
L59 x P6-449.36-137.63-293.49L77 x P71498.551027.791263.17
L59 x P7561.21134.03347.62L80 x P2-523.40-489.22-506.31
L61 x L75751.14468.34609.74L80 x P6820.40-668.8175.79
L61 x L76984.01625.16804.58L80 x P7941.77455.69698.73
L61 x L7713.41504.66259.03P2 x P698.97230.12164.55
L61 x L80478.30267.58372.94P2 x P7252.85-154.5449.16
L61 x P2262.8141.85152.33P6 x P7-647.84-742.26-695.05
L61 x P6-237.02-66.42-151.72----
SD75.7091.32--75.7091.32-

Discussion

The effects of GCA (ĝi) on the additive effects or frequency of favorable alleles for N-use efficiency and the SCA (ŝij), which are related to the non-additive gene effects (dominance and epistasis) or effects of intragenic and intergenic complementation. The significance for the effects of ĝi indicate that at least one parent differs from the others in terms of the number of favorable additive effect genes. The significance for ŝij indicate the existence of allelic complementation among the parents with loci containing some degree of dominance. In general, for grain production in the maize crop, the non-additive genetic effects such as the dominance are prevalent, for example [19]. The results show that the additive effect presented bigger contribution to the expression of characters. As the additive effects are essential in the predictability of genetic expression of quantitative characters, this result makes it possible to obtain superior populations for NUE, using intrapopulational breeding methods. It should also be noted that the significance of REC influences the estimation of genetic effects. The reciprocal effect can be attributed to cytoplasmic genetic factors or the interaction between nuclear genes and the effects of cytoplasmic genes [20]. This shows how important an appropriate choice of the female parent is. This reciprocal effect may be related to processes of N metabolism, e.g., photosynthesis, in which extra-nuclear genes are important for the formation of the photosynthetic apparatus of the chloroplasts [20]. Thus, it is advisable to use NUE genotypes as female parents in the crossing blocks. The observed interactions between general, specific combining ability and reciprocal effect with environments for all variables, allows us to suggest that the selection of NUE genotypes, based on grain yield, should be environment-specific rather than based on the mean performance, since the alleles that control the trait expression under low nutrient supply are partially different from those that control the same trait under ideal nutrient supply [21]. This implies that grain yield at low N availability involves not only the genes expressed under ideal N availability, but that other genes are also expressed or silenced [22]. This difference in gene expression was clearly observed in the studies of Gallais and Hirel [7], Zheng et al. [23] and Liu et al. [22], describing a differentiated expression of genetic variability in maize at low and optimal N levels, because different Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) were found for these environmental conditions. This difference in QTL number between the two N levels may reflect differences in the sensitivity of the studied variables and differences in the genotype responses to environments [24]. Therefore, these QTLs may be useful to raise the productivity of new genotypes, by combining yield-related QTLs expressed at low N availability levels with QTLs for N-use efficiency identified in low-N environments. Based on the MDD, conclusions can be drawn about the type of genetic action related to the genetic control of the trait. Mean degrees of dominance close to unity suggest that the SCA effect is not predominant and that the hybrid performance can be predicted from the mean ĝi values of the parents [16]. Consequently, additive genetic variance is more important than the effects of dominance for N-use efficiency in popcorn. Nevertheless, non-additive effects should not be disregarded, since they also have a certain influence on trait expression. This implies that artificial selection for plants with the desirable traits will possibly result in progenies with superior performance [25], because in case of additive gene effects, the mean of the parents is equal to the mean of F1, F2 and so on [10]. This result confirms literature reports, citing additive effects as the most relevant for N-use efficiency components [26,27]. One of the reasons that may be related to the superiority of the expression of the gene effects responsible for the efficiency in nitrogen use is the choice of the parents in the crossing blocks, since they can be used as inbred lines, thus presenting a narrow genetic basis or even open pollinated genotypes, which exhibit a broad genetic basis [28]. Therefore, it is evident that each parent may contribute differently to the crossing blocks, since they will have more or less frequency of favorable alleles, providing contrasting results in relation to the predominant type of gene action for a given trait. We can also mention the genetic distance between parents, because this distancing interferes with the genetic effects, as it is one of the components used for the estimation of heterosis. Therefore, it is evident the importance of obtaining information of the genetic effects related to nitrogen use efficiency in popcorn. However, caution should be exercised when selecting for N-use efficiency based on grain yield only, since non-additive effects are known as relevant for grain yield control at the different N levels [29,30]. Therefore, both additive and non-additive effects should be taken into consideration. In this way, different methods for the selection of parents of new cultivars can be explored. However, among the breeding methods, interpopulation reciprocal recurrent selection is highlighted as a particularly promising option, for exploiting both the additive and dominance genetic variance. A similar reaction was observed between the best crosses for AELN and HMRP. This finding may be related to the fact that the AELN index is mainly used for the selection of high-yielding genotypes under low N availability [13] whereas, according to Resende [14], index HMRP leads to simultaneous selection for stability and adaptability. In other words, it can be used for the selection of genotypes with above-average yield means under ideal and stress conditions. The hybrids L61 x L76 and L61 x L77 combine a parent with intermediate N-use efficiency and N responsiveness (L76 and L77) with an inefficient one (L61), while hybrid L80 x P7 combines an efficient (P7) with an inefficient parent (L80) (Tables 6 and 7). These results demonstrate the occurrence of allelic complementation among these parents. Two parents with high ĝ do not always result in a higher ŝ, as observed for cross L61 x P7, since this depends on satisfactory allelic complementation and dominance [10]. It is rather uncommon to observe two parents with low ĝ estimates resulting in a high ŝ estimate. However, it should be noted that the ŝ estimates of the hybrids L54 x L76 and L54 x L80 were high in Campos dos Goytacazes and Itaocara, respectively. Among the evaluated parents, P7 and L59 can be considered very efficient per se. Since an ideal parent should have a high ĝ effect and participate in crosses with high ŝ, these parents can be considered promising in terms of N responsiveness, since both have high ĝ estimates and participate in the crosses with highest ŝ effects in the N-rich environment. For N-use efficiency, parent P7 is the most promising, for having highest ĝ and participating in the cross with highest ŝ in the N-poor environment.

Conclusions

The partial dominance controls the efficiency of using N. Thus, the additive effects are the most important, but non-additive effects are relevant for the traits, as well. For proper reflexes, extrachromosomal genes may influence the expression of NUE. Based on this, the selection of female genotypes with higher NUE enables more productive hybrids. For better grain yield at low N availability, genes can be expressed or silenced. The grain yield is associated with non-additive effects at different levels of N. In this case, the selection for the trait can be made from genotypes where the average yield is above the average under ideal and stress conditions. The interpopulation recurrent selection is the best option to explore both additive and dominance effects expressed in the studied traits. The hybrids L61 x L76 and L61 x L77 were the most efficient in the use of nitrogen, while the parents P7 and L59 were considered the most efficient among the studied and tend to generate more productive hybrids.

Soil chemical properties of experimental areas in Itaocara and Campos dos Goytacazes, in the layers 0–10 and 10–20 cm.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Characterization of the diallel parents in terms of population structure, origin, climate adaptation, nitrogen use efficiency, cycle and susceptibility (S) and resistance (R) to B. maydis and E. turcicum.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Minimal set data.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency.

Authors:  Surya Kant; Yong-Mei Bi; Steven J Rothstein
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 2.  An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize.

Authors:  A Gallais; B Hirel
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 3.  Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production?

Authors:  Allen G Good; Ashok K Shrawat; Douglas G Muench
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under abiotic stress: where do we stand?

Authors:  Nicholas C Collins; François Tardieu; Roberto Tuberosa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Can genetic variability for nitrogen metabolism in the developing ear of maize be exploited to improve yield?

Authors:  Rafael A Cañas; Isabelle Quilleré; André Gallais; Bertrand Hirel
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands.

Authors:  J H Guo; X J Liu; Y Zhang; J L Shen; W X Han; W F Zhang; P Christie; K W T Goulding; P M Vitousek; F S Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genetic variation for N-remobilization and postsilking N-uptake in a set of maize recombinant inbred lines. 3. QTL detection and coincidences.

Authors:  M Coque; A Martin; J B Veyrieras; B Hirel; A Gallais
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China.

Authors:  Xuejun Liu; Ying Zhang; Wenxuan Han; Aohan Tang; Jianlin Shen; Zhenling Cui; Peter Vitousek; Jan Willem Erisman; Keith Goulding; Peter Christie; Andreas Fangmeier; Fusuo Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE): elucidated mechanisms, mapped genes and gene networks in maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  Shabir H Wani; Roshni Vijayan; Mukesh Choudhary; Anuj Kumar; Abbu Zaid; Vishal Singh; Pardeep Kumar; Jeshima Khan Yasin
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2021-12-22

2.  Revealing the differential protein profiles behind the nitrogen use efficiency in popcorn (Zea mays var. everta).

Authors:  Shahid Khan; Vitor Batista Pinto; Antônio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior; Gabriel Moreno Bernardo Gonçalves; Caio Cézar Guedes Corrêa; Fernando Rafael Alves Ferreira; Guilherme Augusto Rodrigues de Souza; Eliemar Campostrini; Marta Simone Mendonça Freitas; Marlene Evangelista Vieira; Talles de Oliveira Santos; Valter Jário de Lima; Samuel Henrique Kamphorst; José Francisco Teixeira do Amaral; Freddy Mora-Poblete; Gonçalo Apolinário de Souza Filho; Vanildo Silveira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Additive and Non-Additive Effects on the Control of Key Agronomic Traits in Popcorn Lines under Contrasting Phosphorus Conditions.

Authors:  Talles de Oliveira Santos; Fábio Tomaz de Oliveira; Antônio Teixeira do Amaral Junior; Janeo Eustáquio de Almeida Filho; Rosimeire Barboza Bispo; Marta Simone Mendonça de Freitas; José Francisco Teixeira do Amaral; Samuel Henrique Kamphorst; Valter Jário de Lima; Flávia Nicácio Viana; Guilherme Ferreira Pena; Pedro Henrique Araújo Diniz Santos; Wallace de Paula Bernado; Messias Gonzaga Pereira; Jurandi Gonçalves de Oliveira; Ricardo Enrique Bressan-Smith; Roberto Dos Santos Trindade
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.