Literature DB >> 31556829

Navigating the Wild West of Medication Adherence Reporting in Specialty Pharmacy.

Scott L Canfield1, Autumn Zuckerman2, Rebekah H Anguiano3, Jacob A Jolly2, Josh DeClercq4, Molly Wascher1, Leena Choi4, Stacy Knox5, David G Mitchell5.   

Abstract

Estimating medication adherence through the use of pharmacy claims-based adherence calculations such as medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) plays a significant role in specialty pharmacy practice. Although MPR and PDC are frequently used in clinical practice, calculation methodologies vary, making meaningful comparisons of adherence rates difficult. In addition, MPR and PDC are increasingly used by insurance companies, pharmacies, accrediting bodies, and drug manufacturers to demonstrate quality differences or clinical benefit across the specialty pharmacy industry. Therefore, recognizing the source and effect of calculation variability is necessary to fully understand reported adherence results. This article highlights the challenges in standardizing adherence methodologies, minimum methodology considerations that should be reported with MPR and PDC results, and key elements to consider when interpreting and applying adherence results. Further, recommendations are provided to promote a more consistent description of calculation methods and to aid pharmacies in adherence measure analysis, interpretation, and application to practice, with a focus on specialty pharmacy programs. A detailed description of methodology as outlined in this article must be provided to ensure reproducibility, external validation, and scientific rigor. In the absence of standardization, specialty pharmacies should be prudent in their use of adherence calculations as a clinical benchmarking tool or comparative quality indicator with outside organizations. Furthermore, specialty pharmacies should consider using current adherence measure calculations to identify and provide targeted interventions to patients with potential adherence problems and strive to better demonstrate ties between adherence measures and direct clinical and cost outcomes. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported the writing of this article. Anguiano is a speaker and research consultant for United Therapeutics. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31556829     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.10.1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  10 in total

1.  Pharmacist Interventions to Improve Specialty Medication Adherence: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Amanda M Kibbons; Megan Peter; Josh DeClercq; Leena Choi; Jacob Bell; Jacob Jolly; Elizabeth Cherry; Bassel Alhashemi; Nisha B Shah; Autumn D Zuckerman
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2020-09-21

2.  Pharmacist Interventions to Improve Specialty Medication Adherence: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Amanda M Kibbons; Megan Peter; Josh DeClercq; Leena Choi; Jacob Bell; Jacob Jolly; Elizabeth Cherry; Bassel Alhashemi; Nisha B Shah; Autumn D Zuckerman
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2020-12

3.  Baseline hemoglobin A1c and risk of statin-induced diabetes: results of Veterans Affairs Database analysis.

Authors:  Anna P Ziganshina; Darren E Gemoets; Laurence S Kaminsky; Aidar R Gosmanov
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2022-01

4.  Estimating proportion of days covered (PDC) using real-world online medicine suppliers' datasets.

Authors:  David Prieto-Merino; Amy Mulick; Craig Armstrong; Helen Hoult; Scott Fawcett; Lina Eliasson; Sarah Clifford
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2021-12-29

5.  Medication adherence in Medicare-enrolled older adults with asthma before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Authors:  Olivia L Ramey; Armando Silva Almodóvar; Milap C Nahata
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.248

6.  Early Real-World Experience of Tofacitinib for Psoriatic Arthritis: Data from a United States Healthcare Claims Database.

Authors:  Philip J Mease; Pamela Young; David Gruben; Lara Fallon; Rebecca Germino; Arthur Kavanaugh
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.070

7.  Comparative Adverse Kidney Outcomes in Women Receiving Raloxifene and Denosumab in a Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Hsin-Wei Chen; Chien-Ning Hsu; Yueh-Ting Lee; Chung-Ming Fu; Shih-Wei Wang; Chiang-Chi Huang; Lung-Chih Li
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-24

8.  Implementation of a model integrating primary and oncology pharmacists' care for patients taking oral anticancer agents (OAA).

Authors:  Karen B Farris; Tiffany Cadwallader; Joel Farley; Katie Gatwood; Emily Mackler; Justin Gatwood
Journal:  Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm       Date:  2022-07-29

Review 9.  Refill Adherence Measures and Its Association with Economic, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brandon Chua; James Morgan; Kai Zhen Yap
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Real-world analysis of hospitalizations in patients with epilepsy and treated with perampanel.

Authors:  Edward Faught; Xuan Li; Jiyoon Choi; Manoj Malhotra; Russell L Knoth
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2021-08-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.