Literature DB >> 31556679

The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.

Michael Carnovale1, Martin Sellbom2, R Michael Bagby2.   

Abstract

The 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11), recently approved by the World Health Organization, contains a new diagnostic approach for personality disorders. This approach partly involves the consideration of 5 dimensional trait domain qualifiers-Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissocial, Disinhibition, and Anankastia. Oltmanns and Widiger (2018) recently developed a self-report measure, the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), to assess the 5 domains; however, further examination of the psychometric properties of the PiCD is warranted due to its limited research base. The present study aimed to further examine the reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance of the PiCD in an ethnically diverse undergraduate sample (N = 518), who were also administered the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form. First, results suggested that the PiCD domain scales exhibited adequate internal consistency reliability via coefficient categorical omega (range = .77-.87). Next, exploratory structural equation modeling results suggested support for a 4-factor solution, with the 4th factor thought to represent a bipolar continuum of Anankastia to Disinhibition severity. Random-intercept factor analysis results suggested a small amount of variance in items (4.88%) attributable to idiosyncratic scale usage. Lastly, relations between PiCD domains and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form scales (Personality Psychopathology-5 and Higher Order scales) provided support for the validity of the Negative Affectivity, Detachment, and Dissocial domains, though relatively less support for the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains. Further examination of other psychometric properties and the nomological network of the PiCD is recommended. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31556679     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Implications of ICD-11 for Diagnosing and Treating Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Bo Bach; Roger Mulder
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 8.081

2.  The self- and informant-personality inventories for ICD-11: Agreement, structure, and relations with health, social, and satisfaction variables in older adults.

Authors:  Joshua R Oltmanns; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2021-03-29

3.  Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish Validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a Mixed Community and Clinical Sample.

Authors:  Fernando Gutiérrez; Anton Aluja; José Ruiz; Luis F García; Miguel Gárriz; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Zotes; David Gallardo-Pujol; Maria V Navarro-Haro; Miquel Alabèrnia-Segura; Joan Ignasi Mestre-Pintó; Marta Torrens; Josep M Peri; Bárbara Sureda; Joaquim Soler; Juan Carlos Pascual; Gemma Vall; Natalia Calvo; Marc Ferrer; Joshua R Oltmanns; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-06-25

4.  Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms.

Authors:  André Kerber; Martin Schultze; Steffen Müller; Rosa Maria Rühling; Aidan G C Wright; Carsten Spitzer; Robert F Krueger; Christine Knaevelsrud; Johannes Zimmermann
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-12-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.