Norbert Klein1, Thomas Kuntz2, Stefan Dhein3. 1. Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Internal Intensive-Care Medicine, Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH Leipzig, Delitzscher Straße 141, 04129, Leipzig, Germany. norbert.klein@sanktgeorg.de. 2. Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Internal Intensive-Care Medicine, Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH Leipzig, Delitzscher Straße 141, 04129, Leipzig, Germany. 3. Medical Faculty, Rudolf Boehm Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% should be protected from sudden cardiac death with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The onset of the effect of optimal medical therapy (OMT) is unclear, and a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) can bridge this period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study analyzed 104 patients (age, 68.9 ± 11.7 years; 81% [84/104] male) whose first diagnosis included an LVEF <35%. After exclusion of reversible causes for LVEF reduction and initiation/adjustment of the OMT, the WCD was employed. The LVEF and indication for ICD were re-evaluated after 62 ± 36 days. The LVEF development and implantation rate were correlated with underlying disease (ischemic [ICM] or nonischemic cardiomyopathy [NICM]), comorbidities, and age/gender. RESULTS: The wearing time of the WCD was 22.8 ± 1.9 h/day. An LVEF improvement from 28.5 ± 6.4% to 40 ± 11.7% was achieved through OMT (p < 0.0001). An improvement in LVEF of up to more than 35% was achieved in 66 of 104 patients (63%), and only 37% of patients were subsequently given an ICD. This affected 41% of patients with ICM and 30% of patients with NICM (p = 0.205). Notably, no ICD interventions were observed over 362 ± 89.5 days after implantation in the ICD-receiver group. CONCLUSION: The indication for ICD can be re-evaluated after 2 months. Patients with NICM respond better to OMT compared with ICM patients. The LVEF recovered to >35% in >60% of cases.
BACKGROUND:Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35% should be protected from sudden cardiac death with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The onset of the effect of optimal medical therapy (OMT) is unclear, and a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) can bridge this period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study analyzed 104 patients (age, 68.9 ± 11.7 years; 81% [84/104] male) whose first diagnosis included an LVEF <35%. After exclusion of reversible causes for LVEF reduction and initiation/adjustment of the OMT, the WCD was employed. The LVEF and indication for ICD were re-evaluated after 62 ± 36 days. The LVEF development and implantation rate were correlated with underlying disease (ischemic [ICM] or nonischemic cardiomyopathy [NICM]), comorbidities, and age/gender. RESULTS: The wearing time of the WCD was 22.8 ± 1.9 h/day. An LVEF improvement from 28.5 ± 6.4% to 40 ± 11.7% was achieved through OMT (p < 0.0001). An improvement in LVEF of up to more than 35% was achieved in 66 of 104 patients (63%), and only 37% of patients were subsequently given an ICD. This affected 41% of patients with ICM and 30% of patients with NICM (p = 0.205). Notably, no ICD interventions were observed over 362 ± 89.5 days after implantation in the ICD-receiver group. CONCLUSION: The indication for ICD can be re-evaluated after 2 months. Patients with NICM respond better to OMT compared with ICM patients. The LVEF recovered to >35% in >60% of cases.
Authors: David Duncker; Thorben König; Stephan Hohmann; Johann Bauersachs; Christian Veltmann Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 5.501