| Literature DB >> 31555597 |
Hua Yang1, Jie Wang2, Zehuan Li3, Yi Yang4, Liuxiao Yang4, Yong Zhang1, Yinghong Shi4, Ya Cao5, Jian Zhou4,6,7, Zheng Wang4, Qing Chen1.
Abstract
Early relapse after hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a tremendous influence on the long-term survival outcomes of ICC patients. The purpose of our study was to investigate risk factors for early tumor relapse and confirm whether early relapse was correlated with ICC patients' long-term survival outcomes. Three hundred and twenty-two consecutive ICC patients undergoing partial hepatectomy at Liver Surgery Department of Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University, Shanghai, China) between January 2005 and December 2011 were included in this retrospectively study. The definition of early relapse had been described as tumor relapse within 24 months after hepatectomy in ICC patients. We identified a total of 168 ICC patients with early relapse and 23 ICC patients with late relapse after hepatectomy. From the time of relapse, the long-term survival outcomes were worse among patients who had early vs. late relapse (median OS 16.5 vs. 44.7 months, respectively; P < 0.0001). The overall survival of the early relapse group was lower than that of the late relapse group (P < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that multiple tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.951; 95% CI, 1.382-2.755; P < 0.001), lymphonodus metastasis (HR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.061-2.168; P = 0.022), and higher serum CA19-9 levels (HR, 1.495; 95% CI, 1.095-2.039; P = 0.011) were independent risk factors of early relapse. Moreover, multiple tumors (HR, 1.641; 95% CI, 1.120-2.406; P = 0.011), lymphonodus metastasis (HR, 2.008; 95% CI, 1.367-2.949; P < 0.001), elevated NLR (HR, 1.921; 95% CI, 1.331-2.774; P < 0.001) and higher serum CA19-9 levels (HR, 1.990; 95% CI, 1.409-2.812; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of overall survival for ICC patients with early relapse. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that multiple tumors, lymphonodus metastasis, and higher serum CA19-9 levels were associated with the increased risks of early relapse and worse prognoses of ICC after curative-intent resection.Entities:
Keywords: CA19-9; early relapse; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; liver resection; prognosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31555597 PMCID: PMC6737003 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier analyses of cumulative relapse rate for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients (n = 322).
Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with early and without relapse after curative liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 299).
| Age (year) | ≤50 | 75 (25.1) | 41 (24.4) | 34 (26.0) | 0.759 |
| >50 | 224 (74.9) | 127 (75.6) | 97 (74.0) | ||
| Sex | Female | 118 (39.5) | 64 (38.1) | 54 (41.2) | 0.583 |
| Male | 181 (60.5) | 104 (61.9) | 77 (58.8) | ||
| HBsAg | Negative | 178 (59.5) | 101 (60.1) | 77 (58.8) | 0.815 |
| Positive | 121 (40.5) | 67 (39.9) | 54 (41.2) | ||
| HCV | Negative | 297 (99.3) | 167 (99.4) | 130 (99.2) | 1 |
| Positive | 2 (0.7) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.8) | ||
| AFP (ng/ml) | ≤20 | 264 (88.3) | 150 (89.3) | 114 (87.0) | 0.546 |
| >20 | 35 (11.7) | 18 (10.7) | 17 (13.0) | ||
| Child-Pugh | A | 289 (96.7) | 164 (97.6) | 125 (95.4) | 0.343 |
| B or C | 10 (3.3) | 4 (2.4) | 6 (4.6) | ||
| Liver cirrhosis | No | 218 (72.9) | 119 (70.8) | 99 (75.6) | 0.360 |
| Yes | 81 (27.1) | 49 (29.2) | 32 (24.4) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | ≤5 | 131 (43.8) | 67 (39.9) | 64 (48.9) | 0.121 |
| >5 | 168 (56.2) | 101 (60.1) | 67 (51.1) | ||
| Tumor number | Single | 229 (76.6) | 120 (71.4) | 109 (83.2) | |
| Multiple | 70 (23.4) | 48 (28.6) | 22 (16.8) | ||
| Lymphonodus node metastasis | Yes | 55 (18.4) | 42 (25.0) | 13 (10.0) | |
| No | 244 (81.6) | 126 (75.0) | 118 (90.0) | ||
| Microvascular invasion | Yes | 42 (14.0) | 30 (17.9) | 12 (9.2) | |
| No | 257 (86.0) | 138 (82.1) | 119 (90.8) | ||
| Tumor differentiation | Poor | 66 (22.1) | 36 (21.4) | 30 (22.9) | 0.550 |
| Moderated | 184 (61.5) | 101 (60.1) | 83 (63.4) | ||
| Well | 49 (16.4) | 31 (18.5) | 18 (13.7) | ||
| TNM stage | I + II | 226 (75.6) | 116 (69.0) | 110 (84.0) | |
| III + IVA | 73 (24.4) | 52 (31.0) | 21 (16.0) | ||
| NLR | Low | 135 (45.2) | 70 (41.7) | 65 (49.6) | 0.170 |
| High | 164 (54.8) | 98 (58.3) | 66 (50.4) | ||
| PLR | Low | 156 (52.2) | 82 (48.8) | 74 (56.5) | 0.187 |
| High | 143 (47.8) | 86 (51.2) | 57 (43.5) | ||
| LMR | Low | 195 (65.2) | 115 (68.5) | 80 (61.1) | 0.184 |
| High | 104 (34.8) | 53 (31.5) | 51 (38.9) | ||
| CA19-9, U/ml | ≤89 | 190 (63.5) | 96 (57.1) | 94 (71.8) | |
| >89 | 109 (36.5) | 72 (42.9) | 37 (28.2) | ||
Boldface type indicates significant values.
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; P, poor differentiation; M, moderated differentiation; W, well-differentiation.
Tumor differentiation was determined according to the “British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of cholangiocarcinoma”.
TNM stage: American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Fisher's exact tests; chi-square tests for all other analyses.
Figure 2Overall survival of patients according to the type of relapse after initial surgery for ICC. (A) Overall survival curves of ICC patients with relapse and without relapse (n = 322), P < 0.0001 (log-rank test). (B) Overall survival curves of ICC patients with early relapse and without relapse (n = 299), P < 0.0001 (log-rank test).
Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of time to early relapse in patients who were relapse at 2 years after resection with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 168).
| Age, year (≤50 vs. >50) | 1.299 (0.913–1.849) | 0.147 | NA | NA |
| Sex (female vs. male) | 0.884 (0.647–1.208) | 0.440 | NA | NA |
| HBsAg (negative vs. positive) | 0.805 (0.592–1.096) | 0.168 | NA | NA |
| HCV (negative vs. positive) | 0.305 (0.074–1.248) | 0.098 | NA | NA |
| AFP, ng/ml (≤20 vs. >20) | 1.490 (0.910–2.439) | 0.113 | NA | NA |
| Child-Pugh (A vs. B or C) | 1.030 (0.381–2.785) | 0.953 | NA | NA |
| Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) | 1.108 (0.794–1.547) | 0.545 | NA | NA |
| Tumor size, cm (≤5 vs. >5) | 1.167 (0.856–1.591) | 0.329 | NA | NA |
| Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 1.986 (1.409–2.799) | 1.951(1.382–2.755) | ||
| Lymphonodus node metastasis (no vs. yes) | 1.558 (1.093–2.219) | 1.517(1.061–2.168) | ||
| Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) | 1.593 (0.960–2.643) | 0.072 | NA | NA |
| Tumor differentiation | 1.107 (0.815–1.502) | 0.516 | NA | NA |
| TNM stage | 1.336 (0.962–1.856) | 0.084 | NA | NA |
| NLR (low vs. high) | 1.318 (0.968–1.795) | 0.080 | NA | NA |
| PLR (low vs. high) | 1.259 (0.927–1.710) | 0.140 | NA | NA |
| LMR (low vs. high) | 0.812 (0.584–1.128) | 0.214 | NA | NA |
| CA19-9, U/ml (≤89 vs. >89) | 1.478 (1.084–2.016) | 1.495 (1.095–2.039) | ||
NA, not applicable.
Boldface type indicates significant values.
Analyses were conducted using univariate analysis or multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; CI, confidential interval; P, poor differentiation; M, moderated differentiation; W, well-differentiation.
Tumor differentiation was determined according to the “British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of cholangiocarcinoma”.
TNM stage: American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses of factors associated with overall survival in patients who were relapse at 2 years after resection with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 168).
| Age, year (≤50 vs. >50) | 1.069 (0.719–1.591) | 0.741 | NA | NA |
| Sex (female vs. male) | 1.009 (0.711–1.431) | 0.962 | NA | NA |
| HBsAg (negative vs. positive) | 1.100 (0.783–1.547) | 0.582 | NA | NA |
| HCV (negative vs. positive) | 0.228 (0.055–0.941) | 0.620(0.144–2.664) | 0.520 | |
| AFP, ng/ml (≤20 vs. >20) | 0.978 (0.560–1.708) | 0.938 | NA | NA |
| Child-Pugh (A vs. B or C) | 1.532 (0.486–4.827) | 0.466 | NA | NA |
| Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) | 0.908 (0.621–1.326) | 0.616 | NA | NA |
| Tumor size, cm (≤5 vs. >5) | 1.258 (0.888–1.781) | 0.197 | NA | NA |
| Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 1.508 (1.036–2.194) | 1.641(1.120–2.406) | ||
| Lymphonodus node metastasis (no vs. yes) | 2.147 (1.469–3.138) | 2.008(1.367–2.949) | ||
| Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) | 1.004 (0.634–1.588) | 0.987 | NA | NA |
| Tumor differentiation | 0.916 (0.650–1.293) | 0.619 | NA | NA |
| TNM stage | 1.974 (1.379–2.826) | 0.912(0.441–1.885) | 0.803 | |
| NLR (low vs. high) | 1.904 (1.329–2.729) | 1.921(1.331–2.774) | ||
| PLR (low vs. high) | 1.384 (0.985–1.944) | 0.061 | NA | NA |
| LMR (low vs. high) | 0.606 (0.414–0.885) | 0.761(0.489–1.182) | 0.224 | |
| CA19-9, U/ml (≤89 vs. >89) | 1.926 (1.369–2.710) | 1.990 (1.409–2.812) | ||
NA, not applicable.
Boldface type indicates significant values.
Analyses were conducted using univariate analysis or multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HCV, hepatitis C virus; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; LMR, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; CI, confidential interval; P, poor differentiation; M, moderated differentiation; W, well-differentiation.
Tumor differentiation was determined according to the “British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of cholangiocarcinoma”.
TNM stage: American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall survival rate for ICC patients with early relapse according to serum CA19-9, pre-operative NLR, PLR, and LMR. (A) Compared with the serum CA19-9 high group, OS was significantly higher in the serum CA19-9 low group (n = 168), P < 0.0001 (log-rank test). (B) Compared with the pre-operative NLR high group, OS was significantly higher in the NLR low group (n = 168), P = 0.0008 (log-rank test). (C) Compared with the pre-operative PLR high group, OS was significantly higher in the pre-operative PLR low group (n = 168), P = 0.0493 (log-rank test). (D) Compared with the pre-operative LMR low group, OS was significantly higher in the pre-operative LMR high group (n = 168), P = 0.0084 (log-rank test).
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall survival rate for ICC patients with early relapse according to the TNM stage, lymphonodus node metastasis (LNM), tumor number, and tumor size. (A) Compared with the TNM high group, OS was significantly higher in the TNM low group (n = 168), P < 0.0001 (log-rank test). (B) Compared with the LNM positive group, OS was significantly higher in the LNM negative group (n = 168), P < 0.0001 (log-rank test). (C) Compared with the multiple tumors group, OS was significantly higher in the single tumor group (n = 168), P = 0.0216 (log-rank test). (D) The overall survival rate was no significant difference between small and large tumor size (n = 168), P = 0.0742 (log-rank test).