Literature DB >> 31555553

High grade renal trauma management: a survey of practice patterns and the perceived need for a prospective management trial.

Rachel A Moses1, Ross E Anderson2, Sorena Keihani2, James M Hotaling2, Raminder Nirula3, Daniel J Vargo3, Jeremy B Myers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the current practice patterns of practitioners managing high grade renal trauma and determine perceived need for a prospective trial on the management of renal trauma.
METHODS: We distributed an electronic survey to members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) and The Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS). The survey evaluated demographics, interventional radiology (IR) access, and renal trauma management. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze participants' responses.
RESULTS: A total of 253 practitioners responded (age 48.4±10.4 years). The majority were acute care/trauma surgeons (ACS/TS) (63.2%), followed by urologists (34.4%) practicing at level 1 trauma centers (80.6%) in 39 US states. Most participants were in practice >10 years (62.8%); and had completed an ACS/TS (53.8%), or trauma/reconstructive urology (25.7%) fellowship. Ninety-five percent (241/253) found value in renal preservation with 74% utilizing IR embolization in the last year. However, there was wide variation in threshold for angiography, low rates of renal repair (24%) or packing (20%) and half reported performing a nephrectomy within the prior year. More than 80% believed there was value in a prospective trial to evaluate a protocol to decrease nephrectomy rates in renal trauma management.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents had access to IR, reported comfort in renorrhaphy, and valued renal preservation. There was variation in thresholds for bleeding intervention, and nephrectomy was still a common management strategy. There is great interest among trauma surgeons and urologists for a prospective trial of renal trauma management aimed at decreasing nephrectomy when possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Renal trauma; surveys and questionnaires; trauma centers

Year:  2019        PMID: 31555553      PMCID: PMC6732102          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


  24 in total

1.  Predictors of outcome for blunt high grade renal injury treated with conservative intent.

Authors:  James McGuire; Matthew F Bultitude; Paul Davis; Jim Koukounaras; Peter L Royce; Niall M Corcoran
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Contemporary management of renal trauma: differences between urologists and trauma surgeons.

Authors:  Lawrence L Yeung; Steven B Brandes
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 3.  The literature increasingly supports expectant (conservative) management of renal trauma--a systematic review.

Authors:  Richard A Santucci; Mark B Fisher
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-08

4.  A survey of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma member practices in the management of blunt splenic injury.

Authors:  Ben L Zarzaur; Rosemary A Kozar; Timothy C Fabian; Raul Coimbra
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-05

5.  A conservative approach to major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extravasation and devitalized renal segments.

Authors:  S M Moudouni; J J Patard; A Manunta; P Guiraud; F Guille; B Lobel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  High-grade renal injuries: radiographic findings correlated with intervention for renal hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jeremy B Myers; William O Brant; Joshua A Broghammer
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  A national study of trauma level designation and renal trauma outcomes.

Authors:  James M Hotaling; Jin Wang; Mathew D Sorensen; Frederick P Rivara; John L Gore; Jerry Jurkovich; Christopher D McClung; Hunter Wessells; Bryan B Voelzke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  A 10-year review of blunt renal artery injuries at an urban level I trauma centre.

Authors:  Stuart J D Chow; Keith J Thompson; Jodi F Hartman; Michelle L Wright
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment.

Authors:  Michael T Cudnik; Craig D Newgard; Michael R Sayre; Steven M Steinberg
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-05

10.  Renal injury and operative management in the United States: results of a population-based study.

Authors:  Hunter Wessells; Donald Suh; James R Porter; Frederick Rivara; Ellen J MacKenzie; Gregory J Jurkovich; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2003-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of Endovascular Management of high-grade blunt renal injury.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Chongpei Wen; Songlin Song; Guilian Li; Yanggang Yan; Shoucai Cheng; Junmei Zeng; Zhidong Lin; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2022-02-26

2.  External validation of a nomogram predicting risk of bleeding control interventions after high-grade renal trauma: The Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study.

Authors:  Sorena Keihani; Sherry S Wang; Ryan P Joyce; Douglas M Rogers; Joel A Gross; Alexander P Nocera; J Patrick Selph; Elisa Fang; Judith C Hagedorn; Bryan B Voelzke; Michael E Rezaee; Rachel A Moses; Chirag S Arya; Rachel L Sensenig; Katie Glavin; Joshua A Broghammer; Margaret M Higgins; Shubham Gupta; Clara M Castillejo Becerra; Nima Baradaran; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Raminder Nirula; Jeremy B Myers
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.313

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.