Literature DB >> 31555460

Feline foamy virus seroprevalence and demographic risk factors in stray domestic cat populations in Colorado, Southern California and Florida, USA.

Sarah Kechejian1, Nick Dannemiller1, Simona Kraberger2, Carmen Ledesma Feliciano3, Martin Löchelt4, Scott Carver5, Sue VandeWoude1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our study aim was to document the seroprevalence and associated risk factors of feline foamy virus (FFV) infection in domestic cat populations presented to animal shelters located in Southern California, Colorado and Florida, USA.
METHODS: We used a glutathione S-transferase capture ELISA targeting the FFV Gag antigen to screen domestic cat serum collected from cats with unknown owners at eight different animal shelters from Colorado (n = 105, three shelters), Southern California (n = 172, three shelters) and Florida (n = 31, two shelters). χ2 statistics determined location effect on seroprevalence. Bayesian generalized linear models were used to explore age and sex as potential risk factors for infection.
RESULTS: FFV seroprevalence was 64.0% across all locations. Seroprevalence by location was as follows: Southern California 75.0%, Colorado 52.4% and Florida 41.9%, with Southern California's seroprevalence being significantly higher. Age had a significant effect on model fit for all locations, with adults having a higher probability of being infected. In Colorado, sex also had a significant effect on model fit, with males having a higher probability of being infected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We have documented that FFV is extremely common in stray domestic cat populations across varied geographic and ecological niches throughout the USA. Adult cats are at a higher FFV infection risk than young cats. FFV has been associated with a higher risk of other retroviral infections and has been implicated in several chronic diseases of cats. Additional epidemiological and clinical studies are warranted to investigate the potential impacts of FFV on domestic cat health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feline foamy virus; United States; epidemiology; retrovirus; spumaretrovirinae

Year:  2019        PMID: 31555460      PMCID: PMC6747863          DOI: 10.1177/2055116919873736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JFMS Open Rep        ISSN: 2055-1169


  22 in total

Review 1.  Why aren't foamy viruses pathogenic?

Authors:  M Linial
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 2.  Non-primate foamy viruses.

Authors:  A Saïb
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Antibodies against Gag are diagnostic markers for feline foamy virus infections while Env and Bet reactivity is undetectable in a substantial fraction of infected cats.

Authors:  Fabian Romen; Michael Pawlita; Peter Sehr; Silke Bachmann; Johannes Schröder; Hans Lutz; Martin Löchelt
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  Construction of infectious feline foamy virus genomes: cat antisera do not cross-neutralize feline foamy virus chimera with serotype-specific Env sequences.

Authors:  M Zemba; A Alke; J Bodem; I G Winkler; R L Flower; K Pfrepper; H Delius; R M Flügel; M Löchelt
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2000-01-05       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  Serological survey of the Iriomote cat (Felis iriomotensis) in Japan.

Authors:  M Mochizuki; M Akuzawa; H Nagatomo
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.535

6.  Epidemiology of feline foamy virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in domestic and feral cats: a seroepidemiological study.

Authors:  I G Winkler; M Löchelt; R L Flower
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Characterization of the humoral immune response and virus replication in cats experimentally infected with feline foamy virus.

Authors:  A Alke; A Schwantes; M Zemba; R M Flügel; M Löchelt
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Feline foamy virus genome and replication strategy.

Authors:  Jacqueline Roy; Wolfram Rudolph; Thomas Juretzek; Kathleen Gärtner; Michael Bock; Ottmar Herchenröder; Dirk Lindemann; Martin Heinkelein; Axel Rethwilm
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Is feline foamy virus really apathogenic?

Authors:  A C German; D A Harbour; C R Helps; T J Gruffydd-Jones
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 10.  Foamy virus vectors: an awaited alternative to gammaretro- and lentiviral vectors.

Authors:  Axel Rethwilm
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.391

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic Uncertainty and the Epidemiology of Feline Foamy Virus in Pumas (Puma concolor).

Authors:  Nicholas G Dannemiller; Sarah Kechejian; Simona Kraberger; Kenneth Logan; Mathew Alldredge; Kevin R Crooks; Sue VandeWoude; Scott Carver
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Serum Samples from Co-Infected and Domestic Cat Field Isolates Nonspecifically Bind FIV and Other Antigens in Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays.

Authors:  Alex Moskaluk; Mary Nehring; Sue VandeWoude
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-05-28

3.  Seroprevalence of Feline Foamy Virus in Domestic Cats in Poland.

Authors:  Magdalena Materniak-Kornas; Tadeusz Frymus; Martin Löchelt; Jacek Kuźmak
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.744

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.