| Literature DB >> 31555272 |
Jingjing Wang1,2, Bin Yang2,3, Weilin Wang4, Xiaorui Song4, Qiufen Jiang2, Limei Qiu2, Lingling Wang3,4,5, Linsheng Song3,4,6.
Abstract
Accumulating evidences suggest that the enhanced immune responses and increased protection against bacteria-induced mortality can be initiated after the primary exposure to various microbial communities and their components in various organisms including commercially valuable crustaceans. In the present study, the survival rate and immune responses of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis were determined after an immune priming (IP) with formalin-killed Aeromonas hydrophila and an immune challenge (ICH) with the same but live pathogen (Ah group). A group in which the animals received a salt injection prior to challenge was maintained as control (Ns group). In the present study, it was shown that an IP with killed A. hydrophila can significantly protect the crabs against the ICH with a lethal dose of the live pathogen. The increased survival was associated with elevated rate and duration of phagocytosis. The antibacterial activity of the serum was significantly increased in Ah group compared to that in Ns group. Significant changes of phenoloxidase (PO) activities were also found between Ah and Ns group but not in Ah group between IP and ICH. No significant changes of lysozyme were found in Ah and NS group during the whole experiment except 3 h after IP. In addition, the levels of transcripts and protein of Dscam were increased in hemocytes of the crabs from Ah group. All the results suggested that a primary immune priming with a particular killed pathogen could induce an enhanced immunity in crabs when they were encountered secondly with the same live pathogen. The evidences of elevated immune protections in crabs would contribute to better understand the mechanism of immune priming in invertebrates.Entities:
Keywords: Aeromonas hydrophila; Eriocheir sinensis; immune priming; immune protection; phagocytosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31555272 PMCID: PMC6722218 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1The experimental design of Chinese mitten crab E. sinensis receiving immune priming (IP) and lethal challenge (ICH). For survival rate in blank, Naïve, Ns and Ah group: N = 30; For hemolymph sampling in Ns and Ah group: T = 15, N = 6.
The primers used in the present study.
| Cr-RTF | TGCTGCGAAGATGAACGGGAAAT | Crustin real-time PCR |
| Cr-RTR | CTAGTAGGAGGACACACAGGGCG | Crustin real-time PCR |
| Pr-RTF | CCATCCCTTCCTGCTTACCA | proPO real-time PCR |
| Pr-RTR | CTCCATCACAAACCCTAACGACTT | proPO real-time PCR |
| Al-RTF | GACGCAGGAGGATGCTAAC | ALF real-time PCR |
| Al-RTR | TGATGGCAGATGAAGGACAC | ALF real-time PCR |
| Ds-RTF | GTGGAACCCAAAGTACAGACCG | Dscam real-time PCR |
| Ds-RTR | AGAGTTGATGCGAAGAACAGCC | Dscam real-time PCR |
| Actin-F | GCATCCACGAGACCACTTACA | β-actin Real-time PCR |
| Actin-R | CTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCACATC | β-actin Real-time PCR |
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival following the ICH with live Aeromonas hydrophila after previous IP with A. hydrophila (Ah group) or Normal saline (Ns group) or without any previous injection (Naïve) in E. sinensis (N = 30). Blank crabs without any injections during IP and ICH were employed as control. 0–168 h means the time started after ICH. This survival experiment was repeated for three times.
Figure 3Effects of A. hydrophila on Total Hemocyte Counts observed under an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope in E. sinensis. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD) after data of six individuals in each group at one time point was firstly averaged. Red arrow indicates the 1st injection (IP) and 2nd injection (ICH). Bars with any letter mean significant difference on the THC between Ah and Ns groups at one time-point after t-test (p < 0.05). Bars with different letters mean significant difference among the Ah groups after S-N-K test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Effects of A. hydrophila on hemocyte phagocytic activity using the FITC labeled A. hydrophila observed under an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope. (A) The phagocytic rate (PR) and (B) phagocytic index (PI) in response to the IP with formalin-killed A. hydrophila and the ICH with live A. hydrophila in E. sinensis. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD) after data of six individuals in each group at one time point was firstly averaged. Red arrow indicates 1st injection (IP) and 2nd injection (ICH). Bars with any letter mean significant difference on the phagocytic activities between Ah and Ns groups at one time-point after t-test (p < 0.05). Bars with different letters mean significant difference among the Ah groups after S-N-K test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Antibacterial activities in hemolymph supernatant of crabs receiving the IP with formalin-killed A. hydrophila and the ICH with live A. hydrophila in E. sinensis. Bacterial growth was recorded as absorbance at 600 nm from the time (h) closest to the calculated T50 for the bacteria-only control after T = 0 had been subtracted. ΔΔOD = [OD Control(T50) – OD Control(0h)] – [OD Test(T50) – OD Test(0h)]. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD) after data of six individuals in each group at one time point was firstly averaged. Red arrow indicates 1st injection (IP) and 2nd injection (ICH). Bars with any letter mean significant difference on the antibacterial activities between Ah and Ns groups at one time-point after t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6PO and lysozyme activities in hemolymph supernatant of crabs receiving the IP with formalin-killed A. hydrophila and the ICH with live A. hydrophila. (A) PO activity in E. sinensis, (B) Lysozyme activity in E. sinensis. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD) after data of six individuals in each group at one time point was firstly averaged. Red arrow indicates 1st injection (IP) and 2nd injection (ICH). Bars with any letter mean significant difference on PO and lysozyme activities between Ah and Ns groups at one time-point after t-test (p < 0.05). Bars with different letters mean significant difference among the Ah groups after S-N-K test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Relative expression of immune-related genes in crab hemocytes. The mRNA expressions of (A) Crustin, (B) ProPO, and (C) ALF were measured following the IP with formalin-killed A. hydrophila and the ICH with live A. hydrophila in E. sinensis. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD) after data of six individuals in each group at one time point was firstly averaged. Red arrow indicates 1st injection (IP) and 2nd injection (ICH). Bars with any letter mean significant difference on mRNA expression between Ah and Ns groups at one time-point after t-test (p < 0.05). Bars with different letters mean significant difference among the Ah groups after S-N-K test (p < 0.05).
Figure 8The mRNA expression and protein level of Dscam in crab hemocytes. (A) The mRNA expression following the IP with formalin-killed A. hydrophila and the ICH with live A. hydrophila in E. sinensis using real-time PCR method. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD) after data of six individuals in each group at one time point was firstly averaged. Red arrow indicates 1st injection (IP) and 2nd injection (ICH). Bars with any letter mean significant difference on Dscam mRNA expression between Ah and Ns groups at one time-point after t-test (p < 0.05). Bars with different letters mean significant difference among the Ah groups after S-N-K test (p < 0.05). (B) Western-blot analysis of Dscam in E. sinensis. Lane 1: blank group; lane 2: Ns group at 12 h after 1st injection (IP) with normal saline; lane 3: Ah group at 12 h after 1st injection with formalin-killed A. hydrophila; lane 4: Ns group at 12 h after 2nd injection (ICH) with live A. hydrophila; lane 5: Ah group at 12 h after 2nd injection with live A. hydrophila; lane 6: protein molecular standard. The histogram below showed the intensity ratio of target proteins to blank group after scanning the gray levels of the protein band using Photoshop software. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate assays with the standard error (SD). Bars with different letters mean significant difference among the groups after ANOVA (p < 0.05).