Sarah Ruth Valkenborghs1, Michael Noetel2, Charles Hillman3,4, Michael Nilsson5, Jordan Smith1, Francisco Ortega6, David Revalds Lubans7. 1. Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Queensland, Australia. 3. Departments of Psychology and. 4. Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia; and. 6. Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. 7. Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia; david.lubans@newcastle.edu.au.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Advances in neuroimaging techniques have resulted in an exponential increase in the number of studies investigating the effects of physical activity on brain structure and function. Authors of studies have linked physical activity and fitness with brain regions and networks integral to cognitive function and scholastic performance in children and adolescents but findings have not been synthesized. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies in which the impact of physical activity on brain structure and function in children and adolescents is examined. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, Ovid Medline, SportDiscus, and Embase) were systematically searched for experimental studies published between 2002 and March 1, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion according to predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data for key variables and synthesized findings qualitatively. RESULTS: Nine studies were included (task-based functional MRI [n = 4], diffusion tensor imaging [n = 3], arterial spin labeling [n = 1], and resting-state functional MRI [n = 1]) in which results for 5 distinct and 4 similar study samples aged 8.7 ± 0.6 to 10.2 ± 1.0 years and typically of relatively low socioeconomic status were reported. Effects were reported for 12 regions, including frontal lobe (n = 3), parietal lobe (n = 3), anterior cingulate cortex (n = 2), hippocampus (n = 1), and several white matter tracts and functional networks. LIMITATIONS: Findings need to be interpreted with caution as quantitative syntheses were not possible because of study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from randomized controlled trials that participation in physical activity may modify white matter integrity and activation of regions key to cognitive processes. Additional larger hypothesis-driven studies are needed to replicate findings.
CONTEXT: Advances in neuroimaging techniques have resulted in an exponential increase in the number of studies investigating the effects of physical activity on brain structure and function. Authors of studies have linked physical activity and fitness with brain regions and networks integral to cognitive function and scholastic performance in children and adolescents but findings have not been synthesized. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies in which the impact of physical activity on brain structure and function in children and adolescents is examined. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus, Ovid Medline, SportDiscus, and Embase) were systematically searched for experimental studies published between 2002 and March 1, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion according to predetermined criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data for key variables and synthesized findings qualitatively. RESULTS: Nine studies were included (task-based functional MRI [n = 4], diffusion tensor imaging [n = 3], arterial spin labeling [n = 1], and resting-state functional MRI [n = 1]) in which results for 5 distinct and 4 similar study samples aged 8.7 ± 0.6 to 10.2 ± 1.0 years and typically of relatively low socioeconomic status were reported. Effects were reported for 12 regions, including frontal lobe (n = 3), parietal lobe (n = 3), anterior cingulate cortex (n = 2), hippocampus (n = 1), and several white matter tracts and functional networks. LIMITATIONS: Findings need to be interpreted with caution as quantitative syntheses were not possible because of study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from randomized controlled trials that participation in physical activity may modify white matter integrity and activation of regions key to cognitive processes. Additional larger hypothesis-driven studies are needed to replicate findings.
Authors: Abel Plaza-Florido; Inmaculada Pérez-Prieto; Pablo Molina-Garcia; Shlomit Radom-Aizik; Francisco B Ortega; Signe Altmäe Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 3.569
Authors: Britni R Belcher; Jennifer Zink; Anisa Azad; Claire E Campbell; Sandhya P Chakravartti; Megan M Herting Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2020-08-18
Authors: Timothy A McGuine; Kevin M Biese; Scott J Hetzel; Alison Schwarz; Stephanie Kliethermes; Claudia L Reardon; David R Bell; M Alison Brooks; Andrew M Watson Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Rui Zhang; Peter Manza; Dardo Tomasi; Sung Won Kim; Ehsan Shokri-Kojori; Sukru B Demiral; Danielle S Kroll; Dana E Feldman; Katherine L McPherson; Catherine L Biesecker; Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Sarah L Aghjayan; Alina Lesnovskaya; Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Jamie C Peven; Chelsea M Stillman; Kirk I Erickson Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 3.753