Literature DB >> 31554540

The Association of Climatic Factors with Rates of Surgical Site Infections: 17 Years' Data From Hospital Infection Surveillance.

Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi1, Frank Schwab, Peter Hoffmann, Petra Gastmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most common healthcare- associated infections. The aim of our explorative study was to determine how selected climatic factors are associated with SSI rates.
METHODS: SSI rates were calculated for operative procedures included in the surgi- cal site infection surveillance component (OP-KISS) of the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System, KISS) during the years from 2000 to 2016. The surgeries were associated with department-related and patient-related data. Data of the German Meteorological Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD), including outdoor temperature and rainfall, were used to analyze the association between climatic factors and rates of SSI. Analyses focused on temperature which showed strong correlations with other climatic parameters. A descriptive analysis was performed, using the chi-squared test. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated for SSI rates in relation to tem- perature, using a multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: For the altogether 2 004 793 included operative procedures, 32 118 SSIs were documented. Temperatures ≥ 20 °C were associated with a significantly higher occurrence of SSI compared to temperatures <5 °C (AOR: 1.13; 95% confi- dence intervals [1.06; 1.20]). This increase was found for gram-positive pathogens (AOR: 1.13 [1.03; 1.23]) and, even more pronounced, for gram-negative pathogens (AOR: 1.20 [1.07; 1.35]). The association was strongest for superficial SSI caused by gram-negative pathogens (AOR: 1.38 [1.16; 1.64]).
CONCLUSION: An association between climatic factors and SSI rates was demon- strated. The predicted rise in global temperatures by up to 4 °C by the end of this century compared to preindustrial levels may increase the likelihood of SSI and should be taken into consideration in future preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31554540      PMCID: PMC6783630          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  26 in total

1.  Finding a method for optimizing risk adjustment when comparing surgical-site infection rates.

Authors:  Christian Brandt; Sonja Hansen; Dorit Sohr; Franz Daschner; Henning Rüden; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 2.  Systematic review of a patient care bundle in reducing staphylococcal infections in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Ning Ma; Alun Cameron; David Tivey; Nikki Grae; Sally Roberts; Arthur Morris
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Surgical site infections: Causative pathogens and associated outcomes.

Authors:  John A Weigelt; Benjamin A Lipsky; Ying P Tabak; Karen G Derby; Myoung Kim; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Seasonal Variation of Common Surgical Site Infections: Does Season Matter?

Authors:  Michael J Durkin; Kristen V Dicks; Arthur W Baker; Sarah S Lewis; Rebekah W Moehring; Luke F Chen; Daniel J Sexton; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 5.  Bundles Prevent Surgical Site Infections After Colorectal Surgery: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleksander Zywot; Christine S M Lau; H Stephen Fletcher; Subroto Paul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Greater future global warming inferred from Earth's recent energy budget.

Authors:  Patrick T Brown; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The Seasonal Variability of Surgical Site Infections in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chris A Anthony; Ryan A Peterson; Daniel K Sewell; Linnea A Polgreen; Jacob E Simmering; John J Callaghan; Philip M Polgreen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Geographical variability in the likelihood of bloodstream infections due to gram-negative bacteria: correlation with proximity to the equator and health care expenditure.

Authors:  David Fisman; Eleni Patrozou; Yehuda Carmeli; Eli Perencevich; Ashleigh R Tuite; Leonard A Mermel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Implementation of a bundle of care to reduce surgical site infections in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Authors:  Jasper van der Slegt; Lijckle van der Laan; Eelco J Veen; Yvonne Hendriks; Jannie Romme; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The warmer the weather, the more gram-negative bacteria - impact of temperature on clinical isolates in intensive care units.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Petra Gastmeier; Elisabeth Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Global Warming-the German Picture.

Authors:  Dennis Nowak
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Impact of Pre-operative Hemoglobin A1C Level and Microbiological Pattern on Surgical Site Infection After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Hani N Mufti; Mayar Jarad; Maryam M Haider; Lein Azzhary; Shahad Namnqani; Imran Husain; Saad Albugami; Wael Elamin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-02

3.  A Qualitative Study on Concerns, Needs, and Expectations of Hospital Patients Related to Climate Change: Arguments for a Patient-Centered Adaptation.

Authors:  Benedikt Lenzer; Christina Hoffmann; Peter Hoffmann; Ursula Müller-Werdan; Manuel Rupprecht; Christian Witt; Cornelius Herzig; Uta Liebers
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.