Literature DB >> 31554422

Angiographically Guided Complete Revascularization Versus Selective Stress Echocardiography-Guided Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: The CROSS-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ramón Calviño-Santos1, Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro2, Jesús Peteiro-Vázquez1,3, Jorge Salgado-Fernández1,3, Alejandro Rodríguez-Vilela4, Raúl Franco-Gutiérrez5, Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera1,3, José Ángel Rodríguez-Fernández1, Alejandro Mesías-Prego4, Carlos González-Juanatey5, Guillermo Aldama-López1, Pablo Piñón-Esteban1, Xacobe Flores-Ríos1, Rita Soler-Martín1, Teresa Seoane-Pillado1, Nicolás Vázquez-González1,3, Javier Muñiz3,6, José Manuel Vázquez-Rodríguez1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent trials suggest that complete revascularization in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is associated with better outcomes than infarct-related artery (IRA)-only revascularization. There are different methods to select non-IRA lesions for revascularization procedures. We assessed the clinical outcomes of complete angiographically guided revascularization versus stress echocardiography-guided revascularization in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
METHODS: We performed a randomized clinical trial in patients with multivessel disease who underwent a successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the IRA to test differences in prognosis (composite end point included cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, coronary revascularization, and readmission for heart failure after 12 months of follow-up) between complete angiographically guided revascularization (n=154) or stress echocardiography-guided revascularization (n=152) of the non-IRA lesions in an elective procedure before hospital discharge.
RESULTS: The trial was prematurely stopped after the inclusion of 77% of the planned study population. As many as 152 (99%) patients in the complete revascularization group and 44 (29%) patients in the selective revascularization group required a percutaneous coronary intervention procedure of a non-IRA lesion before discharge. The primary end point occurred in 21 (14%) patients of the stress echocardiography-guided revascularization group and 22 (14%) patients of the complete angiographically guided revascularization group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.52-1.72; P=0.85).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, stress echocardiography-guided revascularization may not be significantly different to complete angiographically guided revascularization, thereby reducing the need for elective revascularization before hospital discharge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01179126.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ST elevation myocardial infarction; echocardiography, stress; humans; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31554422     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  4 in total

Review 1.  CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) update 2022.

Authors:  Yukio Ozaki; Hironori Hara; Yoshinobu Onuma; Yuki Katagiri; Tetsuya Amano; Yoshio Kobayashi; Takashi Muramatsu; Hideki Ishii; Ken Kozuma; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shiro Uemura; Kazushige Kadota; Yutaka Hikichi; Kenichi Tsujita; Junya Ako; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Yoshihiro Morino; Ichiro Hamanaka; Nobuo Shiode; Junya Shite; Junko Honye; Tetsuo Matsubara; Kazuya Kawai; Yasumi Igarashi; Atsunori Okamura; Takayuki Ogawa; Yoshisato Shibata; Takafumi Tsuji; Junji Yajima; Kaoru Iwabuchi; Nobuo Komatsu; Teruyasu Sugano; Masaru Yamaki; Shinichiro Yamada; Hiroaki Hirase; Yuusuke Miyashita; Fuminobu Yoshimachi; Masakazu Kobayashi; Jiro Aoki; Hirotaka Oda; Yoshiaki Katahira; Kinzo Ueda; Masami Nishino; Koichi Nakao; Ichiro Michishita; Takafumi Ueno; Taku Inohara; Shun Kohsaka; Tevfik F Ismail; Patrick W Serruys; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-01-12

2.  Revascularization Strategies in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Is FFR-Guided Strategy Still Valuable?

Authors:  Doosup Shin; Tae-Min Rhee; Seung Hun Lee; Joo Myung Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  The optimal timing for non-culprit percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Yujia Feng; Shu Li; Sihan Hu; Jing Wan; Hua Shao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-26

4.  The year in cardiology: coronary interventions.

Authors:  Andreas Baumbach; Christos V Bourantas; Patrick W Serruys; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 29.983

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.