| Literature DB >> 31554159 |
Marina Llenas1, Stefania Sandoval2, Pedro M Costa3, Judith Oró-Solé4, Silvia Lope-Piedrafita5,6, Belén Ballesteros7, Khuloud T Al-Jamal8, Gerard Tobias9.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for disease diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) show good performance as transverse relaxation (T2) contrast agents, thus facilitating the interpretation of the acquired images. Attachment of SPION onto nanocarriers prevents their agglomeration, improving the circulation time and efficiency. Graphene derivatives, such as graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO), are appealing nanocarriers since they have both high surface area and functional moieties that make them ideal substrates for the attachment of nanoparticles. We have employed a fast, simple and environmentally friendly microwave-assisted approach for the synthesis of SPION-RGO hybrids. Different iron precursor/GO ratios were used leading to SPION, with a median diameter of 7.1 nm, homogeneously distributed along the RGO surface. Good relaxivity (r2*) values were obtained in MRI studies and no significant toxicity was detected within in vitro tests following GL261 glioma and J774 macrophage-like cells for 24 h with SPION-RGO, demonstrating the applicability of the hybrids as T2-weighted MRI contrast agents.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical imaging; contrast agents; ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
Year: 2019 PMID: 31554159 PMCID: PMC6835838 DOI: 10.3390/nano9101364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Microwave conditions used for the synthesis of SPION-RGO.
| Step | T (°C) | Time (Min) | Max. Power (W) | Max. Pressure (Bar) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 60 | 5 | 300 | 12 |
|
| 180 | 10 | 300 | 12 |
Figure 1Electron microscopy characterization of the SPION-RGO composites. (a) TEM image of SPION-RGO sample prepared by microwave-assisted decomposition of iron (III) acetylacetonate in the presence of graphene oxide. (b) EDX analysis confirming the presence of Fe in the sample (from SPION) along with C (from the RGO). Cu signal arises from the support employed for the analysis. Histograms showing (c) the particle size distribution of the SPION decorating the RGO surface and (d) the area of the RGO sheets. (e) Representative SEM image of the SPION-RGO sample.
Figure 2EFTEM elemental distribution maps of carbon and iron in the SPION-RGO composites.
Figure 3(a) HRTEM image of SPION-RGO and the corresponding SAED pattern (inset), (b) X-ray diffraction pattern of the hybrid material along with the standard diffraction patterns of Fe3O4 (PDF#: 722303) and γ-Fe2O3 (PDF#: 391346), and (c) high resolution Fe 2p X-ray photoelectron spectrum of SPION-RGO.
Figure 4(a) SPION-RGO hysteresis loops (magnetization versus field) at 10 K and (b) saturation magnetization (Ms) of the hybrids with respect to the loading of iron oxide NPs.
Figure 5Phantom MRI studies of SPION-RGO. (a) T2-weighted and (b) T2*-weighted images of SPION-RGO at different concentrations. (c) R2 and (d) R2* relaxation rates versus Fe concentration. The relaxivity values were obtained from the slopes. Results are the mean value ± S.D. (n = 2).
Figure 6TEM images of SPION-RGO hybrids (a,b) before and (c,d) after being exposed to human serum at 37 °C for 24 h.
Figure 7Cell toxicity of SPION-RGO assessed in GL261 glioma and J774 macrophage-like cell lines via modified LDH assay. (a) GL261 and (b) J774 cells after incubation with different concentrations of SPION-RGO for 24 or 72 h. Results (mean ± SD) are expressed as a percentage of cell viability compared to control untreated cells (two different experiments performed with triplicates).