Literature DB >> 31553833

Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis.

Bruce E Sands1, William J Sandborn1, Remo Panaccione1, Christopher D O'Brien1, Hongyan Zhang1, Jewel Johanns1, Omoniyi J Adedokun1, Katherine Li1, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet1, Gert Van Assche1, Silvio Danese1, Stephan Targan1, Maria T Abreu1, Tadakazu Hisamatsu1, Philippe Szapary1, Colleen Marano1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of ustekinumab, an antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis is unknown.
METHODS: We evaluated ustekinumab as 8-week induction therapy and 44-week maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. A total of 961 patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous induction dose of ustekinumab (either 130 mg [320 patients] or a weight-range-based dose that approximated 6 mg per kilogram of body weight [322]) or placebo (319). Patients who had a response to induction therapy 8 weeks after administration of intravenous ustekinumab were randomly assigned again to receive subcutaneous maintenance injections of 90 mg of ustekinumab (either every 12 weeks [172 patients] or every 8 weeks [176]) or placebo (175). The primary end point in the induction trial (week 8) and the maintenance trial (week 44) was clinical remission (defined as a total score of ≤2 on the Mayo scale [range, 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe disease] and no subscore >1 [range, 0 to 3] on any of the four Mayo scale components).
RESULTS: The percentage of patients who had clinical remission at week 8 among patients who received intravenous ustekinumab at a dose of 130 mg (15.6%) or 6 mg per kilogram (15.5%) was significantly higher than that among patients who received placebo (5.3%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among patients who had a response to induction therapy with ustekinumab and underwent a second randomization, the percentage of patients who had clinical remission at week 44 was significantly higher among patients assigned to 90 mg of subcutaneous ustekinumab every 12 weeks (38.4%) or every 8 weeks (43.8%) than among those assigned to placebo (24.0%) (P = 0.002 and P<0.001, respectively). The incidence of serious adverse events with ustekinumab was similar to that with placebo. Through 52 weeks of exposure, there were two deaths (one each from acute respiratory distress syndrome and hemorrhage from esophageal varices) and seven cases of cancer (one each of prostate, colon, renal papillary, and rectal cancer and three nonmelanoma skin cancers) among 825 patients who received ustekinumab and no deaths and one case of cancer (testicular cancer) among 319 patients who received placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab was more effective than placebo for inducing and maintaining remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; UNIFI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02407236.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553833     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  170 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of patients with ulcerative proctitis: Analysis from a large referral centre cohort.

Authors:  Evelyne Dubois; Annick Moens; Rob Geelen; João Sabino; Marc Ferrante; Séverine Vermeire
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Two Strikes but Not Out: Deep Remission of Ulcerative Colitis with Ustekinumab After Primary Non-response to Infliximab and Vedolizumab.

Authors:  Rahul S Dalal; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Matthew J Hamilton; Rachel W Winter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  The Kobe University Human Intestinal Microbiota Model for gut intervention studies.

Authors:  Namiko Hoshi; Jun Inoue; Daisuke Sasaki; Kengo Sasaki
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Difference in treatment outcomes between clinical trials and "real-life" clinical practice: ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Daniela Pugliese; Alessandro Armuzzi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Lack of evidence for the use of ustekinumab for acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Jonathan P Segal; Mohammed Nabil Quraishi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Ustekinumab Does Not Increase Risk of Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Vineet S Rolston; Jessica Kimmel; Violeta Popov; Brian P Bosworth; David Hudesman; Lisa B Malter; Simon Hong; Shannon Chang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  First-Line Biologics or Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Practical Guide for the Clinician.

Authors:  Shannon Chang; David Hudesman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-01-30

Review 8.  Safety of New Biologics (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) and Small Molecules (Tofacitinib) During Pregnancy: A Review.

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; María Chaparro
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  The Complex Interplay Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Malignancy.

Authors:  Jessica Kimmel; Jordan Axelrad
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-02-13

10.  [Update: enterogenic spondylarthritis].

Authors:  Elisabeth Märker-Hermann
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.