Literature DB >> 31553798

Fertility preservation: should we reconsider the terminology?

Michaël Grynberg1,2, Nathalie Sermondade3,4.   

Abstract

The term 'fertility preservation' embraces techniques that are actually mostly based on gamete and gonadal tissue cryopreservation. While the efficiency of these techniques in terms of live births remains difficult to establish, it is remarkable that this ambiguous terminology is routinely used and seems currently well accepted. In order to limit false hopes about the real chances of truly preserving fertility, our medical community should discuss qualifying the term 'fertility preservation'. 'Gamete or gonadal tissue cryopreservation' could appear as a more unambiguous and realistic term. However, it probably captures only a segment of a more global 'fertility preservation' process. Discussing how and when to use which terminology, and even finding a more realistic and unifying term, should be further explored.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Keywords:  fertility potential; fertility preservation; gamete cryopreservation; oocyte cryopreservation; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; safeguarding fertility; terminology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553798     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  1 in total

Review 1.  A Warning Call for Fertility Preservation Methods for Women Undergoing Gonadotoxic Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Claudia Mehedintu; Francesca Frincu; Andreea Carp-Veliscu; Ramona Barac; Dumitru-Cristinel Badiu; Anca Zgura; Monica Cirstoiu; Elvira Bratila; Mihaela Plotogea
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.