| Literature DB >> 31553798 |
Michaël Grynberg1,2, Nathalie Sermondade3,4.
Abstract
The term 'fertility preservation' embraces techniques that are actually mostly based on gamete and gonadal tissue cryopreservation. While the efficiency of these techniques in terms of live births remains difficult to establish, it is remarkable that this ambiguous terminology is routinely used and seems currently well accepted. In order to limit false hopes about the real chances of truly preserving fertility, our medical community should discuss qualifying the term 'fertility preservation'. 'Gamete or gonadal tissue cryopreservation' could appear as a more unambiguous and realistic term. However, it probably captures only a segment of a more global 'fertility preservation' process. Discussing how and when to use which terminology, and even finding a more realistic and unifying term, should be further explored.Keywords: fertility potential; fertility preservation; gamete cryopreservation; oocyte cryopreservation; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; safeguarding fertility; terminology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31553798 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod ISSN: 0268-1161 Impact factor: 6.918