Literature DB >> 31553270

Self-Expanded Metallic Stent Insertion for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Stenting.

Xue Yin1, Dong-Mei Li1, Fang Yang1, Tong-Gang Liu1, Feng-Fei Xia2, Yu-Fei Fu3.   

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to ascertain the relative outcomes in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) undergoing either unilateral or bilateral self-expanded metallic stent (SEMS) insertion. Materials and
Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 93 patients with HCCA were treated through percutaneous insertion of either unilateral or bilateral SEMS during January 2012 to December 2018. We compared technical success, clinical success, and long-term outcomes of the treatment method.
Results: Overall, 51 and 42 patients were treated through unilateral and bilateral SEMS insertion, respectively, with technical success rates of 92.2% (47/51) and 95.3% (40/42), respectively, (P = .859). No patients experienced any procedure-related complications, with unilateral and bilateral clinical success rates of 95.7% (45/47) and 97.4% (38/39), respectively, (P = 1.000) and with comparable adverse event rates between these groups (3/47 vs. 5/40; P = .541). Moreover, 8 and 3 patients treated with unilateral and bilateral stents exhibited stent dysfunction, respectively, (P = .183). In unilateral and bilateral groups, median patency rates were189 and 198 days, respectively, (P = .887). During the follow-up period, all patients died, with respective mean overall survival rates of 222 and 202 days for those treated using unilateral and bilateral stents (P = .755). Both Bismuth type III HCCA (P = .025) and a lack of chemotherapy (P = .000) correlated with reduced survival in univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
Conclusion: Insertion of unilateral and bilateral SEMS exhibits similar clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes in patients with HCCA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hilar cholangiocarcinoma; malignant hilar biliary obstruction; stent

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553270     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent bilateral stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Guo-Ming Gao; Dong-Lu Li; Zhong-Ke Chen
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 1.627

2.  Stent insertion for inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of radioactive and normal stenting.

Authors:  Jia Lin; An-Le Wu; Fei Teng; Yu-Tao Xian; Xin-Jian Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Covered vs bare stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction due to primary common biliary cancer.

Authors:  Ling Tang; Kai-Hu Bao; Yuan-Shun Xu; Peng-Hui Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Stent insertion for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of comparison between unilateral and bilateral stenting.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Pei-Pei Liu; Lu-Lu Yang
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-06

5.  Endoscopic metal stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: an update meta-analysis of unilateral versus bilateral stenting.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Xue-Min Wang; Feng-Fei Xia; Xin-Qiang Han
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.195

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.