Literature DB >> 31552997

Characterising porosity in platinum nanoparticles.

Wenmiao Yu1, Christopher Batchelor-McAuley, Yi-Chi Wang, Shouqi Shao, Simon M Fairclough, Sarah J Haigh, Neil P Young, Richard G Compton.   

Abstract

Accurately determining the morphology and hence the true surface areas of catalytic nanoparticles remains challenging. For many chemically synthesised nanoparticle suspensions conventional BET surface area measurements are often not feasible due to the large quantities of material required. For platinum, a paradigmatic catalyst, this issue is further complicated by the propensity of this metal to form porous aggregate structures comprised of smaller (ca. 2-5 nm) crystallites as opposed to continuous solid structures. This dendritic/porous particulate morphology leads to a large but poorly defined 'active' surface which is difficult to measure accurately. Here we compare, single nanoparticle electrochemistry with three dimensional (3D) electron tomography and quantitative 2D high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analysis to yield insights into the porosity and chemically accessible surface area of a 30 nm diameter commercial Pt nanoparticle catalyst. Good quantitative agreement is found between 2D and 3D STEM-based measurements of the particle morphology, density and size distribution. Both 3D STEM tomography and single nanoparticle electrochemical measurements allow quantification of the surface area but the electrocatalytic surface area is found to be 2.8× larger than is measured in STEM; indicating the importance of the atomic scale roughness and structure (<2 nm) in contributing to the total catalytic surface area of the nanomaterial.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31552997     DOI: 10.1039/c9nr06071e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  4 in total

Review 1.  Analytical Methods for Characterization of Nanomaterial Surfaces.

Authors:  H Surangi N Jayawardena; Sajani H Liyanage; Kavini Rathnayake; Unnati Patel; Mingdi Yan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Selective Enhancement of Surface and Bulk E-Field within Porous AuRh and AuRu Nanorods.

Authors:  Joshua Piaskowski; Alisher Ibragimov; Fedja J Wendisch; Gilles R Bourret
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 4.126

3.  Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study.

Authors:  Otmar Geiss; Ivana Bianchi; Guillaume Bucher; Eveline Verleysen; Frédéric Brassinne; Jan Mast; Katrin Loeschner; Lucas Givelet; Francesco Cubadda; Francesca Ferraris; Andrea Raggi; Francesca Iacoponi; Ruud Peters; Anna Undas; Alexandra Müller; Ann-Katrin Meinhardt; Birgit Hetzer; Volker Gräf; Antonio R Montoro Bustos; Josefa Barrero-Moreno
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 4.  Recent Progress on Revealing 3D Structure of Electrocatalysts Using Advanced 3D Electron Tomography: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Zelin Wang; Xiaoxing Ke; Manling Sui
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.221

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.