| Literature DB >> 31552645 |
Matthias Schröter1,2, Roland Kraemer3,4,5, Roy P Remme6,7, Alexander P E van Oudenhoven8.
Abstract
Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.Keywords: Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem service flows; Service-providing species; Sustainability; Telecoupling
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31552645 PMCID: PMC7067963 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ambio ISSN: 0044-7447 Impact factor: 5.129