Literature DB >> 31552645

Distant regions underpin interregional flows of cultural ecosystem services provided by birds and mammals.

Matthias Schröter1,2, Roland Kraemer3,4,5, Roy P Remme6,7, Alexander P E van Oudenhoven8.   

Abstract

Ecosystem service assessments rarely consider flows between distant regions. Hence, telecoupling effects such as conservation burdens in distant ecosystems are ignored. We identified service-providing species for two cultural ecosystem services (existence and bequest, and birdwatching) and two receiving, i.e. benefitting, regions (Germany, the Netherlands). We delineated and analysed sending, i.e. service-providing, regions on a global scale. The proportion of service-providing species with distant habitats was higher for birdwatching (Germany: 58.6%, Netherlands: 59.4%), than for existence and bequest (Germany: 49.3%, Netherlands: 57.1%). Hotspots of sending regions were predominantly situated in tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas and shrublands and were significantly more threatened and poorer than the global mean. Hotspot protection levels for flows to Germany were higher than the global mean, and lower for the Dutch hotspots. Our findings increase understanding on how distant regions underpin ecosystem services and necessitate interregional assessment as well as conservation efforts.

Keywords:  Biodiversity conservation; Ecosystem service flows; Service-providing species; Sustainability; Telecoupling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31552645      PMCID: PMC7067963          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01261-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  12 in total

1.  Confronting and resolving competing values behind conservation objectives.

Authors:  Daniel S Karp; Chase D Mendenhall; Elizabeth Callaway; Luke O Frishkoff; Peter M Kareiva; Paul R Ehrlich; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation.

Authors:  Allen H Hurlbert; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Using a choice experiment and birder preferences to guide bird-conservation funding.

Authors:  Rochelle Steven; James C R Smart; Clare Morrison; J Guy Castley
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.

Authors:  Kendall R Jones; Oscar Venter; Richard A Fuller; James R Allan; Sean L Maxwell; Pablo Jose Negret; James E M Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Assessing nature's contributions to people.

Authors:  Sandra Díaz; Unai Pascual; Marie Stenseke; Berta Martín-López; Robert T Watson; Zsolt Molnár; Rosemary Hill; Kai M A Chan; Ivar A Baste; Kate A Brauman; Stephen Polasky; Andrew Church; Mark Lonsdale; Anne Larigauderie; Paul W Leadley; Alexander P E van Oudenhoven; Felice van der Plaat; Matthias Schröter; Sandra Lavorel; Yildiz Aumeeruddy-Thomas; Elena Bukvareva; Kirsten Davies; Sebsebe Demissew; Gunay Erpul; Pierre Failler; Carlos A Guerra; Chad L Hewitt; Hans Keune; Sarah Lindley; Yoshihisa Shirayama
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Recreation economics to inform migratory species conservation: Case study of the northern pintail.

Authors:  Brady J Mattsson; James A Dubovsky; Wayne E Thogmartin; Kenneth J Bagstad; Joshua H Goldstein; John B Loomis; James E Diffendorfer; Darius J Semmens; Ruscena Wiederholt; Laura López-Hoffman
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Using Social Media to Measure the Contribution of Red List Species to the Nature-Based Tourism Potential of African Protected Areas.

Authors:  Louise Willemen; Andrew J Cottam; Evangelia G Drakou; Neil D Burgess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Oscar Venter; Eric W Sanderson; Ainhoa Magrach; James R Allan; Jutta Beher; Kendall R Jones; Hugh P Possingham; William F Laurance; Peter Wood; Balázs M Fekete; Marc A Levy; James E M Watson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review.

Authors:  Matthias Schröter; Christian Albert; Alexandra Marques; Wolke Tobon; Sandra Lavorel; Joachim Maes; Claire Brown; Stefan Klotz; Aletta Bonn
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 8.589

10.  The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals.

Authors:  Franck Courchamp; Ivan Jaric; Céline Albert; Yves Meinard; William J Ripple; Guillaume Chapron
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.