| Literature DB >> 31551942 |
Yanchun Wang1, Dongshu Wang1, Xiaojing Wang1, Haoxia Tao1, Erling Feng1, Li Zhu1, Chao Pan1, Bowen Wang1, Chunjie Liu1, Xiankai Liu1, Hengliang Wang1.
Abstract
Genome editing is an effective tool for the functional examination of bacterial genes and for live attenuated vaccine construction. Here, we report a method to edit the genomic DNA of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas)9 system. Using two prophages in B. anthracis as targets, large-fragment deletion mutants were achieved with rates of 100 or 20%. In B. cereus, we successfully introduced precise point mutations into plcR, with phenotypic assays showing that the resulting mutants lost hemolytic and phospholipase enzyme activities similar to B. anthracis, which is a natural plcR mutant. Our study indicates that CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genetic tool for genome editing in the Bacillus cereus group, and can efficiently modify target genes without the need for residual foreign DNA such as antibiotic selection markers. This system could be developed for use in the generation of marker-free live anthrax vaccines or for safer construction of microbiological candidate-based recombinant B. cereus.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus anthracis; Bacillus cereus; Bacillus cereus sensu lato group; CRISPR/Cas9; genomic site-specific mutagenesis; large genomic deletion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31551942 PMCID: PMC6736576 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Plasmids and strains used in this study.
| pJOE8999 | CRISPR-Cas9 vector; KanR | |
| pJOE-Lam01 | pJOE8999 with sgRNA-lam01 and homologous arms of lam01 from | This study |
| pJOE-Lam03 | pJOE8999 with sgRNA-lam03 and homologous arms of lam03 from | This study |
| pJHRT | pJOE8999 with sgRNA-plcR and homologous arms of | This study |
| pXO1+pXO2–, China vaccine strain | This laboratory | |
| A16R excision prophage lambdaBa01 | This study | |
| A16R excision prophage lambdaBa03 | This study | |
| pXO1+pXO2–, deriving from A16 (pXO1+pXO2+) | ||
| Wild-type | This laboratory | |
| This study | ||
| DH5α | Cloning strain | CWBIO, China |
| SCS110 | Transgen, China | |
Primers used in this study.
| Ulam03F | ACGC | PCR of homology arms for lambdaBa03 excision |
| Ulam03R | TTT | |
| Dlam03F | TTT | |
| Dlam03R | GC | |
| sg-lam03F | tacgAACTAAGAAGGATATTCCAA | Target sequence for lambdaBa03 excision |
| sg-lam03R | aaacTTGGAATATCCTTCTTAGTT | |
| lam03p1 | CCTGGGATTGATGATACGATGGC | PCR of lambdaBa03 excision mutant identification |
| lam03p2 | TTGGTTTCGACGTAACTGACCAAG | |
| lam03p3 | CCAAAATCAGCTGTAGCGATATTC | |
| lam03p4 | TATCCATATAATGAGTTTTTTCTGCTTT | |
| lam03p5 | CCTTCCTCGGCTTCTTCCATTG | |
| Ulam01F | ACGC | PCR of homology arms for lambdaBa01 excision |
| Ulam01R | TTT | |
| Dlam01F | TTT | |
| Dlam01R | GC | |
| sg-lam01F | tacgTTAGACCCTCTACTACCAAG | Target sequence for lambdaBa01 excision |
| sg-lam01R | aaacCTTGGTAGTAGAGGGTCTAA | |
| lam01p1 | TAAGCAATAATACATAGCAACAAACC | PCR of lambdaBa01 excision mutant identification |
| lam01p2 | GTAATTTTCCCTTGGACAGCTG | |
| lam01p3 | AAAGTGCAGCACCTACACTGAAAC | |
| lam01p4 | AGTTTTCGATGAACTCAATGGCATG | |
| lam01p5 | ATATTTTCAAAGAAATAAAAGCCC | |
| sg-plcRF | tacgAGGTGAATGCCTAGGGAAGT | Target sequence for site-specific mutagenesis of |
| sg-plcRR | aaacACTTCCCTAGGCATTCACCT | |
| pJOEF | TAGTGTAGCCGTAGTTAGG | PCR identification of the introduction of pJHRT into HN001 |
| pJOER | AAAGGGAATGAGAATAGTG | |
| plcRHMF | CTTCTGTTGATAAAGGGCAAAGAAG | PCR of |
| plcRHMR | TTTAAAGTGATTGCAGAAGGTGTA |
FIGURE 1Schematic representation of genome engineering in B. anthracis and B. cereus via the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The all-in-one CRISPR-Cas9 plasmids based on pJOE consist of Cas9, sgRNA, and upstream and downstream homologous arms that serve as donor DNA. Transcription of the sgRNA allows the Cas9 protein to cleave at a specific site in the genome. The desired mutation is then achieved by recombination between donor DNA and the genome.
FIGURE 2PCR-based verification of lambdaBa03 deletion in B. anthracis A16R. (A) Fragments amplified using primer pair lam03p1/lam03p2. The expected fragment in the mutant strain was approximately 2.2 kb (lanes 2–9). The fragment in the wild-type strain was > 19 kb, which exceeds the maximum amplification size under the PCR conditions used in this study (lane 1). (B,C) Fragments amplified using primer sets lam03p1/lam03p3 and lam03p4/lam03p5, respectively. Because of the location of the primers (D), the expected fragments (1.6 or 0.6 kb, respectively) could only be amplified from the wild-type strain (lane 1) when the last two primer pairs were used for PCR (lane 1, A16R; lanes 2–4, mutant strains). (E) Sequencing data comparing wild-type strain A16R with the lambdaBa03 deletion mutant.
FIGURE 3PCR verification of lambdaBa01 deletion in B. anthracis A16R. (A) Fragments amplified using primer pair lam01p1/lam01p2. The expected fragment in the mutant strain was approximately 2.8 kb (lanes 5, 7). (B) Fragments amplified using primer pairs lam01p1/lam01p3 and lam01p4/lam01p5. (C) Because of the location of the primers (D), the expected fragments (1.6 or 0.7 kb, respectively) could only be amplified from the wild-type strain (lane 1) and not from the mutants (lanes 2 and 3). (E) Sequencing data comparing wild-type strain A16R with the lambdaBa01 deletion mutant.
FIGURE 4Verification of site-specific mutagenesis of plcR in B. cereus HN001. (A) Selection of positive mutants using hemolysin assays. Clones indicated by blue arrows are candidates with poor hemolytic activity. (B) PCR-amplified fragment of plcR for sequencing. (C) Sequence analysis of plcR from the putative mutant clones and the wild-type strain HN001. All three candidate clones contained the G640T point mutation.
FIGURE 5Phenotypic analysis of B. cereus HN1M. (A) Hemolytic activity assay. (B) Phospholipase activity assay. Similar to B. anthracis, the hemolytic enzyme activity of positive mutants was partially lost, while phospholipase activity was completely lost. Different strain locations are shown. 1. B. cereus HN001, 2. B. anthracis A16PI2, 3–5. B. cereus HN1M.