| Literature DB >> 31551786 |
Tianqi Tao1, Tao He1, Xiaoreng Wang1, Xiuhua Liu1.
Abstract
Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is one of the effective complementary and alternative therapies used to improve the prognosis of CHD patients. Xuefu Zhuyu (XFZY) decoction, a classical traditional Chinese medication for regulating Qi and promoting blood circulation, has a clinical benefit in CHD; however, the underlying mechanism is not clear. Recently, it was found that the metabolites involved in amino acid metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid cycle were altered in CHD patients with Qi and Yin deficiency syndrome. To understand the material foundation of Qi, it is of great significance to study the differential metabolites involved in Qi during treatment of CHD with Qi-regulating and blood-promoting herbs. In this study, we investigated the metabolic profiles of serum in CHD patients by nontargeted metabolomics analysis to detect differential metabolites between the XFZY decoction group and placebo group. Ten CHD patients were enrolled and treated with placebo granules or XFZY decoction granules in a random and double-blind manner. Serum samples of all patients were evaluated by untargeted high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. In total, 513 metabolites were detected in the serum of CHD patients, and six of these metabolites participating in seven metabolic pathways were significantly different between CHD patients treated with XFZY decoction and the placebo group. Among the six differential metabolites, FA (20:2)-H and tetracarboxylic acid (24:0), involved in fatty acid metabolism; cis-aconitic acid, which participates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle; 2-deoxy-D-glucose, involved in glucose metabolism; and N-acetylglycine, involved in amino acid metabolism, were decreased, whereas spermine, which participates in amino acid metabolism, was increased as compared with the placebo group. Our findings, combined with the perspective of biological functions, indicate that 2-deoxy-D-glucose and spermine might constitute the partial material foundation of Qi in CHD patients treated with XFZY decoction.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; Xuefu Zhuyu decoction; coronary heart disease; ethnopharmacology; metabolomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31551786 PMCID: PMC6746894 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1The orthogonal projection to latent structure-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score plots compared the Xuefu Zhuyu decoction group to the placebo group. The left image is the two-dimensional graph of the OPLS-DA score plots, and the right image is the three-dimensional graph of the OPLS-DA score plots. The placebo group is shown in green, and the Xuefu Zhuyu decoction group is shown in red.
Differential metabolites between the XFZY group and placebo group patients from LC-MS/MS analysis.
| Differential metabolite | Related metabolism | ESI mode | Mass (m/z) | RT (min) | FC (XFZY/placebo) | VIP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetracosanoic acid (24:0) | Fatty acid metabolism | Neg | 367.358 | 14.85 | 0.46 | 2.40596 | 0.008 |
| N-acetylglycine | Amino acid metabolism | Pos | 118.050 | 8.29 | 0.44 | 2.28626 | 0.015 |
| FA(20:2)-H | Fatty acid metabolism | Neg | 307.264 | 13.25 | 0.78 | 2.21854 | 0.020 |
| 2-deoxy-D-glucose | Glucose metabolism | Neg | 163.061 | 1.04 | 0.50 | 2.03138 | 0.039 |
| Spermine | Amino acid metabolism | Pos | 203.223 | 8.76 | 3.08 | 1.99192 | 0.045 |
| cis-aconitic acid | Glucose metabolism | Neg | 173.009 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 1.9734 | 0.048 |
XFZY, Xuefu Zhuyu decoction; ESI, election spray ionization; RT, retention time; VIP, variable importance in the projection; P, probability; FC, fold change; Pos, positive; Neg, negative; FA, fatty acid.
Figure 2The six differential metabolites in the two groups are shown in the heat map using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (A: placebo group; B: Xuefu Zhuyu decoction group). The row represents the metabolites, and the column represents the individual samples. Red bands indicate upregulated metabolites, and blue bands indicate downregulated metabolites in the two groups. The deeper the color, the greater the difference in metabolites.
Figure 3The disturbed metabolic pathways showed differential metabolites changed in the Xuefu Zhuyu decoction group as compared with the placebo group by MetaboAnalyst 4.0 software. Node radius was based on pathway impact values. Node color was based on P value.
Differential metabolic pathway between the XFZY group and placebo group.
| Pathway name | Match status | Match metabolites |
|---|---|---|
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 1/20 | cis-aconitic acid |
| β-alanine metabolism | 1/28 | Spermine |
| Glycerolipid metabolism | 1/32 | Fatty acid |
| Glutathione metabolism | 1/38 | Spermine |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 1/50 | cis-aconitic acid |
| Fatty acid metabolism | 1/50 | Fatty acid |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 1/77 | Spermine |
XFZY, Xuefu Zhuyu decoction; TCA cycle, tricarboxylic acid cycle; match status, the number of accumulated metabolites/the number of all metabolites in metabolic pathways.
Botanical compositions of Xuefu Zhuyu decoction.
| Herb (local name) | Medicinal parts | Amount in application (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Seed | 12 | |
| Root | 15 | |
| Root | 10 | |
| Flower | 10 | |
| Root | 10 | |
| Root | 15 | |
| Fruit | 6 | |
| Root | 3 | |
| Root | 4.5 | |
| Root | 9 | |
| Root | 6 |
All components in Xuefu Zhuyu decoction granules were fully validated using http://mpns.kew.org/mpns-portal/?_ga=1.111763972.1427522246.1459077346.
Baseline characteristics of patients.
| Placebo (n = 5) | XFZY (n = 5) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (F/M) | 2/3 | 1/4 | 0.690 |
| Age, years | 54.4 ± 5.73 | 57 ± 15.84 | 0.739 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 28.26 ± 6.62 | 28.49 ± 3.71 | 0.946 |
| Blood pressure, mmHg | |||
| SBP | 126.80 ± 15.40 | 133.60 ± 11.61 | 0.453 |
| DBP | 86.80 ± 6.42 | 82 ± 8.37 | 0.339 |
| Heart rate, beats/min | 67.20 ± 5.22 | 71.40 ± 15.19 | 0.575 |
| Library data | |||
| RBC, ×1012/L | 4.78 ± 0.08 | 5.12 ± 0.42 | 0.153 |
| HGB, g/L | 140.4 ± 7.57 | 159 ± 16.02 | 0.047* |
| WBC, ×109/L | 6.03 ± 1.98 | 7.08 ± 2.34 | 0.465 |
| NE, % | 64.94 ± 9.80 | 63.99 ± 4.54 | 0.849 |
| PLT, ×109/L | 231 ± 47.43 | 231.6 ± 92.69 | 0.990 |
| AST, U/L | 20.18 ± 4.98 | 20.86 ± 7.06 | 0.865 |
| ALT, U/L | 22.80 ± 10.51 | 27.40 ± 8.86 | 0.476 |
| SCr, μmoI/L | 68.34 ± 23.38 | 82.08 ± 15.89 | 0.309 |
| UA, μmoI/L | 319.74 ± 90.24 | 319.84 ± 24.85 | 0.998 |
| BUN, mmoI/L | 4.63 ± 1.20 | 5.31 ± 1.23 | 0.399 |
| TG, mmol/L | 2.22 ± 1.15 | 1.32 ± 0.38 | 0.135 |
| CHOL, mmol/L | 3.07 ± 1.59 | 4.48 ± 0.68 | 0.106 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.29 ± 0.48 | 1.18 ± 0.12 | 0.630 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 1.94 ± 0.47 | 2.70 ± 0.74 | 0.088 |
| Glu, mmol/L | 4.83 ± 0.37 | 5.64 ± 0.59 | 0.031* |
| PT, s | 13.18 ± 0.63 | 12.52 ± 0.98 | 0.242 |
| APTT, s | 37.84 ± 1.63 | 32.94 ± 3.14 | 0.015* |
| FIB, g/L | 2.84 ± 0.35 | 3.19 ± 0.44 | 0.201 |
| TT, s | 16.68 ± 0.66 | 16.72 ± 1.58 | 0.960 |
Values are mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus placebo group.