| Literature DB >> 31551752 |
Feng-Tzu Chen1, Ya-Ping Chen2, Stefan Schneider3, Shih-Chun Kao4, Chih-Mao Huang5,6, Yu-Kai Chang1,7.
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the importance of regular exercise on cognitive function in aging populations, with aerobic exercise and cardiovascular fitness having received the largest amount of research attention. However, the relationship between exercise mode and cognitive function underlying behavioral modification and neural activation remains unknown. The present study, therefore, sought to examine the associations between different exercise modes and the working memory (WM) aspect of executive function as well as its task-evoked brain activation in the late middle-aged population. Seventy late middle-aged adults were classified into open-skill, closed-skill, or irregular exercise groups based on their participation in exercise activities prior to the study and then performed a spatial working memory (SWM) task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning. The results revealed that exercise groups, regardless of exercise modes, showed better SWM and physical fitness performance. Additionally, the open-skill group exhibited greater brain activation in the prefrontal lobe, anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area (ACC/SMA), and hippocampus than those in the closed-skill group, suggesting a mode-sensitive compensatory mechanism in late middle-aged adults. These findings indicate that exercise promotes cognitive health, improves WM, and enhances neurocognitive scaffolding in late middle-aged adults and further suggest that various exercise modes can effectively modulate frontal and hippocampal function in the face of age-related neurocognitive declines, implications that may inform the development of exercise programs for the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: aging; closed-skill exercise; cognition; executive control; open-skill exercise
Year: 2019 PMID: 31551752 PMCID: PMC6737283 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Figure 1Example of experimental stimuli and procedure for spatial working memory (SWM) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm.
Participant characteristics and physical fitness indices across the three groups (mean ± standard deviation).
| Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-skill | Closed-skill | Irreg. exercise | |
| Total/Female (%) | 23/4 (17%) | 24/15 (63%) | 23/11 (48%) |
| Age (years) | 57.17 ± 3.23 | 59.08 ± 7.15 | 58.91 ± 4.77 |
| Weight (kg) | 71.48 ± 10.68a | 63.00 ± 10.53 | 64.17 ± 10.58 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.59 ± 3.11 | 24.20 ± 2.77 | 24.33 ± 3.02 |
| Education (years) | 13.74 ± 2.03 | 12.46 ± 3.75 | 12.48 ± 4.34 |
| MMSE | 28.09 ± 1.62 | 27.54 ± 2.15 | 27.00 ± 3.00 |
| Digit Span | 20.09 ± 3.77 | 18.71 ± 4.47 | 19.91 ± 4.23 |
| Years (regular) | 15.20 ± 10.19 | 8.79 ± 5.14 | N/A |
| Duration/session (min) | 99.13 ± 30.59 | 79.17 ± 43.63 | N/A |
| Frequency/week | 3.26 ± 1.36 | 5.29 ± 1.52 | N/A |
| IPAQ | 1,476.59 ± 981.00a | 1,869.42 ± 1,033.93a, c | 420.95 ± 439.29 |
| Cardiovascular fitness | 72.38 ± 11.75a | 70.80 ± 9.28a | 60.53 ± 6.26 |
| Muscular strength | |||
| Right hand | 42.87 ± 12.85a,b | 33.06 ± 10.40 | 35.48 ± 10.29 |
| Left hand | 41.77 ± 7.36a,b | 31.17 ± 8.94 | 33.67 ± 9.62 |
| Muscular endurance | |||
| Push-up | 13.91 ± 10.21a,b | 7.35 ± 5.26 | 4.39 ± 4.97 |
| ASU 30 | 16.14 ± 5.38a,b | 9.39 ± 6.53 | 7.30 ± 4.90 |
| ASU 60 | 26.73 ± 9.36a,b | 15.96 ± 11.93 | 12.26 ± 8.44 |
| Flexibility (cm) | 15.64 ± 11.55 | 25.13 ± 10.46c | 21.57 ± 11.56 |
| Agility (ms) | 12.18 ± 1.59a,b | 16.68 ± 3.18 | 18.22 ± 3.18 |
| Power (cm) | 45.86 ± 12.80a,b | 28.87 ± 9.32 | 30.76 ± 11.25 |
Notes: BMI, Body mass index; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire; ASU 30, abdominal sit-ups of 30 s; ASU 60, abdominal sit-ups of 60 s; .
Behavioral performance in spatial working memory task across the three groups.
| Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conditions | Open-skill | Closed-skill | Irreg. exercise |
| 1-dot | 94.87 ± 4.92* | 91.33 ± 8.29* | 89.82 ± 10.35 |
| 3-dot | 78.65 ± 7.87* | 76.54 ± 11.96* | 71.39 ± 13.20 |
| 7-dot | 62.00 ± 9.51* | 61.04 ± 8.11* | 53.52 ± 8.91 |
| 1-dot | 821.39 ± 36.05 | 850.36 ± 32.01 | 844.51 ± 35.87 |
| 3-dot | 1,033.79 ± 44.24 | 1,090.78 ± 34.54 | 1,038.56 ± 35.59 |
| 7-dot | 1,156.80 ± 44.07 | 1,188.16 ± 30.86 | 1,174.11 ± 43.09 |
Note: *indicates significant difference compared to the irregular exercise group, .
Figure 2Global accuracy and response time (RT) behavioral performance results (mean and standard error) for the spatial working memory (WM) task across the three groups. Open-skill, open-skill exercise group; closed-skill, closed-skill exercise group; Irregular ex., irregular exercise group. *Indicates significant difference between groups, p < 0.05.
Figure 3Brain activation during spatial WM task for each group and each condition (≧ 10 contiguous voxels with FWE p < 0.05 correction).
Brain regions showing group differences in neural activation during spatial working memory task.
| Open-skill | Closed-skill | Irreg. exercise | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFG | −32 | 22 | 4 | 4.33 ± 2.29b | 3.35 ± 3.49 | 3.49 ± 2.52 |
| ACC/SMA | −8 | 8 | 48 | 2.79 ± 1.95b | 1.97 ± 1.29 | 2.68 ± 2.04 |
| Thalamus | −6 | 26 | −4 | 3.28 ± 2.46b | 1.82 ± 2.19 | 2.42 ± 2.10 |
| Putamen | −20 | 10 | 4 | 2.88 ± 2.62b | 1.74 ± 1.83 | 2.17 ± 2.33 |
| DLPF | −34 | −4 | 48 | 3.47 ± 2.07 | 3.23 ± 1.88 | 3.39 ± 2.21 |
| Hippocampus | 8 | −26 | −6 | 3.40 ± 2.46a,b | 1.62 ± 1.83a | 2.53 ± 1.97b |
| IFG | 32 | 22 | 6 | 1.29 ± 1.64 | 1.16 ± 1.19 | 1.17 ± 1.65 |
| Thalamus | 14 | −22 | 6 | 1.68 ± 1.66 | 1.25 ± 1.52 | 1.37 ± 1.92 |
| Putamen | 20 | 8 | 0 | 2.91 ± 2.47 | 2.07 ± 1.87 | 2.48 ± 2.38 |
Notes: IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ACC/SMA, anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area; DLPF, dorsolateral prefrontal; .
Brain regions showing condition-related differences in neural activation during spatial working memory task.
| 1-dot | 3-dot | 7-dot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFG | −32 | 22 | 4 | 2.81 ± 2.03 | 4.04 ± 2.12a | 4.30 ± 2.56a |
| ACC/SMA | −8 | 8 | 48 | 2.05 ± 1.57 | 2.67 ± 1.83a | 2.71 ± 1.96a |
| Thalamus | −6 | 26 | −4 | 2.10 ± 2.16 | 2.54 ± 2.20 | 2.85 ± 2.55a,b |
| Putamen | −20 | 10 | 4 | 1.30 ± 1.97 | 2.64 ± 2.12a | 2.88 ± 2.52a |
| DLPF | −34 | −4 | 48 | 2.63 ± 1.81 | 3.67 ± 2.17a | 3.87 ± 2.43a |
| Hippocampus | 8 | −26 | −6 | 2.11 ± 2.08 | 2.46 ± 2.15 | 2.94 ± 2.35a,b |
| IFG | 32 | 22 | 6 | 0.82 ± 1.40 | 1.17 ± 1.44a | 1.64 ± 1.56a,b |
| Thalamus | 14 | −22 | 6 | 1.23 ± 1.59 | 1.46 ± 1.80 | 1.60 ± 1.72 |
| Putamen | 20 | 8 | 0 | 1.58 ± 2.04 | 2.85 ± 2.06a | 3.01 ± 2.42a |
Notes: IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ACC/SMA, anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area; DLPF, dorsolateral prefrontal; .