| Literature DB >> 31551688 |
Alfonso Grimaldi1, Natalia Pediconi1, Francesca Oieni2, Rocco Pizzarelli1, Maria Rosito1, Maria Giubettini3, Tiziana Santini1, Cristina Limatola2,4, Giancarlo Ruocco1,5, Davide Ragozzino2,4, Silvia Di Angelantonio1,2.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD), a primary cause of dementia in the aging population, is characterized by extracellular amyloid-beta peptides aggregation, intracellular deposits of hyperphosphorylated tau, neurodegeneration and glial activation in the brain. It is commonly thought that the lack of early diagnostic criteria is among the main causes of pharmacological therapy and clinical trials failure; therefore, the actual challenge is to define new biomarkers and non-invasive technologies to measure neuropathological changes in vivo at pre-symptomatic stages. Recent evidences obtained from human samples and mouse models indicate the possibility to detect protein aggregates and other pathological features in the retina, paving the road for non-invasive rapid detection of AD biomarkers. Here, we report the presence of amyloid beta plaques, tau tangles, neurodegeneration and detrimental astrocyte and microglia activation according to a disease associated microglia phenotype (DAM). Thus, we propose the human retina as a useful site for the detection of cellular and molecular changes associated with Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; astrocytes; beta-amyloid; human; microglia; neurodegeneration; retina; tau
Year: 2019 PMID: 31551688 PMCID: PMC6737046 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
FIGURE 1Human AD retina displays β-amyloid and pTau aggregates. (A) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control cases immunolabeled with anti-β-amyloid antibody (green) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (B) Insert representing β-amyloid staining in AD retina at higher magnification; bar 20 μm (C) Number of β-amyloid plaques/field of view (∗∗p < 0.01 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 45/5 fields/patients). (D) Distribution of β-amyloid plaque volume measured in AD patients and control cases. (E) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control cases immunolabeled with anti-p-tau AT-100 antibody (green) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (F) Quantification of p-tau AT-100 area covered by fluorescent signal/field of view (∗∗∗p < 0.001 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 38/6 fields/patients). (G) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control immunolabeled with anti-p-tau AT-100 (green) and anti-TUJ1 as RGC marker (red) at higher magnification (Hoechst for nuclei visualization in blue; bar 20 μm). IL, inner layer; OL, outer layer.
FIGURE 2Ganglion cell neuron degeneration in AD patient’s retina. (A) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control cases immunolabeled with anti-cleaved caspase-3 antibody (green), anti-TUJ1 as RGC marker (red) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (B) Bar chart representing the percentage of RGC neuron positive for cleaved caspase-3 on each field of view (∗p < 0.05 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 17/4 fields/patients). IL, inner layer; OL, outer layer.
FIGURE 3Increased astrocytes and microglia cell density in the retina of AD patients. (A) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control cases immunolabeled with anti-GFAP antibody (red) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (B) Quantification of GFAP area covered by fluorescent signal/field of view (∗∗∗∗p < 0.001 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 44/6 fields/patients). (C) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control cases immunolabeled with anti-Iba1 antibody (red) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (D) Quantification of Iba1 area covered by fluorescent signal/field of view (∗∗∗p < 0.005 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 73/10 fields/patients). IL, inner layer; OL, outer layer.
FIGURE 4AD patient’s retina display complement C3 and IL-1β upregulation. (A) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients (bottom) and control cases (top) immunolabeled with anti-IL-1β antibody (green), Iba1 (red) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (B) Quantification of cells positive for both Iba1 and IL-1β signal/field of view (∗p < 0.05 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 31/5 fields/patients). (C) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients and control cases immunolabeled with anti-GFAP antibody (red), C3 (green) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (D) Quantification of GFAP/C3 co-localization area/field of view (∗∗∗∗p < 0.001 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 45/6 fields/patients). IL, inner layer; OL, outer layer.
FIGURE 5Osteopontin and TREM2 expression in AD patient’s retina. (A) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients (bottom) and control cases (top) immunolabeled with anti-OPN (green), tuj-1 (red) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. (B) Quantification of OPN area covered by fluorescent signal/field of view (∗∗∗∗p < 0.001 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 24/3 fields/patients). (C) Quantification of OPN/TUJ1 co-localization area/field of view, in% (∗∗p < 0.01 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 36/6 fields/patients). (D) Representative images of retinal slices from AD patients (bottom) and control cases (top) stained with anti TREM2 mRNA fluorescent probe (red), anti-Iba1 (green) and Hoechst for nuclei visualization (blue); bar 20 μm. Note that cells expressing TREM2 are not always positive for Iba1. (E) Number of TREM2 positive cells/field of view (∗p < 0.05 AD vs. Ctrl; t-test; n = 31/4 fields/patients). IL, inner layer; OL, outer layer.