Literature DB >> 31551364

Tomoelastography Distinguishes Noninvasively between Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions.

Mehrgan Shahryari1, Heiko Tzschätzsch1, Jing Guo1, Stephan R Marticorena Garcia1, Georg Böning1, Uli Fehrenbach1, Lisa Stencel1, Patrick Asbach1, Bernd Hamm1, Joseph A Käs2, Jürgen Braun3, Timm Denecke4, Ingolf Sack5.   

Abstract

Patients with increased liver stiffness have a higher risk of developing cancer, however, the role of fluid-solid tissue interactions and their contribution to liver tumor malignancy remains elusive. Tomoelastography is a novel imaging method for mapping quantitatively the solid-fluid tissue properties of soft tissues in vivo. It provides high resolution and thus has clear clinical applications. In this work we used tomoelastography in 77 participants, with a total of 141 focal liver lesions of different etiologies, to investigate the contributions of tissue stiffness and fluidity to the malignancy of liver tumors. Shear-wave speed (c) as surrogate for tissue stiffness and phase-angle (φ) of the complex shear modulus reflecting tissue fluidity were abnormally high in malignant tumors and allowed them to be distinguished from nontumorous liver tissue with high accuracy [c: AUC = 0.88 with 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-0.94; φ: AUC = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92-0.98]. Benign focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma could be distinguished from malignant lesions on the basis of tumor stiffness (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98; sensitivity = 94%, 95% CI = 89-100; and specificity = 85%, 95% CI = 62-100), tumor fluidity (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77-0.96; sensitivity = 83%, 95% CI = 72-93; and specificity = 92%, 95% CI = 77-100) and liver stiffness (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74-0.94; sensitivity = 72%, 95% CI = 59-83; and specificity = 88%, 95% CI = 69-100), but not on the basis of liver fluidity. Together, hepatic malignancies are characterized by stiff, yet fluid tissue properties, whereas surrounding nontumorous tissue is dominated by solid properties. Tomoelastography can inform noninvasively on the malignancy of suspicious liver lesions by differentiating between benign and malignant lesions with high sensitivity based on stiffness and with high specificity based on fluidity. SIGNIFICANCE: Solid-fluid tissue properties measured by tomoelastography can distinguish malignant from benign masses with high accuracy and provide quantitative noninvasive imaging biomarkers for liver tumors. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31551364     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  12 in total

1.  Understanding Factors Governing Distribution Volume of Ethyl Cellulose-Ethanol to Optimize Ablative Therapy in the Liver.

Authors:  Robert Morhard; Jenna L Mueller; Qishun Tang; Corrine Nief; Erika Chelales; Christopher T Lam; Daniel Adrianzen Alvarez; Michael Rubinstein; David F Katz; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 2.  Can't handle the stress? Mechanobiology and disease.

Authors:  Noam Zuela-Sopilniak; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 15.272

Review 3.  Collective Cell Migration on Collagen-I Networks: The Impact of Matrix Viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Ivana Pajic-Lijakovic; Milan Milivojevic; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-04

4.  Added Value of Viscoelasticity for MRI-Based Prediction of Ki-67 Expression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Deep Learning Combined Radiomics (DLCR) Model.

Authors:  Xumei Hu; Jiahao Zhou; Yan Li; Yikun Wang; Jing Guo; Ingolf Sack; Weibo Chen; Fuhua Yan; Ruokun Li; Chengyan Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Imaging Modalities for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Katherina P Farr; Daniel Moses; Koroush S Haghighi; Phoebe A Phillips; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Boon H Chua
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Tomoelastography based on multifrequency MR elastography predicts liver function reserve in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Huimin Lin; Yihuan Wang; Jiahao Zhou; Yuchen Yang; Xinxin Xu; Di Ma; Yongjun Chen; Chunxue Yang; Ingolf Sack; Jing Guo; Ruokun Li; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 7.  Physical traits of cancer.

Authors:  Hadi T Nia; Lance L Munn; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Spatial heterogeneity of hepatic fibrosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis vs. viral hepatitis assessed by MR elastography.

Authors:  Rolf Reiter; Mehrgan Shahryari; Heiko Tzschätzsch; Dieter Klatt; Britta Siegmund; Bernd Hamm; Jürgen Braun; Ingolf Sack; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rectal Tumor Stiffness Quantified by In Vivo Tomoelastography and Collagen Content Estimated by Histopathology Predict Tumor Aggressiveness.

Authors:  Jiaxi Hu; Jing Guo; Yigang Pei; Ping Hu; Mengsi Li; Ingolf Sack; Wenzheng Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Tomoelastography for non-invasive detection of ameloblastoma and metastatic neck lymph nodes.

Authors:  Marie Beier; Ingolf Sack; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Bernd Hamm; Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena Garcia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.