Literature DB >> 31551253

Therapeutic Implications of p53 Status on Cancer Cell Fate Following Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and the DNA-PK Inhibitor M3814.

Qing Sun1, Yige Guo1, Xiaohong Liu1, Frank Czauderna1, Michael I Carr1, Frank T Zenke2, Andree Blaukat2, Lyubomir T Vassilev3.   

Abstract

Inhibition of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in cancer cells has been proposed as a new therapeutic strategy for potentiating the anticancer effects of radiotherapy. M3814 is a novel, selective pharmacologic inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), a key driver of nonhomologous end-joining, one of the main DSB-repair pathways, currently under clinical investigation. Here, we show that M3814 effectively blocks the repair of radiation-induced DSBs and potently enhances p53 phosphorylation and activation. In p53 wild-type cells, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and its targets, p53 and checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2), were more strongly activated by combination treatment with M3814 and radiation than by radiation alone, leading to a complete p53-dependent cell-cycle block and premature cell senescence. Cancer cells with dysfunctional p53 were unable to fully arrest their cell cycle and entered S and M phases with unrepaired DNA, leading to mitotic catastrophe and apoptotic cell death. Isogenic p53-null/wild-type A549 and HT-1080 cell lines were generated and used to demonstrate that p53 plays a critical role in determining the response to ionizing radiation and M3814. Time-lapse imaging of cell death and measuring apoptosis in panels of p53 wild-type and p53-null/mutant cancer lines confirmed the clear differences in cell fate, dependent on p53 status. IMPLICATIONS: Our results identify p53 as a possible biomarker for response of cancer cells to combination treatment with radiation and a DNA-PK inhibitor and suggest that p53 mutation status should be considered in the design of future clinical trials. VISUAL OVERVIEW: http://mcr.aacrjournals.org/content/molcanres/17/12/2457/F1.large.jpg. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31551253     DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  17 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Lethality through the Lens of Medicinal Chemistry.

Authors:  Samuel H Myers; Jose Antonio Ortega; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  DNA-PK Inhibition and Radiation Promote Antitumoral Immunity through RNA Polymerase III in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Weiwei Wang; Matthew T McMillan; Zhuwen Wang; Michael D Green; Qiang Zhang; Xinyi Zhao; Long Jiang; David Karnak; Fatima Lima; Joshua D Parsels; Leslie A Parsels; Theodore S Lawrence; Timothy L Frankel; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.333

3.  DNA-PK inhibitor peposertib enhances p53-dependent cytotoxicity of DNA double-strand break inducing therapy in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Eric Haines; Yuki Nishida; Michael Andreeff; Lyubomir T Vassilev; Michael I Carr; Rafael Heinz Montoya; Lauren B Ostermann; Weiguo Zhang; Frank T Zenke; Andree Blaukat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer.

Authors:  Rui-Xue Huang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 5.  Druggable binding sites in the multicomponent assemblies that characterise DNA double-strand-break repair through non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Antonia Kefala Stavridi; Robert Appleby; Shikang Liang; Tom L Blundell; Amanda K Chaplin
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 8.000

6.  Dual inhibition of DNA-PK and DNA polymerase theta overcomes radiation resistance induced by p53 deficiency.

Authors:  Rashmi J Kumar; Hui Xiao Chao; Dennis A Simpson; Wanjuan Feng; Min-Guk Cho; Victoria R Roberts; Aurora R Sullivan; Sonam J Shah; Anne-Sophie Wozny; Katerina Fagan-Solis; Sunil Kumar; Adam Luthman; Dale A Ramsden; Jeremy E Purvis; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2020-12-21

7.  Inhibition of DNA-PK may improve response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mary Smithson; Regina K Irwin; Gregory Williams; M Chandler McLeod; E Karen Choi; Anutosh Ganguly; Ashley Pepple; Clifford S Cho; Christopher D Willey; Judith Leopold; Karin M Hardiman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.218

Review 8.  DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ruixue Huang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-07-09

Review 9.  Targeting the replication stress response through synthetic lethal strategies in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Natalie Y L Ngoi; Melissa M Pham; David S P Tan; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 10.  Beyond DNA Repair: DNA-PKcs in Tumor Metastasis, Metabolism and Immunity.

Authors:  Haitang Yang; Feng Yao; Thomas M Marti; Ralph A Schmid; Ren-Wang Peng
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.