Renuka Tipirneni1, Minal R Patel1, Susan D Goold1, Edith C Kieffer1, John Z Ayanian1, Sarah J Clark1, Sunghee Lee1, Corey Bryant1, Matthias A Kirch1, Erica Solway1, Jamie Luster1, Maryn Lewallen1, Kara Zivin1. 1. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (Tipirneni, Patel, Goold, Kieffer, Ayanian, Clark, Lee, Bryant, Kirch, Solway), School of Public Health (Patel), School of Social Work (Kieffer), Child Health Evaluation and Research Center (Clark), and Institute for Social Research (Lee), all at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Internal Medicine (Tipirneni, Goold, Ayanian, Bryant, Luster), Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (Lewallen), and Department of Psychiatry (Zivin), all at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor (Zivin).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on health and employment outcomes among enrollees with and without a behavioral health disorder (either a mental or substance use disorder). METHODS: Between January and October 2016, the authors conducted a telephone survey of 4,090 enrollees in the Michigan Medicaid expansion program and identified 2,040 respondents (48.3%) with potential behavioral health diagnoses using claims-based diagnoses. RESULTS: Enrollees with behavioral health diagnoses were less likely than enrollees without behavioral health diagnoses to be employed but significantly more likely to report improvements in health and ability to do a better job at work. In adjusted analyses, both enrollees with behavioral health diagnoses and those without behavioral health diagnoses who reported improved health were more likely than enrollees without improved health to report that Medicaid expansion coverage helped them do a better job at work and made them better able to look for a job. Among enrollees with improved health, those with a behavioral health diagnosis were as likely as those without a behavioral health diagnosis to report improved ability to work and improved job seeking after Medicaid expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage interruptions for enrollees with behavioral health diagnoses should be minimized to maintain favorable health and employment outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on health and employment outcomes among enrollees with and without a behavioral health disorder (either a mental or substance use disorder). METHODS: Between January and October 2016, the authors conducted a telephone survey of 4,090 enrollees in the Michigan Medicaid expansion program and identified 2,040 respondents (48.3%) with potential behavioral health diagnoses using claims-based diagnoses. RESULTS: Enrollees with behavioral health diagnoses were less likely than enrollees without behavioral health diagnoses to be employed but significantly more likely to report improvements in health and ability to do a better job at work. In adjusted analyses, both enrollees with behavioral health diagnoses and those without behavioral health diagnoses who reported improved health were more likely than enrollees without improved health to report that Medicaid expansion coverage helped them do a better job at work and made them better able to look for a job. Among enrollees with improved health, those with a behavioral health diagnosis were as likely as those without a behavioral health diagnosis to report improved ability to work and improved job seeking after Medicaid expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Coverage interruptions for enrollees with behavioral health diagnoses should be minimized to maintain favorable health and employment outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health care reform; Medicaid; Mental health services; Public policy issues; Work performance
Authors: Seungyoung Hwang; Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Jarcy Zee; Kara Zivin; Hillary R Bogner; Patrick J Raue; Martha L Bruce; Charles F Reynolds; Joseph J Gallo Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Robert Dunigan; Andrea Acevedo; Kevin Campbell; Deborah W Garnick; Constance M Horgan; Alice Huber; Margaret T Lee; Lee Panas; Grant A Ritter Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: David A Adler; Thomas J McLaughlin; William H Rogers; Hong Chang; Leueen Lapitsky; Debra Lerner Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Minal R Patel; Renuka Tipirneni; Edith C Kieffer; Jeffrey T Kullgren; John Z Ayanian; Tammy Chang; Erica Solway; Erin Beathard; Matthias Kirch; Sunghee Lee; Sarah Clark; Jennifer Skillicorn; Zachary Rowe; Susan D Goold Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Renuka Tipirneni; Edith C Kieffer; John Z Ayanian; Minal R Patel; Matthias A Kirch; Jamie E Luster; Monita Karmakar; Susan D Goold Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 2.655