Literature DB >> 31550606

Assessment of spatial variability of multiple ecosystem services in grasslands of different intensities.

Solen Le Clec'h1, Robert Finger2, Nina Buchmann3, Arjan S Gosal4, Lukas Hörtnagl3, Olivier Huguenin-Elie5, Philippe Jeanneret6, Andreas Lüscher5, Manuel K Schneider5, Robert Huber2.   

Abstract

Grasslands provide multiple Ecosystem Services (ES) such as forage provision, carbon sequestration or habitat provision. Knowledge about the trade-offs between these ES is of great importance for grassland management. Yet, the outcome of different management strategies on ES provision is highly uncertain due to spatial variability. We aim to characterize the provision (level and spatial variability) of grassland ES under various management strategies. To do so, we combine empirical data for multiple ES with spatially explicit census data on land use intensities. We analyzed the variations of five ES (forage provision, climate regulation, pollination, biodiversity conservation and outdoor recreation) using data from biodiversity fieldwork, experimental plots for carbon as well as social network data from Flickr. These data were used to calculate the distribution of modelled individual and multiple ES values from different grassland management types in a Swiss case study region using spatial explicit information for 17,383 grassland parcels. Our results show that (1) management regime and intensity levels play an important role in ES provision but their impact depends on the ES. In general, extensive management, especially in pastures, favors all ES but forage provision, whereas intensive management favors only forage provision and outdoor recreation; (2) ES potential provision varies between parcels under the same management due to the influence of environmental drivers, related to topography and landscape structure; (3) there is a trade-offs between forage provision and other ES at the cantonal level but a synergy between forage provision and biodiversity conservation within the grassland categories, due to the negative impact of elevation on both ES. Information about multiple ES provision is key to support effective agri-environmental measures and information about the spatial variability can prevent uncertain outputs of decision-making processes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ES provision; Land use; Management strategies; Modelling; Switzerland; Trade-offs

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31550606     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  The effects of first defoliation and previous management intensity on forage quality of a semi-natural species-rich grassland.

Authors:  Klára Pavlů; Teowdroes Kassahun; Vilém V Pavlů; Lenka Pavlů; Petr Blažek; Petr Homolka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Small-scale agricultural grassland management can affect soil fungal community structure as much as continental scale geographic patterns.

Authors:  A Fox; F Widmer; A Barreiro; M Jongen; M Musyoki; Â Vieira; J Zimmermann; C Cruz; L-M Dimitrova-Mårtensson; F Rasche; L Silva; A Lüscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Economic value of three grassland ecosystem services when managed at the regional and farm scale.

Authors:  Robert Huber; Solen Le'Clec'h; Nina Buchmann; Robert Finger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Smaller farm size and ruminant animals are associated with increased supply of non-provisioning ecosystem services.

Authors:  Johan O Karlsson; Pernilla Tidåker; Elin Röös
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 6.943

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.