Ariel Fuhrmann1, Ron Batash1, Ran Schwarzkopf1, David Backstein1. 1. From the Division of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ont. (Fuhrmann, Backstein); the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Barzilai Medical Centre, Ashkelon, Israel (Fuhrmann, Batash); and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, N.Y. (Schwarzkopf).
Abstract
Background: In Canada, health care is covered by provincial health insurance programs; patients do not directly participate in paying for their acute care expenses. The aim of this study is to assess the willingness of Canadian patients to contribute to the costs of novel total joint arthroplasty implants. Methods: We administered a questionnaire to patients attending an outpatient arthroplasty clinic in Ontario. In the questionnaire, the longevity and risk of complications of a “standard” implant were described. We asked if participants would be willing to contribute to the cost of 3 novel implants that had differing longevities and risks of complications compared with the standard implant. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients completed our questionnaire. Up to 62% of patients were willing to contribute a copayment to get an implant with greater longevity. Willingness to pay decreased to 40% for an implant with greater longevity but an increased risk of complications. Forty percent of participants were willing to pay for an implant with the same longevity as the standard implant but a decreased risk of complications. Participants with a higher income were more willing than other participants to contribute to the cost of a novel implant with greater longevity or lower complication rates. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that up to 62% of our sample of patients in Ontario were willing to share the costs of a novel total joint replacement implant. Willingness to pay was associated with the proposed benefits of the implant and certain patient characteristics. Our study shows that a high proportion of Canadian patients may be willing to copay to have access to new technologies.
Background: In Canada, health care is covered by provincial health insurance programs; patients do not directly participate in paying for their acute care expenses. The aim of this study is to assess the willingness of Canadian patients to contribute to the costs of novel total joint arthroplasty implants. Methods: We administered a questionnaire to patients attending an outpatient arthroplasty clinic in Ontario. In the questionnaire, the longevity and risk of complications of a “standard” implant were described. We asked if participants would be willing to contribute to the cost of 3 novel implants that had differing longevities and risks of complications compared with the standard implant. Results: One hundred and fifteen patients completed our questionnaire. Up to 62% of patients were willing to contribute a copayment to get an implant with greater longevity. Willingness to pay decreased to 40% for an implant with greater longevity but an increased risk of complications. Forty percent of participants were willing to pay for an implant with the same longevity as the standard implant but a decreased risk of complications. Participants with a higher income were more willing than other participants to contribute to the cost of a novel implant with greater longevity or lower complication rates. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that up to 62% of our sample of patients in Ontario were willing to share the costs of a novel total joint replacement implant. Willingness to pay was associated with the proposed benefits of the implant and certain patient characteristics. Our study shows that a high proportion of Canadian patients may be willing to copay to have access to new technologies.
Authors: Spencer S Liu; Alejandro González Della Valle; Melanie C Besculides; Licia K Gaber; Stavros G Memtsoudis Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Ran Schwarzkopf; Fabio M Sagebin; Raj Karia; Karl M Koenig; Joseph A Bosco; James D Slover Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Kevin J Bozic; Amanda R Smith; Sanaz Hariri; Sanjo Adeoye; John Gourville; William J Maloney; Brian Parsley; Harry E Rubash Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Bheeshma Ravi; Ruth Croxford; William M Reichmann; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz; Gillian A Hawker Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.098
Authors: Ran Schwarzkopf; Jeffrey N Katz; Stephanie P Chen; Yan Dong; Laurel A Donnell-Fink; Elena Losina Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-05-24 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Nathan N O'Hara; Gerard P Slobogean; Tima Mohammadi; Carlo A Marra; Milena R Vicente; Amir Khakban; Michael D McKee Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Elena Losina; Rochelle P Walensky; Courtenay L Kessler; Parastu S Emrani; William M Reichmann; Elizabeth A Wright; Holly L Holt; Daniel H Solomon; Edward Yelin; A David Paltiel; Jeffrey N Katz Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-06-22
Authors: Stephen Yu; Kevin L Garvin; William L Healy; Vincent D Pellegrini; Richard Iorio Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.020