Literature DB >> 31550037

Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Jillian T Henderson1, Elizabeth M Webber1, Sarah I Bean1.   

Abstract

Importance: Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria can identify patients for whom treatment might be beneficial for preventing symptomatic infection and other health outcomes. Objective: To systematically review benefits and harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria screening and treatment in adults, including during pregnancy, to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed (publisher-supplied records), and Cochrane Collaboration Central Registry of Controlled Trials; surveillance through May 24, 2019. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies on benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria; RCTs on benefits and harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment. Eligible populations included unselected, asymptomatic individuals without known urinary tract conditions. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent critical appraisal and data abstraction by 2 reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate benefits of the interventions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptomatic infection; function, morbidity, mortality; pregnancy complications and birth outcomes.
Results: Nineteen studies (N = 8443) meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Two cohort studies (n = 5289) found fewer cases of pyelonephritis in the cohorts of screened pregnant women (0.5%) than within retrospective comparisons of unscreened cohorts (2.2% and 1.8%); the larger study estimated a statistically significant relative risk of 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15-0.60). No studies examined screening in nonpregnant populations. Among 12 trials of asymptomatic bacteriuria screening and treatment during pregnancy (n = 2377; 1 conducted within past 30 years), there were reduced rates of pyelonephritis (range, 0%-16.5% for the intervention group and 2.2%-36.4% for the control group; pooled risk ratio [RR], 0.24 [95% CI, 0.14-0.40]; 12 trials) and low birth weight (range, 2.5%-14.8% for the intervention group and 6.7%-21.4% for the control group; pooled RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]; 7 trials). There was no significant difference in infant mortality (pooled RR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.29-3.26]; 6 trials). Five RCTs of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment in nonpregnant adults (n = 777) did not report any significant differences in risk of infection, mobility, or mortality. Limited evidence on harms of screening or treatment was available, and no statistically significant differences were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: Screening and treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy was associated with reduced rates of pyelonephritis and low birth weights, but the available evidence was not current, with only 1 study conducted in the past 30 years. Benefits of asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment in nonpregnant adult populations were not found. Trial evidence on harms of asymptomatic bacteriuria antibiotic treatment was limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31550037     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.10060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  6 in total

1.  The Role of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: Current Concepts and Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  Payam Behzadi; Edit Urbán; Mária Matuz; Ria Benkő; Márió Gajdács
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Targeting Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Antimicrobial Stewardship: the Role of the Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Zanthia Wiley; Jesse T Jacob; Eileen M Burd
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  An empirical evaluation of the impact scenario of pooling bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research.

Authors:  Nils Bröckelmann; Julia Stadelmaier; Louisa Harms; Charlotte Kubiak; Jessica Beyerbach; Martin Wolkewitz; Jörg J Meerpohl; Lukas Schwingshackl
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-10-24       Impact factor: 11.150

4.  Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Nils Bröckelmann; Sara Balduzzi; Louisa Harms; Jessica Beyerbach; Maria Petropoulou; Charlotte Kubiak; Martin Wolkewitz; Joerg J Meerpohl; Lukas Schwingshackl
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 11.150

5.  Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Vinh Q Dang; Yen Tn He; Ha Nh Pham; Tuyen Tt Trieu; Trung Q Bui; Nhu T Vuong; Loc Mt Nguyen; Diem Tn Nguyen; Thanh V Le; Wentao Li; Cam H Le; Ben W Mol; Lan N Vuong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: For How Long Will We Keep Swimming Against The Current?

Authors:  Sergio Alejandro Gómez-Ochoa
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.