Literature DB >> 31549857

kVp, mA, and voxel size effect on 3D voxel-based superimposition.

Manhal Eliliwi, Mohamed Bazina, Juan Martin Palomo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of changing kVp, mA, and voxel size on the accuracy of voxel-based superimposition on the anterior cranial base.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken on a phantom skull using different kVp, mA, and voxel size combinations. CBCT scans were superimposed using commercially available software. Two separate open-source software programs were used to generate a three-dimensional (3D) color map objective assessment of the differences in seven different regions: Nasion, Point A, Zygomatic (right and left), Point B, and Gonial (right and left). Each region had around 200 points that were used to calculate the mean differences between the superimpositions.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation showed excellent reliability (0.95). Lowering the kVp made the biggest difference, showing an average discrepancy of 0.7 ± 0.3 mm, and a high mean of 1.4 ± 0.3 in the Right Gonial region. Lowering the mA showed less of a discrepancy, with an average of 0.373 ± 0.2 mm, and the highest discrepancy, also on the Right Gonial Area, of 0.7 ± 0.1 mm. The voxel size had the least impact on the accuracy of registered volumes, with mean discrepancy values of less than 0.2 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Using different CBCT settings can affect the accuracy of the voxel-based superimposition method. This is particularly the case when using low kVp values, while changes in mA or voxel sizes did not significantly interfere with the superimposition outcome.

Keywords:  CBCT; Voxel-based superimposition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549857      PMCID: PMC8051230          DOI: 10.2319/012719-52.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  26 in total

1.  A new method for superimposition of CBCT volumes.

Authors:  Jeong-Ho Choi; James Mah
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2010-05

2.  Three-dimensional maxillary and mandibular regional superimposition using cone beam computed tomography: a validation study.

Authors:  L Koerich; D Burns; A Weissheimer; J D P Claus
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics.

Authors:  C H Kau; S Richmond; J M Palomo; M G Hans
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2005-12

4.  The novel use of three-dimensional surface models to quantify and visualise the immediate changes of the mid-facial skeleton following rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  S C Ong; B S Khambay; J P McDonald; D L Cross; L M Brocklebank; X Ju
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.392

5.  Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.

Authors:  D Maret; N Telmon; O A Peters; B Lepage; J Treil; J M Inglèse; A Peyre; J L Kahn; M Sixou
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Comparison of five cone beam computed tomography systems for the detection of vertical root fractures.

Authors:  Bassam Hassan; Maria Elissavet Metska; Ahmet Rifat Ozok; Paul van der Stelt; Paul Rudolf Wesselink
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Gavin Heymann; Marie A Cornelis; Hugo J DeClerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ana Emilia F de Oliveira; Lucia Helena S Cevidanes; Ceib Phillips; Alexandre Motta; Brandon Burke; Donald Tyndall
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-08-20

10.  A pragmatic approach to determine the optimal kVp in cone beam CT: balancing contrast-to-noise ratio and radiation dose.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Silkosessak; R Jacobs; R Bogaerts; H Bosmans; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?

Authors:  Mahkameh Moshfeghi; Yaser Safi; Ingrid Różyło-Kalinowska; Shiva Gandomi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.246

2.  Effects of Exposure Parameters and Voxel Size for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on the Image Matching Accuracy with an Optical Dental Scan Image: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Hang-Nga Mai; Du-Hyeong Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.