Literature DB >> 31549522

Age differences in outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: results from the HeadSMART study.

Lisa N Richey1, Vani Rao1, Durga Roy1, Bharat R Narapareddy1, Shreya Wigh2, Kathleen T Bechtold3, Haris I Sair4, Timothy E Van Meter5, Hayley Falk6, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos1, Haijuan Yan1, Constantine G Lyketsos1, Frederick K Korley7, Matthew E Peters1.   

Abstract

This study longitudinally examined age differences across multiple outcome domains in individuals diagnosed with acute mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). A sample of 447 adults meeting VA/DoD criteria for mTBI was dichotomized by age into older (≥65 years; n = 88) and younger (<65 years; n = 359) sub-groups. All participants presented to the emergency department within 24 hours of sustaining a head injury, and outcomes were assessed at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), post-concussive symptoms (PCS) were ascertained with the Rivermead Post-Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ), and functional recovery from the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). Mixed effects logistic regression models showed that the rate of change over time in odds of functional improvement and symptom alleviation did not significantly differ between age groups (p = 0.200-0.088). Contrary to expectation, older adults showed equivalent outcome trajectories to younger persons across time. This is a compelling finding when viewed in light of the majority opinion that older adults are at risk for significantly worse outcomes. Future work is needed to identify the protective factors inherent to sub-groups of older individuals such as this.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mild traumatic brain injury; age differences; mTBI; older adults; outcomes research

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549522     DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1657076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry        ISSN: 0954-0261


  5 in total

1.  Use of Novel Concussion Protocol With Infralow Frequency Neuromodulation Demonstrates Significant Treatment Response in Patients With Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms, a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Stella B Legarda; Caroline E Lahti; Dana McDermott; Andreas Michas-Martin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 2.  Neuroimaging and advanced research techniques may lead to improved outcomes in military members suffering from traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ron B Moyron; Paul A Vallejos; Ryan N Fuller; Natasha Dean; Nathan R Wall
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Exploring Age and Sex Patterns for Rehabilitation Referrals After a Concussion: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Douglas N Martini; Jennifer Wilhelm; Lindsey Lee; Barbara H Brumbach; James Chesnutt; Paige Skorseth; Laurie A King
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for Early Prediction of Persistent Symptoms after a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Natalie Le Sage; Jean-Marc Chauny; Simon Berthelot; Patrick Archambault; Xavier Neveu; Lynne Moore; Valérie Boucher; Jérôme Frenette; Élaine De Guise; Marie-Christine Ouellet; Jacques Lee; Andrew D McRae; Eddy Lang; Marcel Émond; Éric Mercier; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Bonnie Swaine; Peter Cameron; Jeffrey J Perry
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.869

5.  Defining Acute Traumatic Encephalopathy: Methods of the "HEAD Injury Serum Markers and Multi-Modalities for Assessing Response to Trauma" (HeadSMART II) Study.

Authors:  W Frank Peacock; Damon Kuehl; Jeff Bazarian; Adam J Singer; Chad Cannon; Zubaid Rafique; James P d'Etienne; Robert Welch; Carol Clark; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.