Literature DB >> 31549475

When mother knows best: A population genetic model of transgenerational versus intragenerational plasticity.

Guillaume J Dury1, Michael J Wade1.   

Abstract

Many organisms exhibit phenotypic plasticity; producing alternate phenotypes depending on the environment. Individuals can be plastic (intragenerational or direct plasticity), wherein individuals of the same genotype produce different phenotypes in response to the environments they experience. Alternatively, an individual's phenotype may be under the control of its parents, usually the mother (transgenerational or indirect plasticity), so that mother's genotype determines the phenotype produced by a given genotype of her offspring. Under what conditions does plasticity evolve to have intragenerational as opposed to transgenerational genetic control? To explore this question, we present a population genetic model for the evolution of transgenerational and intragenerational plasticity. We hypothesize that the capacity for plasticity incurs a fitness cost, which is borne either by the individual developing the plastic phenotype or by its mother. We also hypothesize that individuals are imperfect predictors of future environments and their capacity for plasticity can lead them occasionally to make a low-fitness phenotype for a particular environment. When the cost, benefit and error parameters are equal, we show that there is no evolutionary advantage to intragenerational over transgenerational plasticity, although the rate of evolution of transgenerational plasticity is half the rate for intragenerational plasticity, as predicted by theory on indirect genetic effects. We find that transgenerational plasticity evolves when mothers are better predictors of future environments than offspring or when the fitness cost of the capacity for plasticity is more readily borne by a mother than by her developing offspring. We discuss different natural systems with either direct intragenerational plasticity or indirect transgenerational plasticity and find a pattern qualitatively in accord with the predictions of our model.
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost of plasticity; environmental cues; indirect genetic effects; maternal effects; phenotypic plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549475     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  5 in total

1.  Effects of parental drought on offspring fitness vary among populations of a crop wild relative.

Authors:  Silvia Matesanz; Marina Ramos-Muñoz; María Luisa Rubio Teso; José María Iriondo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Niche construction in quantitative traits: heritability and response to selection.

Authors:  Laurel Fogarty; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Maternal-Offspring Interactions: Reciprocally Coevolving Social Environments.

Authors:  Michael J Wade
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  When is Offspring Viability Fitness a Measure of Paternal Fitness and When is it not?

Authors:  Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Michael J Wade
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  Avoiding extinction under nonlinear environmental change: models of evolutionary rescue with plasticity.

Authors:  Philip B Greenspoon; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.703

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.