Literature DB >> 31549432

Efficacy and Tolerance of Blended Diets in Children Receiving Gastrostomy Feeds.

Irini D Batsis1, Laura Davis2, Laura Prichett3, Linxuan Wu3, Darla Shores1, Karla Au Yeung4, Maria Oliva-Hemker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in children receiving a blended diet via a gastrostomy tube.
METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study of children ages 1-18 years that received a blended diet. We reviewed demographics, anthropometrics, clinical characteristics, and rationale for switching to blended diet. Fixed-effects logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the changes in patient symptoms over the 12-month follow-up period, and fixed-effects regression was employed to test for changes in anthropometrics.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (8 female, 15 male) were identified, and data from 89 outpatient visits were analyzed. The most common underlying diagnosis was neurological disorder. Thirty-five percent of patients received commercial whole cow milk formulas, 30% received hydrolysate formulas, and 35% received amino acid-based formulas. After formula switches were made, 65% received homemade blended diets, 17.5% received commercial blended diets, and 17.5% received a combination of both. Median duration of time on a blended diet was 17 months. Ninety-five percent of patients who were previously experiencing upper GI symptoms improved within the first 3 months after blended diet initiation. Twenty-one percent of patients developed mild constipation on the diet, which was managed with increased water intake and/or polyethylene glycol. Only 2 patients discontinued the blended diet, because of inadequate weight gain and worsening of upper GI symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, blended diets were well tolerated in gastrostomy-fed children and were associated with clinical improvement of upper GI symptoms.
© 2019 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blended diet; blenderized diet; commercial formulas; emesis; gagging; gastrostomy feedings; reflux; retching

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549432     DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract        ISSN: 0884-5336            Impact factor:   3.080


  7 in total

1.  Blenderized food tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Amy Y Spurlock; Teresa W Johnson; Ali Pritchett; Leah Pierce; Jenna Hussey; Kelly Johnson; Holly Carter; Stephen L Davidson; Manpreet S Mundi; Lisa Epp; Ryan T Hurt
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.204

2.  Effect of Added Free Water to Enteral Tube Feeds in Children Receiving Commercial Blends.

Authors:  Suzanna Hirsch; Toni Solari; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 3.  Blenderized tube feeding for children: an integrative review.

Authors:  Érica Patrícia Cunha Rosa Schmitz; Eliziane Costa da Silva; Ozeas de Lima Lins Filho; Margarida Maria de Castro Antunes; Kátia Galeão Brandt
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2021-09-01

4.  Outcomes of Blenderized Gastrostomy Feeding in Children at Rouen University Hospital.

Authors:  Faisal Alabbas; Clémentine Dumant
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2022-08-10

5.  Blenderised Tube Feeds vs. Commercial Formula: Which Is Better for Gastrostomy-Fed Children?

Authors:  Neha Chandrasekar; Kate Dehlsen; Steven T Leach; Usha Krishnan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  Monitor gastrointestinal tolerance in children who have switched to an "enteral formula with food-derived ingredients": A national, multicenter retrospective chart review (RICIMIX study).

Authors:  Graeme O'Connor; Marie Watson; Martha Van Der Linde; Rita Shergill Bonner; Julia Hopkins; Sharan Saduera
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.204

Review 7.  Nutrition and preparation of blenderized tube feeding in children and adolescents with neurological impairment: A scoping review.

Authors:  Ghita Brekke; Anne Mette Terp Raun; Sarah B Sørensen; Karin Kok; Jette L Sørensen; Alfred P Born; Christian Mølgaard; Christina E Hoei-Hansen
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.204

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.