Literature DB >> 31549361

Validation of the Sexual Experience Survey-Short Form Revised Using Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Women's Narratives of Sexual Violence.

Sasha N Canan1, Kristen N Jozkowski2,3, Jacquelyn Wiersma-Mosley4, Heather Blunt-Vinti5, Mindy Bradley6.   

Abstract

Lesbian and bisexual women have high rates of sexual violence compared to heterosexual women, yet prevalence rates vary widely across studies. The Sexual Experience Survey-Short Form Revised (SES-SFV) is the most commonly used method of measuring sexual assault and rape prevalence, but it has not been validated in this high-risk population of lesbian and bisexual women. The current study assessed a modified form of the SES-SFV utilizing a five-step, mixed-methods approach. Women (N = 1382) who identified as lesbian (31%), bisexual (32%), and heterosexual (31%) completed an online survey disseminated through Qualtrics Online Survey Company to a national audience. All types of non-consensual behaviors (non-penetrative, oral, vaginal, and anal) and nearly all perpetration tactics in the original SES-SFV emerged inductively in our qualitative data. Using quantitative data, lesbian and bisexual victims endorsed each perpetration tactic in the SES-SFV at comparable rates to heterosexual victims. SES-SFV's false-positive categorization was minimal. However, the original SES-SFV did not capture some common experiences that participants described in their open-ended narratives. The SES-SFV satisfactorily assesses sexual assault and rape experiences in lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual women. Possible additions and deletions to the SES-SFV are presented alongside discussion of managing comprehensiveness and participant fatigue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisexual; Lesbian; Rape; Sexual assault; Sexual orientation; Sexual violence

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549361     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-019-01543-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  4 in total

1.  Prepartying and incapacitated rape: Is drinking a risk factor or an outcome?

Authors:  Anna E Jaffe; Jessica A Blayney; Scott Graupensperger; Rachel Cooper; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Among Canadian University Students: Incidence, Context, and Perpetrators' Perceptions.

Authors:  Nicole K Jeffrey; Paula C Barata
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-24

3.  Development, validation, and pilot implementation of the minimum datasheet for a domestic violence registry system: The case of a developing country.

Authors:  Shabnam Iezadi; Kamal Gholipour; Ahmad Khanijahani; Mahasti Alizadeh; Bahram Samadirad; Hanie Azizi; Farzad Azizinia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Sexual violence in older adults: a Belgian prevalence study.

Authors:  Adina Cismaru-Inescu; Christophe Vandeviver; Anne Nobels; Laurent Nisen; Bastien Hahaut; Marie Beaulieu; Gilbert Lemmens; Stéphane Adam; Evelyn Schapansky; Ines Keygnaert
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.921

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.