Literature DB >> 31549309

Monitoring online biomass with a capacitance sensor during scale-up of industrially relevant CHO cell culture fed-batch processes in single-use bioreactors.

S Metze1,2, S Ruhl1, G Greller1, C Grimm1, J Scholz3.   

Abstract

In 2004, the FDA published a guideline to implement process analytical technologies (PAT) in biopharmaceutical processes for process monitoring to gain process understanding and for the control of important process parameters. Viable cell concentration (VCC) is one of the most important key performance indicator (KPI) during mammalian cell cultivation processes. Commonly, this is measured offline. In this work, we demonstrated the comparability and scalability of linear regression models derived from online capacitance measurements. The linear regressions were used to predict the VCC and other familiar offline biomass indicators, like the viable cell volume (VCV) and the wet cell weight (WCW), in two different industrially relevant CHO cell culture processes (Process A and Process B). Therefore, different single-use bioreactor scales (50-2000 L) were used to prove feasibility and scalability of the in-line sensor integration. Coefficient of determinations of 0.79 for Process A and 0.99 for Process B for the WCW were achieved. The VCV was described with high coefficients of determination of 0.96 (Process A) and 0.98 (Process B), respectively. In agreement with other work from the literature, the VCC was only described within the exponential growth phase, but resulting in excellent coefficients of determination of 0.99 (Process A) and 0.96 (Process B), respectively. Monitoring these KPIs online using linear regression models appeared to be scale-independent, enabled deeper process understanding (e.g. here demonstrated in monitoring, the feeding profile) and showed the potential of this method for process control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacitance; Impedance; Mammalian CHO cell culture; PAT; Process monitoring and control; Scale-up

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549309     DOI: 10.1007/s00449-019-02216-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng        ISSN: 1615-7591            Impact factor:   3.210


  5 in total

1.  Implementation of QbD strategies in the inoculum expansion of a mAb production process.

Authors:  Ole Jacob Böhl; Jana Schellenberg; Janina Bahnemann; Bernd Hitzmann; Thomas Scheper; Dörte Solle
Journal:  Eng Life Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.678

2.  N-1 Perfusion Platform Development Using a Capacitance Probe for Biomanufacturing.

Authors:  Emily S C Rittershaus; Matthew S Rehmann; Jianlin Xu; Qin He; Charles Hill; Jeffrey Swanberg; Michael C Borys; Zheng-Jian Li; Anurag Khetan
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  Development of process analytical tools for rapid monitoring of live virus vaccines in manufacturing.

Authors:  Sijia Yi; Reilly McCracken; Joseph Davide; Daniel Ryan Salovich; Travis Whitmer; Aditya Bhat; Josef Vlasak; Sha Ha; Darrell Sehlin; Joseph Califano; Kristin Ploeger; Malini Mukherjee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  High density bioprocessing of human pluripotent stem cells by metabolic control and in silico modeling.

Authors:  Felix Manstein; Kevin Ullmann; Christina Kropp; Caroline Halloin; Wiebke Triebert; Annika Franke; Clara-Milena Farr; Anais Sahabian; Alexandra Haase; Yannik Breitkreuz; Michael Peitz; Oliver Brüstle; Stefan Kalies; Ulrich Martin; Ruth Olmer; Robert Zweigerdt
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  Cultivating Multidisciplinarity: Manufacturing and Sensing Challenges in Cultured Meat Production.

Authors:  Mila Djisalov; Teodora Knežić; Ivana Podunavac; Kristina Živojević; Vasa Radonic; Nikola Ž Knežević; Ivan Bobrinetskiy; Ivana Gadjanski
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.