Andy Wang1, Takefumi Komiya2. 1. Indiana University School of Medicine, Fort Wayne, IN, USA. 2. Parkview Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, 11050 Parkview Circle, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845, USA. takefumi.komiya@parkview.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research submitted recommendations to the FDA to reduce barriers in clinical trial participation. They proposed the removal of several specific exclusion criteria, including brain metastasis. Clinical trials involving small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have varying exclusion criteria regarding brain metastasis. METHODS: We completed an online search of clinicaltrials.gov for the query "SCLC, extensive stage." The trials were classified into a group of strict exclusion, allowed only if treated, allowed without treatment, or undefined. Relationships between status of brain metastasis in exclusion criteria and study characteristics (trial status, trial design, sponsor, location, and treatment groups) were investigated by Chi-squared test. The trends of exclusion status were investigated by a comparison against the variable time. RESULTS: Of the 204 eligible trials, 32 strictly excluded any form or history of CNS metastases, 129 allowed patients that are undergoing or have undergone CNS-specific therapy, 9 allowed patients without any CNS-specific therapy, and 34 did not mention any criteria involving CNS metastases. Studies conducted outside the United States and with single systemic therapy were associated with strict exclusion of brain metastasis (p = 0.026 and 0.039, respectively). The proportion of clinical trials with strict exclusion has remained around 15% for the past few decades. CONCLUSION: Non-US and single systemic therapy studies are more commonly associated with strict exclusion of brain metastasis in ES-SCLC trials. The strict exclusion of brain metastases in clinical trials has remained relatively constant for the past few decades.
BACKGROUND: The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research submitted recommendations to the FDA to reduce barriers in clinical trial participation. They proposed the removal of several specific exclusion criteria, including brain metastasis. Clinical trials involving small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have varying exclusion criteria regarding brain metastasis. METHODS: We completed an online search of clinicaltrials.gov for the query "SCLC, extensive stage." The trials were classified into a group of strict exclusion, allowed only if treated, allowed without treatment, or undefined. Relationships between status of brain metastasis in exclusion criteria and study characteristics (trial status, trial design, sponsor, location, and treatment groups) were investigated by Chi-squared test. The trends of exclusion status were investigated by a comparison against the variable time. RESULTS: Of the 204 eligible trials, 32 strictly excluded any form or history of CNS metastases, 129 allowed patients that are undergoing or have undergone CNS-specific therapy, 9 allowed patients without any CNS-specific therapy, and 34 did not mention any criteria involving CNS metastases. Studies conducted outside the United States and with single systemic therapy were associated with strict exclusion of brain metastasis (p = 0.026 and 0.039, respectively). The proportion of clinical trials with strict exclusion has remained around 15% for the past few decades. CONCLUSION: Non-US and single systemic therapy studies are more commonly associated with strict exclusion of brain metastasis in ES-SCLC trials. The strict exclusion of brain metastases in clinical trials has remained relatively constant for the past few decades.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brain metastasis; Clinical trials; Exclusion criteria; Small cell lung cancer
Authors: Nancy U Lin; Eudocia Q Lee; Hidefumi Aoyama; Igor J Barani; Brigitta G Baumert; Paul D Brown; D Ross Camidge; Susan M Chang; Janet Dancey; Laurie E Gaspar; Gordon J Harris; F Stephen Hodi; Steven N Kalkanis; Kathleen R Lamborn; Mark E Linskey; David R Macdonald; Kim Margolin; Minesh P Mehta; David Schiff; Riccardo Soffietti; John H Suh; Martin J van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; Jeffrey S Wefel; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Solange Peters; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Shirish Gadgeel; Jin S Ahn; Dong-Wan Kim; Sai-Hong I Ou; Maurice Pérol; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Rafael Rosell; Ali Zeaiter; Emmanuel Mitry; Sophie Golding; Bogdana Balas; Johannes Noe; Peter N Morcos; Tony Mok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nancy U Lin; Tatiana Prowell; Antoinette R Tan; Marina Kozak; Oliver Rosen; Laleh Amiri-Kordestani; Julia White; Joohee Sul; Louise Perkins; Katherine Beal; Richard Gaynor; Edward S Kim Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stuart M Lichtman; R Donald Harvey; Marie-Anne Damiette Smit; Atiqur Rahman; Michael A Thompson; Nancy Roach; Caroline Schenkel; Suanna S Bruinooge; Patricia Cortazar; Dana Walker; Louis Fehrenbacher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edward S Kim; Suanna S Bruinooge; Samantha Roberts; Gwynn Ison; Nancy U Lin; Lia Gore; Thomas S Uldrick; Stuart M Lichtman; Nancy Roach; Julia A Beaver; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Paul J Hesketh; Andrea M Denicoff; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Eric Rubin; Pratik Multani; Tatiana M Prowell; Caroline Schenkel; Marina Kozak; Jeff Allen; Ellen Sigal; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 44.544