Literature DB >> 31549190

Application of Percutaneous Osteoplasty in Treating Pelvic Bone Metastases: Efficacy and Safety.

He-Fei Liu1, Chun-Gen Wu2, Qing-Hua Tian1, Tao Wang1, Fei Yi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous vertebroplasty has been a good option to treat vertebral metastases. The pelvic bone is a common site of spread for many cancers. Using follow-up data for 126 patients, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous osteoplasty (POP) to treat pelvic bone metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 126 patients (mean age 57.45 ± 11.46 years old) with 178 lesions were treated using POP. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the changes in the patient's use of painkillers were used to evaluate pain and quality of life before the procedure, and at 3 days and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients. The mean VAS scores decreased significantly from 6.87 ± 1.33 before the procedure to 3.33 ± 1.94 by day 3 after the procedure (P < 0.05), 2.26 ± 1.59 at 1 month (P < 0.05), 1.89 ± 1.53 at 3 months (P < 0.05), 1.87 ± 1.46 at 6 months (P < 0.05), 1.90 ± 1.47 at 9 months (P < 0.05), and 1.49 ± 1.17 at 12 months (P < 0.05). The ODI also changed after the procedure, with significant differences between baseline scores and at each follow-up examination (P < 0.05). Pain relief was achieved in 118 patients (93.65%); however, pain relief was not obvious in seven patients (5.56%), and pain was aggravated in one patient (0.79%). Extraosseous cement leakage occurred in 35 patients (27.78%) without causing any clinical complications.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous osteoplasty is a safe and effective choice for patients with painful osteolytic pelvic bone metastases. It can relieve pain, reduce disability, and improve function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b, retrospective study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interventional therapy; POP; Pelvic bone metastases; Percutaneous osteoplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549190     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02320-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

Review 1.  Minimally Invasive Interventional Procedures for Metastatic Bone Disease: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Papalexis; Anna Parmeggiani; Giuliano Peta; Paolo Spinnato; Marco Miceli; Giancarlo Facchini
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 2.  Interventional Radiology in the Management of Metastases and Bone Tumors.

Authors:  Ferruccio Sgalambro; Luigi Zugaro; Federico Bruno; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Nicola Salducca; Carmine Zoccali; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Francesco Arrigoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Percutaneous-Reinforced Osteoplasty: A Review of Emerging Treatment Strategies for Bone Interventions.

Authors:  Nischal Koirala; Jyotsna Joshi; Stephen F Duffy; Gordon McLennan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.