Literature DB >> 31548916

LY86, LRG1 and PDE9A genes overexpression in umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem progenitor cells by acute myeloid leukemia (M3) microvesicles.

Farnaz Razmkhah1,2, Sorayya Ghasemi3, Masoud Soleimani4, Sedigheh Amini Kafi-Abad5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microvesicles as a new device of cell-cell communication are potentially able to induce some phenotypes and genotypes of an origin cell in a target cell. We evaluate the role of leukemia microvesicles on the leukemia stem cells (LSCs)-specific genes expression in healthy hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs).
METHODS: HL-60 and NB-4 cell lines were selected for microvesicles isolation by ultracentrifugation. Healthy HSPCs were obtained by magnetic association cell sorting (MACS) and CD-34 micro-beads from umbilical cord blood samples and then, were treated with 20 and 40 μg/ml leukemia microvesicles for 10 days, respectively. LY86, LRG1 and PDE9A genes expression as LSC specific genes were analyzed by QRT-PCR. Surface CD-34 antigen as stemness marker was measured by flow cytometry technique.
RESULTS: Healthy HSPCs showed a significant increase in LSC specific genes expression after treatment with both 20 and 40 μg/ml leukemia microvesicles at day 10. All studied groups showed more than 70% surface CD-34 antigen at the last day of experiment which proved HSPCs stemness.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that healthy HSPCs can be transformed genetically by leukemia microvesicles to over express LSC specific genes. This may be further evidence of leukemia-like transformation by leukemia microvesicles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell communication; Hematopoietic stem progenitor cells; Leukemia; Microvesicles

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548916      PMCID: PMC6751795          DOI: 10.1186/s40164-019-0147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 2162-3619


To the respectful editor, Microvesicles, as units of biological information, play a remarkable role in cell–cell interactions [1]. Numerous studies have shown that microvesicles are able to phenotypically transform a target cell (normal or tumor cell) to express some proteins [2], mRNAs [3] and microRNAs [4] of origin cell. For example, genomic instability as one of the first events in cancer, can be induced in normal transplant by leukemia microvesicles [5, 6]. It seems that microvesicles are passing a crucial step to be known as the first factors in cancer initiation, progression and invasion. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is created from genomic alterations in a healthy hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) which is now called leukemia stem cell (LSC). This new cell keeps the ability of self-renewal but is affected by cell death, proliferation and differentiation [7]. In the leukemia microenvironment, leukemia and healthy cells, are in regular cell–cell communication through microvesicles. This study tries to determine whether leukemia microvesicles are able to affect healthy HSPCs and dysregulate some genes such as LY86, LRG1 and PDE9A as LSC specific genes which have fully different patterns of expression in HSC and LSC [8]. Isolated leukemia microvesicles from HL-60 and NB-4 cell lines were assessed by DLS technique (Additional file 1) and showed that all microvesicles are less than 1 μm in diameter which is the maximum limit of size for microvesicles (Additional file 2). Then healthy HSPCs from umbilical cord blood samples were treated with 20 and 40 μg/ml leukemia microvesicles for 10 days. CD-34 positive cells (98%) at day 0, still showed a high level of CD-34 antigen (more than 70%) as stemness marker after 10-day treatment with leukemia microvesicles (Additional file 3). Quantitative Real Time PCR (Table 1) was performed at day 10 of experiment to evaluate any fold change of three selected genes expression in healthy HSPCs. LY86 gene expression significantly increased (P < 0.001) with both doses of leukemia microvesicles (20 and 40 μg/ml) in both studied groups (treatment with NB-4 and HL-60 microvesicles) as shown in Fig. 1a. LY86 gene overexpression in HSPCs treated with NB-4 microvesicles was more remarkable than in HSPCs treated with HL-60 microvesicles. This change is also dose dependent which is more distinct in HSPCs treated with 40 μg/ml than 20 μg/ml microvesicles.
Table 1

Primer sequences

Gene namePrimer typePrimer sequence
LY86 Forward5-GAA GGA AAG GAG AGC AGA TTT AC-3
LY86 Reverse5-TGA TAG TAG CAT TGG CAC AGG-3
LRG1 Forward5-TCT TGG AGC AGA CAG CGA C-3
LRG1 Reverse5-TTT CGG CAG GTG GTT GAC AG-3
PDE9A Forward5-ATA ACC ACA AGA AGT TGA CTC CTC-3
PDE9A Reverse5-GCA GCT CAG CAT CTC ATT GG-3
HPRT1 Forward5-CCT GGC GTC GTG ATT AGT G-3
HPRT1 Reverse5-TCA GTC CTG TCC ATA ATT AGT CC-3
Fig. 1

LY86, LRG1 and PDE9A genes expression in studied groups treated with HL-60 microvesicles (H20: 20 μg/ml microvesicles, H40: 40 μg/ml microvesicles) and NB-4 microvesicles (N20: 20 μg/ml microvesicles, N40: 40 μg/ml microvesicles). a LY86 gene fold change, b LRG1 gene fold change and c PDE9A gene fold change in different groups of HSPCs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001

Primer sequences LY86, LRG1 and PDE9A genes expression in studied groups treated with HL-60 microvesicles (H20: 20 μg/ml microvesicles, H40: 40 μg/ml microvesicles) and NB-4 microvesicles (N20: 20 μg/ml microvesicles, N40: 40 μg/ml microvesicles). a LY86 gene fold change, b LRG1 gene fold change and c PDE9A gene fold change in different groups of HSPCs. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001 The fold change of LRG1 gene expression in HSPCs was extremely high in both studied groups (P < 0.001). This increase was also dose dependent which was more in HSPCs treated with 40 μg/ml than 20 μg/ml leukemia microvesicles (Fig. 1b). PDE9A gene expression, however, did not change remarkably in HSPCs treated with HL-60 microvesicles, increased significantly at the last day of experiment (day 10) in a dose dependent manner (P < 0.05). This increase was more observable in HSPCs treated with NB-4 microvesicles (Fig. 1c) without a dose dependent manner (P < 0.001). It seems that microvesicles are powerful enough to affect the pattern of gene expression in a target cell since Cardiomyocytes derived microvesicles/exosomes dysregulated 333 genes in fibroblast including 175 up regulations and 158 down regulations [9]. We previously showed the effect of leukemia microvesicles on survival and transformation of umbilical cord blood HSPCs [10-12]. Another study revealed that LSCs microvesicles are able to induce proliferation and migration of myeloid leukemia cells and support malignant cells [13]. In harmony with the above mentioned results, our study showed the ability of leukemia microvesicles in transformation of healthy HSPCs to over express LSC specific genes. While leukemia microvesicles are able to transform a healthy HSPC through dysregulation of genes, mRNAs, microRNAs and proteins, there is always a question: will this transformation cause leukemia? This question is much more crucial when we know there is a close communication between leukemia and healthy cells in the bone marrow microenvironment through microvesicles. Therefore, any leukemia-like transformation of healthy HSPCs may be a step toward the leukemia, which may result in leukemia progression and relapse. Additional file 1. Materials and methods. Additional file 2. DLS technique. Isolated microvesicles were quantitatively size proved (80–1000 nm). Additional file 3. CD34 analysis at the end day of experiment. All studied groups expressed more than 70% stemness marker.
  13 in total

1.  Identification of therapeutic targets for quiescent, chemotherapy-resistant human leukemia stem cells.

Authors:  Yoriko Saito; Hiroshi Kitamura; Atsushi Hijikata; Mariko Tomizawa-Murasawa; Satoshi Tanaka; Shinsuke Takagi; Naoyuki Uchida; Nahoko Suzuki; Akiko Sone; Yuho Najima; Hidetoshi Ozawa; Atsushi Wake; Shuichi Taniguchi; Leonard D Shultz; Osamu Ohara; Fumihiko Ishikawa
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury.

Authors:  Stefania Bruno; Cristina Grange; Maria Chiara Deregibus; Raffaele A Calogero; Silvia Saviozzi; Federica Collino; Laura Morando; Alessandro Busca; Michele Falda; Benedetta Bussolati; Ciro Tetta; Giovanni Camussi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  miR-146b-5p within BCR-ABL1-Positive Microvesicles Promotes Leukemic Transformation of Hematopoietic Cells.

Authors:  Hong-Mei Zhang; Qing Li; Xiaojian Zhu; Wei Liu; Hui Hu; Teng Liu; Fanjun Cheng; Yong You; Zhaodong Zhong; Ping Zou; Qiubai Li; Zhichao Chen; An-Yuan Guo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  BCR-ABL1-positive microvesicles transform normal hematopoietic transplants through genomic instability: implications for donor cell leukemia.

Authors:  X Zhu; Y You; Q Li; C Zeng; F Fu; A Guo; H Zhang; P Zou; Z Zhong; H Wang; Y Wu; Q Li; F Kong; Z Chen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Cooperating gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Renneville; C Roumier; V Biggio; O Nibourel; N Boissel; P Fenaux; C Preudhomme
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Microvesicles: messengers and mediators of tumor progression.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Nedawi; Brian Meehan; Janusz Rak
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Cardiomyocyte microvesicles contain DNA/RNA and convey biological messages to target cells.

Authors:  Anders Waldenström; Nina Gennebäck; Urban Hellman; Gunnar Ronquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stable cell fate changes in marrow cells induced by lung-derived microvesicles.

Authors:  Jason M Aliotta; Mandy Pereira; Ming Li; Ashley Amaral; Arina Sorokina; Mark S Dooner; Edmund H Sears; Kate Brilliant; Bharat Ramratnam; Douglas C Hixson; Peter J Quesenberry
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2012-04-16

9.  Leukemia cell microvesicles promote survival in umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Farnaz Razmkhah; Masoud Soleimani; Davood Mehrabani; Mohammad Hossein Karimi; Sedigheh Amini Kafi-Abad
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.068

10.  Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Johan Skog; Tom Würdinger; Sjoerd van Rijn; Dimphna H Meijer; Laura Gainche; Miguel Sena-Esteves; William T Curry; Bob S Carter; Anna M Krichevsky; Xandra O Breakefield
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prognostic and clinicopathological insights of phosphodiesterase 9A gene as novel biomarker in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tasmina Ferdous Susmi; Atikur Rahman; Md Moshiur Rahman Khan; Farzana Yasmin; Md Shariful Islam; Omaima Nasif; Sulaiman Ali Alharbi; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Mohammad Uzzal Hossain
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Identification of Key Gene Signatures Associated With Bone Metastasis in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using Co-Expression Analysis.

Authors:  Zhongxiang Yu; Hanlin Zou; Huihao Wang; Qi Li; Dong Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Research Progress on Leucine-Rich Alpha-2 Glycoprotein 1: A Review.

Authors:  Yonghui Zou; Yi Xu; Xiaofeng Chen; Yaoqi Wu; Longsheng Fu; Yanni Lv
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Exogenous mitochondrial transfer and endogenous mitochondrial fission facilitate AML resistance to OxPhos inhibition.

Authors:  Kaori Saito; Qi Zhang; Haeun Yang; Kotoko Yamatani; Tomohiko Ai; Vivian Ruvolo; Natalia Baran; Tianyu Cai; Helen Ma; Rodrigo Jacamo; Vinitha Kuruvilla; Junichi Imoto; Sonoko Kinjo; Kazuho Ikeo; Kaori Moriya; Koya Suzuki; Takashi Miida; Yong-Mi Kim; Christopher P Vellano; Michael Andreeff; Joseph R Marszalek; Yoko Tabe; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-10-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.