| Literature DB >> 31548590 |
Zarith Asyikin Abdul Aziz1,2, Hasmida Mohd Nasir1, Akil Ahmad2,3, Siti Hamidah Mohd Setapar4,5,6, Hafandi Ahmad7, Mohd Hezmee Mohd Noor7, Mohd Rafatullah3, Asma Khatoon2, Mohd Adnan Kausar8, Irfan Ahmad9,10, Shahida Khan11,12, Majed Al-Shaeri13, Ghulam Md Ashraf14,15.
Abstract
Eucalyptus globulus is an aromatic medicinal plant which known for its 1,8-cineole main pharmacological constituent exhibits as natural analgesic agent. Eucalyptus globulus-loaded micellar nanoparticle was developed via spontaneous emulsification technique and further evaluation for its analgesic efficacy study, in vivo analgesic activity assay in rats. The nanoemulsion system containing Eucalyptus-micelles was optimized at different surfactant types (Tween 40, 60 and 80) and concentrations (3.0, 6.0, 9.0, 12.0, 15.0, and 18.0 wt. %). These formulations were characterized by thermodynamically stability, viscosity, micelles particle size, pH, and morphology structure. The spontaneous emulsification technique offered a greener micelles formation in nanoemulsion system by slowly titrated of organic phase, containing Eucalyptus globulus (active compound), grape seed oil (carrier oil) and hydrophilic surfactant into aqueous phase, and continuously stirred for 30 min to form a homogeneity solution. The characterizations evaluation revealed an optimized formulation with Tween 40 surfactant type at 9.0 wt. % of surfactant concentration promoted the most thermodynamic stability, smaller micelles particle size (d = 17.13 ± 0.035 nm) formed with spherical shape morphological structure, and suitable in viscosity (≈2.3 cP) and pH value (6.57) for transdermal purpose. The in vivo analgesic activity assay of optimized emulsion showed that the transdermal administration of micellar nanoparticle of Eucalyptus globulus on fore and hind limb of rats, possessed the central and peripheral analgesic effects by prolonged the rats pain responses towards the heat stimulus after being put on top of hot plate (55 °C), with longest time responses, 40.75 s at 60 min after treatment administration. Thus, this study demonstrated that micellar nanoparticle of Eucalyptus globulus formed in nanoemulsion system could be promising as an efficient transdermal nanocarrier for the analgesic therapy alternative.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31548590 PMCID: PMC6757054 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50134-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) chromatograph of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil.
Chemical constituents of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil.
| Peak No. | Retention Time (min) | Molecular Formula | Compound | Relative Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.462 | C10H16 | α-Thujene | 0.01 |
| 2 | 5.617 | C10H16 | α-Pinene | 1.89 |
| 3 | 5.952 | C10H16 | Camphene | 0.01 |
| 4 | 6.406 | C10H16 | Β-Phellandrene | 0.01 |
| 5 | 6.510 | C10H16 | Β-Pinene | 0.21 |
| 6 | 6.713 | C10H16 | Β-Myrcene | 0.32 |
| 7 | 7.088 | C10H16 | α-Phellandrene | 0.60 |
| 8 | 7.311 | C10H16 | Terpinolen | 0.17 |
| 9 | 7.490 | C10H14 | Benzene | 6.16 |
| 10 | 7.577 | C10H16 | D-Limonene | 5.89 |
| 11 | 7.699 | C10H18O | 1,8-Cineole | 75.96 |
| 12 | 7.913 | C10H16 | Β-Ocimene | 0.06 |
| 13 | 8.183 | C10H16 | Gamma-Terpinene | 7.04 |
| 14 | 8.471 | C10H18O2 | 2-Furanmethanol | 0.06 |
| 15 | 8.498 | C9H10O3 | 3-Methyl-4-cyclohexene | 0.05 |
| 16 | 8.766 | C10H16 | Terpinolen | 0.43 |
| 17 | 8.810 | C10H18O2 | 2-Furanmethanol | 0.03 |
| 18 | 8.962 | C10H12 | Styrene | 0.03 |
| 19 | 9.094 | C10H18O | Β-Linalool | 0.13 |
| 20 | 9.167 | C10H20O2 | Butanoic acid | 0.07 |
| 21 | 9.515 | C10H18O | D-Fenchyl alcohol | 0.08 |
| 22 | 9.998 | C10H16O | Bicyclo[3,1,1]heptan-3-ol | 0.13 |
| 23 | 10.617 | C10H18O | α-Terpineol | 0.05 |
| 24 | 10.823 | C10H18O | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.34 |
| 25 | 11.139 | C10H18O | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.32 |
Figure 2Transparent micellar formulation of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil in nanoemulsion system; (A) Tween 40, (B) Tween 60, and (C) Tween 80 of surfactants.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of mechanism of micelles formation through nanoemulsion system using spontaneous emulsification technique.
Figure 4Effect of oil composition (wt. %) on micelles particle size (experimental conditions: 100 mL solution; 3.0 wt. % of oil composition, 3.0 wt. % of Tween 40 surfactant concentration, at 25 °C temperature and 1000 rpm stirring speed).
Figure 5Shear viscosity related to Eucalyptus essential oil composition in oil phase (experimental conditions: 100 mL solution; 3.0 wt. % of oil composition, 3.0 wt. % of Tween 40 surfactant concentration, at 25 °C temperature and 1000 rpm stirring speed).
Optical properties of micellar formulation through nanoemulsion system by Tween 40 surfactant.
| Oil Phase Composition (wt. %) | Surfactant Concentration (wt. %) | Thermodynamic Stability Phase Analysis | Optical Properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT | HCC | FT | |||
| 3.0 | 3.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 6.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 9.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 12.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 15.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 18.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
Optical properties of micellar formulation through nanoemulsion system by Tween 80 surfactant.
| Oil Phase Composition (wt. %) | Surfactant Concentration (wt. %) | Thermodynamic Stability Phase Analysis | Optical Properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT | HCC | FT | |||
| 3.0 | 3.0 | Pass | Not Pass | Not Pass | Unstable |
| 3.0 | 6.0 | Pass | Not Pass | Not Pass | Unstable |
| 3.0 | 9.0 | Pass | Not Pass | Not Pass | Unstable |
| 3.0 | 12.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 15.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 18.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
Figure 6Nanoemulsions system viscosity dependent on manipulated surfactant concentrations (experimental conditions: 100 mL solution; 3.0 wt. % of oil composition, manipulated surfactant concentrations at 25 °C temperature and 1000 rpm stirring speed).
Micelles particle size, polydispersity index and pH values of Eucalyptus essential oil-micellar nanoparticle in nanoemulsion system.
| Surfactant | Mass Fraction | Micelles Average Particle Size (nm) | Polydispersity Index | pH Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tween 40 | 1:1 | 42.85 ± 0.2759 | 0.242 ± 0.0047 | 7.20 |
| 1:2 | 19.92 ± 0.0686 | 0.222 ± 0.0038 | 6.95 | |
| 1:3 | 17.13 ± 0.035 | 0.305 ± 0.0056 | 6.57 | |
| 1:4 | 17.57 ± 0.0984 | 0.495 ± 0.0026 | 6.02 | |
| 1:5 | 13.68 ± 0.0759 | 0.377 ± 0.0026 | 5.47 | |
| 1:6 | 12.57 ± 0.0947 | 0.349 ± 0.0087 | 5.20 | |
| Tween 60 | 1:4 | 54.07 ± 0.3091 | 0.887 ± 0.0028 | 6.35 |
| 1:5 | 68.5 ± 0.2160 | 0.935 ± 0.0104 | 6.01 | |
| 1:6 | 72.97 ± 0.0406 | 0.861 ± 0.2759 | 5.75 | |
| Tween 80 | 1:4 | 24.21 ± 0.1143 | 0.796 ± 0.0014 | 6.01 |
| 1:5 | 23.51 ± 0.4852 | 0.738 ± 0.0086 | 5.42 | |
| 1:6 | 45.01 ± 21.144 | 0.548 ± 0.0786 | 5.13 |
Figure 7Morphology structure of Eucalyptus essential oil-micellar nanoparticle in nanoemulsion system.
Rats pain reaction time after topically applied with normal saline (10 mL/kg), pure Eucalyptus essential oil (500 mg/kg), and Eucalyptus essential oil-micellar nanoparticle (100 mg/kg).
| Treatments | aReaction time (s) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | |
Normal saline (10 mL/kg) | 22.5 ± 3.95 | 19.0 ± 2.95 | 24.0 ± 6.15 | 24.0 ± 3.61 | 17.3 ± 2.25 | 15.8 ± 3.02 |
Pure (500 mg/kg) | 33.5 ± 0.70 | 34.0 ± 2.25 | 29.3 ± 3.3 | 31.5 ± 2.18 | 28.8 ± 2.05 | 34.3 ± 3.05 |
| 35.0 ± 4.10 | 36.0 ± 2.45 | 34.8 ± 3.45 | 37.0 ± 3.50 | 30.3 ± 3.55 | 40.8 ± 2.7 | |
aMean of rat’s pain reaction time.
Figure 8Maximum possible analgesia (MPA) (%) representing the comparison of analgesic activity between pure Eucalyptus essential oil and Eucalyptus essential oil-micellar nanoparticle transdermal administered into rats (experimental conditions: 100 mL solution; 3.0 wt. % of oil composition, 9. 0 wt. % of Tween 40 surfactant concentration, at 25 °C temperature and 1000 rpm stirring speed).
Optical properties of micellar formulation through nanoemulsion system by Tween 60 surfactant.
| Oil Phase Composition (wt. %) | Surfactant Concentration (wt. %) | Thermodynamic Stability Phase Analysis | Optical Properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENT | HCC | FT | |||
| 3.0 | 3.0 | Not Pass | Not Pass | Not Pass | Unstable |
| 3.0 | 6.0 | Not Pass | Not Pass | Not Pass | Unstable |
| 3.0 | 9.0 | Not Pass | Not Pass | Not Pass | Unstable |
| 3.0 | 12.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 15.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |
| 3.0 | 18.0 | Pass | Pass | Pass | Stable |