Qiang Liu1, Huai Yu Wang1, Xi-Jun He2. 1. Nanchong Key Laboratory of Disease Prevention, Control and Detection in Livestock and Poultry, Nanchong Vocational and Technical College, Nanchong 637131, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China.
Abstract
Immunoproteasome (i-proteasome) has both immune and non-immune functions and plays important roles in controlling infections and combating illnesses. Our previous studies suggest that interferon (IFN)-γ induces the expression of three immune-specific catalytic subunits of the 20S proteasome that can replace their constitutive homologues to form the i-proteasome in immune cells, such as porcine alveolar macrophages (AMs) in vitro. However, i-proteasome levels and their modulation in non-immune cells such as the epithelial cells in pigs remain unknown. Here, we investigated the expression of i-proteasomes in non-immune cells (porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells) to determine i-proteasome modulation upon stimulation of PK-15 cells with IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in vitro. The expression of i-proteasome subunits in PK-15 cells were regulated by IFN-γ and TNF-α. Remarkably, we found that the combination treatment of IFN-γ and TNF-α increased the expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in PK-15 cells at transcriptional levels, but may decrease their expression at translational level, compared to their expression levels induced by individual cytokine treatments. These results provide critical insight into i-proteasome modulation in porcine non-immune cells, contribute further to our understanding of i-proteasome function in tissue pathogenesis and the development of antiviral adaptive immune responses against intracellular infections.
Immunoproteasome (i-proteasome) has both immune and non-immune functions and plays important roles in controlling infections and combating illnesses. Our previous studies suggest that interferon (IFN)-γ induces the expression of three immune-specific catalytic subunits of the 20S proteasome that can replace their constitutive homologues to form the i-proteasome in immune cells, such as porcine alveolar macrophages (AMs) in vitro. However, i-proteasome levels and their modulation in non-immune cells such as the epithelial cells in pigs remain unknown. Here, we investigated the expression of i-proteasomes in non-immune cells (porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells) to determine i-proteasome modulation upon stimulation of PK-15 cells with IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in vitro. The expression of i-proteasome subunits in PK-15 cells were regulated by IFN-γ and TNF-α. Remarkably, we found that the combination treatment of IFN-γ and TNF-α increased the expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in PK-15 cells at transcriptional levels, but may decrease their expression at translational level, compared to their expression levels induced by individual cytokine treatments. These results provide critical insight into i-proteasome modulation in porcine non-immune cells, contribute further to our understanding of i-proteasome function in tissue pathogenesis and the development of antiviral adaptive immune responses against intracellular infections.
Proteasomes are large, intracellular, multicatalytic, proteinase complexes responsible for
degrading ubiquitinated proteins in jawed vertebrates and play a critical role in homeostasis
and immunity [18]. The central proteolytic unit of this
system is the 20S proteasome, which has a barrel-shaped structure comprising four
heteroheptameric rings with seven subunits each. The two pairs of outer α rings are composed
of seven α-type structural subunits (α1-α7), whereas the two pairs of inner β rings are
composed of seven β-type structural subunits (β1-β7), three of which (namely β1, also known as
PSMB6, Y, and δ; β2, also known as PSMB7, Z, and MC14; and β5, also known as PSMB5, X, MB1,
and ε) exhibit proteolytic activity, including caspase-like activity for β1, trypsin-like
activity for β2, and chymotrypsin-like activity for β5. The two 19S regulatory complex
components located at both ends of the 20S core proteasome recognize ubiquitinated proteins
and direct them into the core of the 20S core proteasome, where they are degraded into smaller
peptides by proteolysis [12]. Cells of hematopoietic
origin and those stimulated with pro-inflammatory factors, such as interferon (IFN)-γ,
demonstrate upregulation of these three inducible “immunosubunits” including β1i (also known
as large multifunctional peptidase (LMP) 2 or proteasome subunit beta type (PSMB) 9), β2i
(also known as LMP10, multicatalytic endopeptidase complex-like (MECL)-1, or PSMB10), and β5i
(also known as LMP7 or PSMB8), which replace the three β subunits (β1, β2, and β5) of the 20S
proteasome. This proteasome with the modified β subunits is known as the immunoproteasome
(i-proteasome). Evidence suggests that peptides generated by the i-proteasome are both
distinct from and more efficient at CTL activation in comparison to those generated by the
constitutive proteasome [27].I-proteasomes exhibit both immune and non-immune functions and play an important role in
controlling infections and combating illnesses. One study demonstrated reduced T cell
repertoire, including CD8+ T-cell counts, in LMP2−/− mice in comparison to
wild-type (C57BL/6) control mice [4]. Another study
reported that inhibition of the i-proteasome subunit LMP7 resulted in decreased IFN-γ
production and reduced differentiation of naïve CD4+ T-cells into T helper cell (Th)-17 cells
[24]. These findings suggest that the i-proteasome is
functionally involved in the generation of the T cell repertoire, regulation of the
pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and controls Th cell differentiation. I-proteasome was
also reported to be upregulated in prostate cancer, multiple myeloma, and lung cancer, but
another report confirmed that i-proteasome expression was downregulated in cancers of the
colon, kidney, skin, neck, head, and esophagus [23].
These results suggested that the variation in the expression of i-proteasomes is attributed to
the different types of cancers. Collectively, these studies provide a greater understanding of
the role of the i-proteasome system in the overall health and well-being of the host. For
instance, changes in proteasome subunit composition and expression observed in the different
mammalian tissues are closely associated with various autoimmune disorders, inflammatory
diseases, and cancers in both humans and mice. However, the expression pattern and composition
of the i-proteasome is poorly studied in various tissues of other species such as pigs.Previous studies in our laboratory suggested that the i-proteasomes expression is markedly
altered in the porcine lung and thymus upon infection with porcine reproductive and
respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). In vitro assays further confirmed that
the expression of i-proteasomes is increased in IFN-γ-stimulated primary alveolar macrophages
(AMs) [20]. However, the AMs were identified as only
one cell type to readily express low levels of i-proteasome subunits. The i-proteasome
subunits expression confined to the cytoplasm and nucleus in AMs under normal conditions. In
addition, i-proteasome expression could also be detected in other lung parenchymal cells
including alveolar type I and II cells, bronchial epithelial cells in the lung, and epithelial
cells in the thymus of PRRSV-infected pigs [19, 20]. However, expression of the i-proteasome in other
non-immune cells of pigs has not been reported, and little is known about the levels of
proteasome subpopulations and their modulation in non-immune cells such as epithelial cells.
In the present study, we used porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells, an epithelial cell model
susceptible to many viral infections in pigs, to determine the i-proteasome expression in
PK-15 upon in vitro stimulation of these cells with IFN-γ and TNF-α. A better
understanding of the role of the i-proteasome in different cell types, tissues, and hosts
would facilitate the development of antiviral adaptive immune responses against intracellular
infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and IFN-γ or TNF-α treatment
PK-15 cells were cultured in 6-well plates (Corning, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A.) at an
appropriate density in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA,
U.S.A.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100
U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin, at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. Cells were stimulated
with different concentrations of IFN-γ including 2,000, 1,000, 500, and 250
ng/ml and TNF-α including 1,000, 500, 250, 50, and 5
ng/ml. To evaluate the effects of cytokines on the
growth of PK-15 cells in vitro, cell viability of these cells were
examined under the respective optimized concentrations mentioned above, using cell
counting kit 8 (CCK-8; Beyotime Biotechnology, Beijing, China) in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions. Furthermore, to assess the i-proteasome expression upon
cytokine stimulation, after culturing for 24 hr, PK-15 cells were treated with either
1,000 ng/ml IFN-γ (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO,
U.S.A.), or 500 ng/ml TNF-α (Sigma-Aldrich) separately,
or with a combination of TNF-α (500 ng/ml) and IFN-γ
(1,000 ng/ml). Cell culture medium alone was used as a
negative control. Cells were harvested with a cell scraper at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr
after stimulation. The expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was
determined at the mRNA and protein level by quantitative reverse transcription PCR
(RT-qPCR) and western blotting, respectively.
RT-qPCR analysis
RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.). About 1
µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the reverse transcription
system kit (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) by following the manufacturers’ instructions. Relative
gene expression was determined using the SYBR Green Kit (Takara). The sense and antisense
primers for target genes are listed in Supplementary
Table 1. Amplification conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, 90°C for 10
min, with 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C and 72°C for 30 sec each, with a final
incubation at 4°C. Gene expression was normalized to the mRNA content of
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and the results were presented as
fold-change values for IFN-γ and TNF-α (alone or in combination) for the treated group
relative to the control group and were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method
[1].
Western blotting
Treated and untreated PK-15 cells were harvested and lysed in RIPA lysis solution
(Beyotime Biotechnology). Lysates were then prepared and immunoblotted with antibodies
against LMP2, LMP7 (Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.), MECL-1 (Abcam), α5 (Abcam), and β-actin
(Abcam). Signal were visualized using the DyLightTM 800 goat anti-rabbit or
mouseIgG (H+L) (KPL, MA, U.S.A.) secondary antibody diluted at 1/10,000 in PBS, for 40
min. Bands were visualized using the Odyssey Imaging System (Li-cor Biosciences, Lincoln,
NE, U.S.A.). The expression level of i-proteasome subunits relative to that of β-actin was
quantified using the Image-J software (NIMH, Bethesda, MD, U.S.A.).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed at least in triplicates and statistical analysis of data
was performed using the Mann-Whitney test to compare the RT-qPCR results. The results were
considered statistically significant or very significant when P values
were less than 0.05 or 0.01, indicated by * or **, respectively. All the analyzed graphs
were constructed using GraphPad Prism (Version 7.02, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA,
U.S.A.).
RESULTS
IFN-γ induces the expression of immunoproteasome-coding genes in PK-15 cells
To analyze the i-proteasome expression in porcine epithelial cells upon IFN-γ
stimulation, PK-15porcine epithelial cells, which are susceptible to numerous viral
infections [2, 34], were selected and stimulated with or without IFN-γ from 6 to 48 hr. IFN-γ
exerted no significant effect on cell viability at 2,000, 1,000, 500, and 250
ng/ml (Fig.
1A) and 1,000 ng/ml was selected for cellular
stimulation after treatment (Fig. 1B). The mRNA
expression levels of the i-proteasome subunit LMP2 increased after 6 hr of IFN-γ treatment
and reached a maximum level after 12 hr of IFN-γ treatment (Fig. 1C). In contrast, LMP7 and MECL-1 levels were sustained up to
a maximum level at 48 hr. However, α5, which is an indicator of total proteasome levels,
was sustained at a low level regardless of IFN-γ treatment time. Among the genes that were
differentially regulated in IFN-γ treated PK-15 cells, LMP2 expression was significantly
upregulated in comparison to that of LMP7 and MECL-1 after 6 to 24 hr of IFN-γ treatment
(P<0.05). After 24 hr, no differences were observed among the
expression levels of LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 (P>0.05). However, the
expression of all three i-proteasomes subunits was markedly higher than that of α5 after
IFN-γ stimulation of PK-15 cells from 6 to 48 hr (P<0.05) (Fig. 1C). We further determined the protein levels
of the LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 in PK-15 cells that were untreated with or treated with
IFN-γ at 1,000 ng/ml. In comparison to the untreated
PK-15 cells, the protein levels of LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 elevated significantly in
IFN-γ-treated PK-15 cells in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1D). However, α5 was sustained at low level regardless of the time after
IFN-γ treatment (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these
results indicate that IFN-γ induces the expression of all three i-proteasomes subunits
LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 at both the mRNA and protein levels in PK-15 cells.
Fig. 1.
Expression of i-proteasome subunits in porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells exposed to
interferon (IFN)-γ. Optimization of IFN-γ concentrations for stimulation. (A)
Viability of PK-15 cells treated with different concentration of IFN-γ. To evaluate
the effects of IFN-γ on the growth of the PK-15 cells, a cell viability assay was
carried out using cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. (B) Cells were stimulated with IFN-γ at different stimulation
concentrations including 2,000, 1,000, 500, 250, and 0
ng/ml. The protein expression of LMP2, LMP7,
MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15 cells treated with IFN-γ for 24 hr, by western
blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric analyses. (C) Relative fold changes of mRNA
expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1, and α5 in IFN-γ treated
PK-15 cells were compared to that of untreated cells. Cells were treated with IFN-γ
for different time durations. Results are representative of three independent
experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (D) The
protein expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in IFN-γ treated PK-15
cells by western blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric analyses.
Expression of i-proteasome subunits in porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells exposed to
interferon (IFN)-γ. Optimization of IFN-γ concentrations for stimulation. (A)
Viability of PK-15 cells treated with different concentration of IFN-γ. To evaluate
the effects of IFN-γ on the growth of the PK-15 cells, a cell viability assay was
carried out using cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. (B) Cells were stimulated with IFN-γ at different stimulation
concentrations including 2,000, 1,000, 500, 250, and 0
ng/ml. The protein expression of LMP2, LMP7,
MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15 cells treated with IFN-γ for 24 hr, by western
blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric analyses. (C) Relative fold changes of mRNA
expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1, and α5 in IFN-γ treated
PK-15 cells were compared to that of untreated cells. Cells were treated with IFN-γ
for different time durations. Results are representative of three independent
experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. (D) The
protein expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in IFN-γ treated PK-15
cells by western blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric analyses.
TNF-α induces the expression of immunoproteasome-coding genes in PK-15 cells
The level of IFN-γ and TNF-α were significantly increased in the inflamed regions of the
HP-PRRSV-infected-lung in comparison to their levels in normal lung [8]. We next assessed the effect of another proinflammatory cytokine
(TNF-α) on the expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in PK-15 cells
with or without TNF-α stimulation from 6 to 48 hr. The different TNF-α stimulation
concentrations including 1,000, 500, 250, 50, and 5
ng/ml did not significantly influence cell viability
(Fig. 2A), and 500 ng/ml was selected for subsequent
cellular treatments (Fig. 2B). TNF-α treatment
significantly increased the mRNA levels of all three i-proteasome subunits, LMP2, LMP7,
and MECL-1 in the PK-15 cells in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2C). LMP2 expression increased in TNF-α treated Pk-15 cells
after 6 hr in comparison to that in cells without TNF-α treatment, and their expression
levels reached a maximum at 36 hr in TNF-α treated PK-15 cells. In contrast, LMP7 and
MECL-1 levels were sustained at the maximum level for up to 48 hr. However, α5 was
sustained at a low level regardless of the time period for which TNF-α treatment was
administered. Among the differentially regulated genes, the expression of LMP2 was
significantly upregulated in comparison to LMP7 and MECL-1 in TNF-α treated PK-15 cells at
24 to 36 hr (P<0.05). No differences were observed in the expressions
of the three i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in TNF-α treated PK-15 cells
from 6 to 12 hr (P>0.05). However, the expression levels of all three
i-proteasome subunits were markedly higher than that of α5 in PK-15 cells after TNF-α
stimulation from 24 to 48 hr (P<0.05) (Fig. 2C). At the protein level, LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 were
significantly upregulated in PK-15 cells upon TNF-α treatment in a time-dependent manner,
in comparison to that of the untreated cells (Fig.
2D). α5 was also increased in a time-dependent manner regardless of TNF-α
treatment, but to a lesser extent (Fig. 2D).
Taken together, these results are consistent with our RT-qPCR results and indicate that
TNF-α induces the expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in PK-15
cells at both the transcriptional and translational levels.
Fig. 2.
Expression of i-proteasome subunits in porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells exposed to
tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Optimization of TNF-α concentrations for stimulation.
(A) Viability of PK-15 cells treated with different concentration of TNF-α. To
evaluate the effects of TNF-α on the growth of the PK-15 cells, a cell viability
assay was carried out using cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) by following the
manufacturer’s instructions. (B) Different stimulation concentrations including
1,000, 500, 250, 50, 5, and 0 ng/ml for TNF-α were
selected. The protein expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15
cells exposed to TNF-α for 24 hr by western blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric
analyses. (C) Relative fold changes of mRNA expression of i-proteasome subunits
LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1, and α5 in TNF-α treated PK-15 cells were compared to that of
untreated cells. PK-15 cells were treated with TNF-α for different time durations.
Results are representative of three independent experiments.
*P<0.05, **P<0.01. (D) The protein
expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15 cells treated with
TNF-α by western blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric analyses.
Expression of i-proteasome subunits in porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells exposed to
tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Optimization of TNF-α concentrations for stimulation.
(A) Viability of PK-15 cells treated with different concentration of TNF-α. To
evaluate the effects of TNF-α on the growth of the PK-15 cells, a cell viability
assay was carried out using cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) by following the
manufacturer’s instructions. (B) Different stimulation concentrations including
1,000, 500, 250, 50, 5, and 0 ng/ml for TNF-α were
selected. The protein expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15
cells exposed to TNF-α for 24 hr by western blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric
analyses. (C) Relative fold changes of mRNA expression of i-proteasome subunits
LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1, and α5 in TNF-α treated PK-15 cells were compared to that of
untreated cells. PK-15 cells were treated with TNF-α for different time durations.
Results are representative of three independent experiments.
*P<0.05, **P<0.01. (D) The protein
expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15 cells treated with
TNF-α by western blotting. Numbers indicate densitometric analyses.
Proinflammatory cytokines induce immunoproteasomal expression in PK-15 cells
Collectively, the above data demonstrate that i-proteasome subunits are induced by IFN-γ
as well as TNF-α. We further assessed the combined effect of these cytokines on
i-proteasomal expression. PK-15 cells were exposed for 6–48 hr, either separately to IFN-γ
and TNF-α, or to a combination treatment of these two cytokines. The expression level of
i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 was then quantified. At the mRNA level, in
comparison to individual cytokine treatments, the combination treatment of both the
cytokines induced a significant increase (P<0.05) in LMP2 (Fig. 3A) and LMP7 (Fig. 3B) expression, but not
in MECL-1 (Fig. 3C) expression, which sustained
for up to 24 hr in PK-15 cells. The level of α5 also increased till 24 hr, although to a
lesser extent, regardless of the nature of the treatments, (Fig. 3D). In addition, at the protein level, 24 hr exposure to the
combination IFN-γ plus TNF-α induced an increase in the expression of i-proteasome
subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1, but these expression levels were lower than those with
the individual cytokine treatment (Fig. 3E). A
similar induction pattern was observed in PK-15 cells treated for 48 hr with the cytokine
combination and individual cytokines (Fig.
3F).
Fig. 3.
Porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells were treated with a combination of tumor necrosis
factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ for 6–48 hr. Relative fold changes of mRNA
expression for i-proteasome subunits LMP2 (A), LMP7 (B), MECL-1 (C) and α5 (D) in
TNF-α and IFN-γ treated cells were compared to that of untreated cells. Cell were
treated with TNF-α and IFN-γ for 6–48 hr. Results are representative of three
independent experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
The protein expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15 cells
exposed to TNF-α plus IFN-γ for 24 hr (E) or 48 hr (F) by western blotting. Numbers
indicate densitometric analyses.
Porcine kidney (PK)-15 cells were treated with a combination of tumor necrosis
factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ for 6–48 hr. Relative fold changes of mRNA
expression for i-proteasome subunits LMP2 (A), LMP7 (B), MECL-1 (C) and α5 (D) in
TNF-α and IFN-γ treated cells were compared to that of untreated cells. Cell were
treated with TNF-α and IFN-γ for 6–48 hr. Results are representative of three
independent experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
The protein expression of LMP2, LMP7, MECL-1, and α5 was assessed in PK-15 cells
exposed to TNF-α plus IFN-γ for 24 hr (E) or 48 hr (F) by western blotting. Numbers
indicate densitometric analyses.
DISCUSSION
I-proteasome-mediated protein cleavage plays important roles in controlling cell functions
including cell growth, differentiation, metabolism, and immune regulation [25]. In this study, we examined the role of i-proteasomes
in non-immune cells (porcine kidney cells in vitro) based on their
expression and modulation during pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulation. The results of this
study demonstrates for the first time that the expression of i-proteasome subunits in
porcine epithelial cells (such as PK-15) is regulated by IFN-γ as well as TNF-α.
Importantly, our studies indicate that in comparison to treatment with individual cytokines,
the combination treatment of IFN-γ plus TNF-α increases the expression of i-proteasome
subunits LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 in PK-15 cells at the transcriptional level, but decreases
their expression at the translational level. These results provide critical insight into the
expression of i-proteasomes in non-immune cells, which contributes further to our
understanding of the functions of i-proteasome in tissue pathogenesis.IFN-γ is a well-known strong inducer of i-proteasomes in humans and mice [13]. The cytokine IFN-γ is mainly synthesized by
activated T lymphocytes and natural killer cells and has pleiotropic effects on the growth,
differentiation, and development of different tissues [6]. The receptors for IFN-γ are mostly expressed on hematopoietic cells (NK, NKT,
Th1, and CTL cells) [28]. Our previous study
confirmed that cultured immune cells such as AMs could upregulate the expression of
i-proteasome subunits upon in vitro stimulation with IFN-γ [20]. Several studies have reported the expression of
IFN-γ receptor on A549 cells originating from alveolar epithelium [29]. Induction of i-proteasome subunit expression by IFN-γ has been well
established in vitro with cultured retinal epithelial cells [14]. Induction of i-proteasomes in various cells likely
occurs due to the persistent activation of IFN intracellular signaling pathways. Binding of
transcription factors such as STAT-1 and IRF-1 to multiple IFN-γ activation sequences in the
promoter region of i-proteasome subunits including LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 triggers their
upregulation [7].TNF-α is mainly secreted by macrophages, and its receptors are present on most cell types,
including epithelial cells [31]. The binding of TNF-α
to their receptors causes activation of the NF-κB or MAPK pathways, which mediate the
transcription of a vast array of genes involved in cell survival, differentiation and
proliferation, inflammatory response, and apoptotic process (anti-apoptotic and
pro-apoptotic factors) [33]. Several studies have
confirmed that i-proteasomes impaired the NF-κB activation in lymphocytes from
βli−/− mice [16] as well as in
βli−/− and β5i−/− T2 human lymphocyte cell lines but did not do the
same in their parental T1 cell line [17]. These
results suggest that i-proteasomes play an important role in TNF-α-induced apoptosis through
modulation of the NF-κB pathway. Some studies on i-proteasome induction by TNF-α in
non-immune cells report contradictory results. A study showed that i-proteasomes are
expressed in humantumor cells of non-hematological origin following induction by cytokines
including IFN-γ or TNF-α [11]. However, another study
demonstrated that three murine cell lines of non-hematopoietic origin almost exclusively
expressed constitutive proteasomes, whereas the expression of i-proteasomes could be induced
in such cells following their exposure to IFN-γ, but not to TNF-α [5]. In this study, we observed that the i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7,
and MECL-1 could be induced by TNF-α treatment in PK-15 cells, though less efficiently than
that inducible by IFN-γ at both transcriptional and translational levels. These
contradictory results are probably due to differences in the species. The complete pig
genome is available online, and data regarding the comparison of mouse, human, and pig
immune systems have revealed that the immune system of pigs more closely resembles that of
humans than that of mice [10]. In addition, the
concentration and duration of cytokines stimulation, cell populations, and phenotypes should
also be considered in the context of these contradictory results.An initial study reported that TNF-α acts synergistically with IFN-γ to upregulate
i-proteasome subunit β5i [15], implying that other
pro-inflammatory cytokines combined with IFN-γ may regulate i-proteasome. Previous results
and the present results suggest that the i-proteasome can be induced by IFN-γ in porcine
immune cells, such as AMs and dendritic cells (DCs), and in porcine non-immune cells such as
epithelial cells; in addition it can also be induced by TNF-α in non-immune cells in
vitro. These results are concurrent with those of previous reports on marked
upregulation of i-proteasomes in PRRSV-infected lung parenchymal cells, wherein IFN-γ and
TNF-α are consistently and robustly expressed in the inflamed regions in the lung [8]. In addition, in comparison to the effect of individual
cytokine treatments, enhanced effects were observed for combination treatments of IFN-γ and
TNF-α, on the expression of i-proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7 and MECL-1 at the
transcriptional level. Although the precise mechanism underlying the enhanced effects of the
combination treatments of IFN-γ and TNF-α is unclear at the transcriptional level, this
enhancement may have resulted from the increase in the number of TNF-α receptors induced by
IFN-γ, as observed in numerous cell types [3, 32]. Furthermore, our results show that IFN-γ and TNF-α,
alone or in combination, differentially regulated the synthesis of the i-proteasome subunits
LMP2, LMP7, and MECL-1 at the translational level, and these effects were mediated by
post-transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms. Protein synthesis occurs
in a multiple ribosomal structure called a polyribosome [9]. In Cap-dependent translation, the ribosome identifies the translation
initiation site by sliding along the mRNA or in the Cap-independent translation, the
ribosome directly enters the interior of the mRNA by recognizing a particular internal
ribosome entry site (IRES). The ribosome complex in eukaryotic cells tightly regulates the
intricate events including translational initiation, mRNA scanning and protein elongation
[9]. One robust method to interfere with protein
synthesis is to regulate ribosome abundance and composition and to interfere ribosome
interaction with specific mRNAs [9, 22]. In addition, the amount of protein is also
controlled by other factors including, the rate of gene transcription, mRNA nucleation,
cytoplasmic localization, transcript stability, translational regulation, and protein
degradation [21, 26, 30]. However, further studies are
required to elucidate the detailed mechanism underlying the enhanced effects of the
combination treatment of IFN-γ and TNF-α. In conclusion, our results confirm that
pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ and TNF-α) can regulate the expression of i-proteasomes in
porcine non-immune cells.
Authors: Alexander Burov; Sergei Funikov; Elmira Vagapova; Alexandra Dalina; Alexander Rezvykh; Elena Shyrokova; Timofey Lebedev; Ekaterina Grigorieva; Vladimir Popenko; Olga Leonova; Daria Spasskaya; Pavel Spirin; Vladimir Prassolov; Vadim Karpov; Alexey Morozov Journal: Cells Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 6.600