Literature DB >> 3154808

Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex.

S LeVay1, T Voigt.   

Abstract

The orientation selectivity, ocular dominance, and binocular disparity tuning of 272 cells in areas 17 and 18 of barbiturate-anesthetized, paralyzed cats were studied with automated, quantitative techniques. Disparity was varied along the axis orthogonal to each cell's best orientation. Binocular correspondence was established by means of a reference electrode positioned at the boundary of lamina A and A1 in the area centralis representation of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Measures were derived that expressed each cell's disparity sensitivity and best disparity and the shape and slope of its tuning curve. Cells were found that corresponded to categories described by previous authors ("disparity-insensitive," "tuned excitatory," "near," and "far" cells), but many others had intermediate response patterns, or patterns that were difficult to categorize. Quantitative analysis suggested that the various types belong to a continuum. No relationship could be established between a cell's best orientation and its ocular dominance or any aspect of its disparity tuning. There was no relationship between a cell's ocular dominance and its sensitivity to disparity. Ocular dominance and best disparity were related. As reported by others, cells with best disparities close to zero (the fixation plane) tended to have balanced ocularity, while cells with best disparities in the near or far range had a broad distribution of ocular dominance. Among cells with receptive fields near the vertical meridian, those preferring far disparities tended to be dominated by the contralateral eye, and those preferring near disparities by the ipsilateral eye. It is suggested that this relationship follows from the geometry of near and far images and the pattern of decussation in the visual pathway. There was a significant grouping of cells with similar best disparities along tangential electrode tracks. We believe that this grouping is due to the columnar organization for ocular dominance and the relationship between ocular dominance and best disparity. No evidence was found for a columnar segregation of disparity-sensitive and disparity-insensitive cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3154808     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800004168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  47 in total

1.  The subregion correspondence model of binocular simple cells.

Authors:  E Erwin; K D Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Plasticity in adult cat visual cortex (area 17) following circumscribed monocular lesions of all retinal layers.

Authors:  M B Calford; C Wang; V Taglianetti; W J Waleszczyk; W Burke; B Dreher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments.

Authors:  S J Prince; A D Pointon; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Binocular interaction and disparity coding at the 17-18 border: contribution of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  F Lepore; A Samson; M C Paradis; M Ptito; J P Guillemot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Functional characterization of spikelet activity in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Sari Andoni; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  The cortical column: a structure without a function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Horton; Daniel L Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Loss of stereopsis following lesions of cortical areas 17-18 in the cat.

Authors:  M Ptito; F Lepore; J P Guillemot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.