| Literature DB >> 31547001 |
Lukas Sommerauer1, Jakub Grzybek2, Michael S Elsaesser3, Artur Benisek4, Thomas Sepperer5,6, Edgar Dachs7, Nicola Hüsing8, Alexander Petutschnigg9, Gianluca Tondi10,11,12.
Abstract
Furfuryl alcohol (FA) and lactic acid (LA) are two of the most interesting biomolecules, easily obtainable from sugars and hence extremely attractive for green chemistry solutions. These substances undergo homopolymerization and they have been rarely considered for copolymerization. Typically, FA homopolymerizes exothermically in an acid environment producing inhomogeneous porous materials, but recent studies have shown that this reaction can be controlled and therefore we have implemented this process to trigger the copolymerization with LA. The mechanical tests have shown that the blend containing small amount of FA were rigid and the fracture showed patterns more similar to the one of neat polyfurfuryl alcohol (PFA). This LA-rich blend exhibited higher chloroform and water resistances, while thermal analyses (TG and DSC) also indicated a higher furanic character than expected. These observations suggested an intimate interconnection between precursors which was highlighted by the presence of a small band in the ester region of the solid state 13C-NMR, even if the FT-IR did not evidence any new signal. These studies show that these bioplastics are basically constituted of PLA and PFA homopolymers with some small portion of covalent bonds between the two moieties.Entities:
Keywords: Carbohydrate derivatives; bio-based materials; bio-resources; biopolymers; green resins; sustainable macromolecules
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547001 PMCID: PMC6835956 DOI: 10.3390/polym11101533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Formulation of the biopolymers in % by weight, bending resistance & water solubility.
| Label | Furfuryl Alcohol (%) | Lactic Acid (%) | Bending Resistance (MoR) 1 | Solubility in Water (%) 1 | Solubility in Chloroform (%) 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFA−2 | 100 | 0 | 13.7 (5.6) | 2.36 (1.08) | 1.23 (0.20) |
| F/L 75/25 | 75 | 25 | 28.1 (6.3) | 1.55 (0.89) | 18.46 (0.21) |
| F/L 50/50 | 50 | 50 | 25.4 (1.9) | 2.05 (1.04) | 31.15 (0.83) |
| F/L 25/75 | 25 | 75 | 7.2 (0.3) | 2.33 (1.44) | 55.45 (3.20) |
| PLA | 0 | 100 | Elastic | 9.12 (13.42) | 98.29 (2.37) |
1 Standard deviations are reported in brackets. 2 0.2 mL of sulfuric acid were added to start the polymerization.
Figure 1Bending strength of PFA, PLA and their mixtures.
Figure 2SEM micrographs of PFA (a,b), F/L 50/50 (c,d) and PLA (e,f); magnification 1000 (top) and 15,000 (bottom).
Figure 3TGA analysis under synthetic air of the samples from pure PFA and PLA as well as the mixed formulations with ratios F/L 75/25, F/L 50/50, F/L 25/75.
Figure 4Differential scanning calorimetry of the 5 samples: PFA, F/L 75/25, F/L 50/50, F/L 25/75 and PLA.
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of PLA, PFA and the three mixed formulations.
Figure 6Solid state 13C–NMR spectra of PLA, PFA and three mixed formulations.
Figure 7Possible copolymerization reaction between FA and LA moieties.