| Literature DB >> 31546995 |
Shaphan Y Chia1,2, Chrysantus M Tanga3, Isaac M Osuga4, Alphonce O Alaru5, David M Mwangi6, Macdonald Githinji7, Sevgan Subramanian8, Komi K M Fiaboe9, Sunday Ekesi10, Joop J A van Loon11, Marcel Dicke12.
Abstract
Pig production is one of the fastest growing livestock sectors. Development of this sector is hampered by rapidly increasing costs of fishmeal (FM), which is a common protein source in animal feeds. Here, we explored the potential of substituting FM with black soldier fly larval meal (BSFLM) on growth and blood parameters of pigs as well as economic aspects. At weaning, 40 hybrid pigs, i.e., crossbreeds of purebred Large White and Landrace were randomly assigned to five iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic dietary treatments: Control (0% BSFLM and 100% FM (T0)), and FM replaced at 25% (T25), 50% (T50), 75% (T75) and 100% (T100) with BSFLM. Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated for the whole trial. Hematological and serum biochemical parameters, the cost-benefit ratio (CBR) and return on investment (RoI) were evaluated. No significant effect of diet type was observed on feed intake and daily weight gain. Red or white blood cell indices did not differ among diets. Pigs fed T25, T75 and T100, had lower platelet counts compared to T0 and T50. Dietary inclusion of BSFLM did not affect blood total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein. CBR and RoI were similar for the various diets. In conclusion, BSFLM is a suitable and cost-effective alternative to fishmeal in feed for growing pigs.Entities:
Keywords: alternative protein; animal feeds; blood parameters; cost benefit analysis; growing pigs; insect larval meal; return on investment
Year: 2019 PMID: 31546995 PMCID: PMC6826664 DOI: 10.3390/ani9100705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Ingredients, composition of black soldier fly larval meal and experimental diets.
| Parameter | BSFLM | Dietary Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T25 | T50 | T75 | T100 | ||
| Ingredient (kg) | ||||||
| Maize meal | - | 12.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 15.0 |
| Wheat pollard | - | 52.0 | 35.0 | 33.0 | 35.2 | 34.2 |
| Rice polishing | - | 22.0 | 30.5 | 32.0 | 29.8 | 28.3 |
| Fishmeal | - | 10.0 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | - |
| BSFLM | - | - | 9.0 | 12 | 14.5 | 18.5 |
| Lysine | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Methionine | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Salt | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bone meal | - | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Limestone | - | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Vitamin and mineral premix a | - | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Dry matter (DM; %) | 94.9 | 92.6 | 94.0 | 92.4 | 93.2 | 94.0 |
| Crude protein (% DM) | 46.6 | 15.4 | 15.3 | 15.0 | 15.7 | 14.8 |
| Essential amino acids (% DM) | ||||||
| Lysine | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Methionine | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Methionine + Cystine | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Isoleucine | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Leucine | 2.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Threonine | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Phenylalanine | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Valine | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Arginine | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Histidine | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Nonessential amino acids (% DM) | ||||||
| Alanine | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Aspartic acid | 3.9 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| Cystine | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Glutamic acid | 4.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Glycine | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Proline | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Serine | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. DM = dry matter. Amino acid values are means of duplicate analyses. a Premix provided per kg diet: Vitamin A 6,000,000 IU; Vitamin D3 1,000,000 IU; Vitamin E 5000 IU; Vitamin K3—KASTAB 3000 mg; Vitamin B2 —riboflavin 4500 mg; Vitamin B3—nicotinic acid 22,000 mg; Vitamin B5—pantothenic acid 16,000 mg; Vitamin B6 —pyridoxine 2250 mg; Vitamin B9—folic acid 350 mg; Vitamin H—biotin 50 mg, Vitamin B12—cobalamin 22 mg; choline chloride 150,000 mg; antioxidant 125,000 mg; iron (Fe) 40,000 mg, manganese (Mn) 40,000 mg; zinc (Zn) 100,000 mg, copper (Cu) 25,000 mg; iodine (I) 1000 mg, cobalt (Co) 250 mg, selenium (Se) 100 mg.
Mineral and proximate composition of experimental diets.
| Parameter | Dietary Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T25 | T50 | T75 | T100 | |
| Boron (ppm) | 4.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.1 |
| Molybdenum (ppm) | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Iron (ppm) | 750.5 | 731.0 | 632.6 | 518.4 | 529.2 |
| Copper (ppm) | 22.6 | 501.1 | 80.5 | 16.7 | 22.8 |
| Zinc (ppm) | 121.4 | 110.6 | 114.1 | 102.3 | 112.6 |
| Cobalt (ppm) | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Manganese (ppm) | 295.4 | 257.0 | 264.1 | 243.0 | 222.9 |
| Sodium (ppm) | 2439.8 | 1648.6 | 1097.8 | 1138.8 | 998.9 |
| Sulphur (%) | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Magnesium (%) | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Potassium (%) | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Phosphorus (%) | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Calcium (%) | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| Sugar (%) | 4.5 | 5.1 | 6.2 | 6.5 | 8.7 |
| Starch (%) | 29.2 | 25.3 | 27.6 | 20.7 | 26.9 |
| Ash (%) | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.1 | 10.1 | 8.9 |
| Acid detergent fiber (%) | 15.3 | 19.0 | 17.0 | 20.7 | 15.4 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 37.7 | 42.8 | 41.6 | 47.0 | 39.7 |
| Digestibility (NCGD) (%) | 79.3 | 73.5 | 75.0 | 70.0 | 76.9 |
| Oil (%) | 5.0 | 8.1 | 8.9 | 9.8 | 12.2 |
| Net energy (MJ/kg) | 9.5 | 9.8 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 12.0 |
TT0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. NCGD = neutral cellulase gammanase digestibility, ppm = parts per million.
Effects of dietary BSFLM inclusion on the growth performance of growing pigs.
| Parameter | Sex | Dietary Treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T25 | T50 | T75 | T100 | Diet | Sex | Diet × Sex | ||
| Initial weight, kg | F | 19.5 ± 1.73 | 16.8 ± 0.63 | 17.1 ± 0.66 | 17.0 ± 0.87 | 18.5 ± 0.71 | |||
| M | 18.8 ± 1.56 | 17.1 ± 0.85 | 18.5 ± 0.89 | 18.5 ± 0.79 | 20.8 ± 0.83 | ||||
| Overall | 19.1 ± 1.09 | 17.0 ± 0.49 | 17.8 ± 0.57 | 17.8 ± 0.61 | 19.6 ± 0.66 | 0.080 | 0.152 | 0.628 | |
| Final weight, kg | F | 56.3 ± 4.3 | 50.8 ± 2.65 | 56.3 ± 1.45 | 47.8 ± 1.76 | 50.0 ± 1.43 | |||
| M | 53.8 ± 3.56 | 53.5 ± 3.68 | 53.9 ± 4.90 | 53.0 ± 1.97 | 56.9 ± 0.99 | ||||
| Overall | 55.0 ± 2.63 | 52.1 ± 2.16 | 55.1 ± 2.41 | 50.4 ± 1.58 | 53.4 ± 1.53 | 0.474 | 0.295 | 0.395 | |
| Average daily gain, kg | F | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | |||
| M | 0.59 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | ||||
| Overall | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.126 | 0.408 | 0.641 | |
BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. General linear model (GLM) p < 0.05. For each diet, n = 4; F = female; M = male. Overall = data for female and male pigs pooled together. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM.
Figure 1Mean (±SE) weekly body weight of pigs fed BSFLM-based diets and a control diet. BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. For each diet, four males and four females were investigated.
Figure 2Body weight gain (mean ± SE) of pigs fed BSFLM-based diets and a control diet for the whole trial. Bars followed by the same letter are not significantly different: p < 0.05, general linear model (GLM, least significant difference test (LSD)). BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. For each diet, four males and four females were investigated. Data for female and male pigs pooled together because there is no significant effect of sex. n = 8 per bar.
Figure 3Average daily feed intake (±SE) in pigs fed BSFLM-based diets and a control diet. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different: p < 0.05, general linear model (GLM), BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. n = 8 per bar.
Figure 4Feed conversion ratio (mean ± SE) for pigs fed BSFLM-based diets and a control diet. Bars with different letters are significantly different: p < 0.05; general linear model (GLM), LSD. BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. n = 8 per bar.
Effects of dietary BSFLM inclusion on red blood cell indices and platelet count of growing pigs.
| Parameter | Dietary Treatment | Normal Range | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T25 | T50 | T75 | T100 | |||
| RBC (×1012 /L) | 5.4 ± 2.3 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.6 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 0.725 | 5.0–8.00 |
| Hb (g/dL) | 10.2 ± 4.3 | 13.3 ± 0.2 | 13.8 ± 0.4 | 12.8 ± 1.0 | 13.5 ± 0.3 | 0.719 | 10.7–16.7 |
| Hct (%) | 35.5 ± 15 | 48.0 ± 1.0 | 47.6 ± 1.7 | 45.2 ± 3.2 | 47.0 ± 2.1 | 0.704 | 32.0–50.0 |
| MCV (fl) | 64.4 ± 1.7 | 69.1 ± 3.0 | 64.4 ± 3.2 | 66.5 ± 1.8 | 68.1 ± 2.4 | 0.593 | 50.0–68.0 |
| MCH (pg) | 19.3 ± 0.5 | 19.1 ± 0.8 | 18.6 ± 0.8 | 18.8 ± 0.4 | 19.6 ± 0.3 | 0.803 | 17.0–21.0 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 30.0 ± 1.5 | 27.8 ± 0.1 | 28.9 ± 0.2 | 28.3 ± 0.8 | 28.8 ± 0.7 | 0.449 | 30.0–34.0 |
| RDW (%) | 20.5 ± 1.7 | 21.8 ± 0.2 | 22.0 ± 0.5 | 21.6 ± 1.0 | 22.2 ± 0.4 | 0.706 | 15.0–27.0 |
| Platelet (K/uL) | 382 ± 7.0 1 a | 209 ± 49 c | 328 ± 33 ab | 229 ± 27 bc | 251 ± 28 bc | 0.042 | 300–700 |
BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. RBC = red blood cell, Hb = hemoglobin, Hct = hematocrit, MCV = mean corpuscular volume, MCH = mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, RDW = red cell distribution width. 1,a,b,c n = 2. Means (± SE) within a row followed by different letters are significantly different: p < 0.05, general linear model (GLM), LSD. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. For each diet, three pigs were investigated.
Effects of dietary BSFLM inclusion on white blood cell and serum biochemical indices of growing pigs.
| Parameter | Dietary Treatment | Normal Range | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T25 | T50 | T75 | T100 | |||
| WBC (k/L) | 17.3 ± 1.6 | 24.5 ± 2.7 | 20.6 ± 2.5 | 24.0 ± 3.6 | 24.8 ± 5.0 | 0.463 | 11.0–22.0 |
| Differential count (%) | |||||||
| Neutrophils | 24.2 ± 1.0 c | 24.7 ± 0.4 c | 27.1 ± 1.1 bc | 29.9 ± 2.9 ab | 31.8 ± 0.4 a | 0.019 | 28.0–51.0 |
| Lymphocytes | 69.4 ± 1.4 | 66.8 ± 0.8 | 64.8 ± 1.2 | 62.4 ± 4.0 | 60.9 ± 1.2 | 0.092 | 39.0–62.0 |
| Monocytes | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 4.3 ± 1.2 | 0.496 | 2.00–10.0 |
| Eosinophils | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 0.684 | 0.50–11.0 |
| Basophils | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.0 | 0.585 | 0.00–2.00 |
| Blood serum indices (mmol/L) | |||||||
| Total Chol | 1.90 ± 0.16 | 2.11 ± 0.13 | 2.11 ± 0.20 | 2.50 ± 0.12 | 2.19 ± 0.12 | 0.185 | 1.68–5.81 |
| Total Trig | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.23 | 0.99 ± 0.17 | 0.89 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 0.479 | 0.11–1.13 |
| LDL | 0.67 ± 0.11 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.75 ± 0.12 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.50 | <3.00 |
| HDL | 1.23 ± 0.09 | 1.23 ± 0.07 | 1.37 ± 0.09 | 1.77 ± 0.23 | 1.53 ± 0.09 | 0.066 | >1.00 |
BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. WBC = white blood cell. Means within a row followed by different letters are significantly different: p < 0.05, general linear model (GLM), LSD. BSFLM = Black soldier fly larval meal. Chol = cholesterol, Trig = triglycerides, LDL = low density lipoproteins, HDL= high density lipoproteins. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. For each diet, three pigs were investigated.
Economic analyses of replacing fishmeal by BSFLM in growing pig diets.
| Parameter | Dietary Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T25 | T50 | T75 | T100 | ||
| Cost feed (US $/kg) | 0.5 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | - |
| Cost of protein ingredient in feed (%) | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - |
| Total feed consumed (kg/pig) | 126.6 | 128.5 | 127.9 | 121.6 | 126 | - |
| Cost of feed consumed per pig (US$), Cp | 62.89 | 67.29 | 66.14 | 61.97 | 64.43 | - |
| Final body weight of pig (kg) | 55.0 ± 2.63 | 52.1 ± 2.16 | 55.1 ± 2.41 | 50.4 ± 1.58 | 53.4 ± 1.53 | 0.474 |
| Amount at final weight (US$/live weight), Sp | 165.0 ± 7.89 | 156.4 ± 6.49 | 165.2 ± 7.22 | 151.7 ± 4.42 | 160.1 ± 4.58 | 0.477 |
| Profit, Pr | 102.1 ± 7.89 | 89.1 ± 6.49 | 99.0 ± 7.22 | 89.7 ± 4.42 | 95.9 ± 4.58 | 0.499 |
| Cost–benefit ratio, CBR | 2.6 ± 0.13 | 2.3 ± 0.10 | 2.5 ± 0.11 | 2.5 ± 0.07 | 2.5 ± 0.07 | 0.318 |
| Return on investment, RoI | 162.4 ± 13 | 132.4 ± 9.64 | 149.7 ± 11 | 144.8 ± 7.13 | 148.8 ± 7.11 | 0.318 |
BSFLM = black soldier fly larval meal. (-) values were not calculated. Cost (US $/kg) of protein ingredients used in the dietary treatments: Fishmeal (Rastrineobola argentae) = 1.20; BSFLM = 0.85. Live weight of pig = 3.00 US$/kg; Pr = Sp−Cp; CBR = Sp/Cp; RoI = Pr/Cp × 100. Final body weight, Sp, Pr, CBR and RoI are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. General linear model (GLM), p < 0.05. T0 = 0% (control), T25 = 25%, T50 = 50%, T75 = 75% and T100 = 100% levels of replacement of fishmeal with BSFLM. For each diet, eight pigs were investigated. Cp = Cost price of feed consumed per pig, Sp = Selling price per pig (amount at final weight), Pr = Profit, CP = Crude protein.