| Literature DB >> 31546927 |
Danhui Yang1,2, Zhibo Yang3,4, Zhi Zhai5,6, Xuefeng Chen7,8.
Abstract
In this contribution, the ratcheting behavior and local field distribution of unidirectional metal matrix composites are investigated under cyclic loading. To that end, we extended the finite-volume direct averaging micromechanics (FVDAM) theory by incorporating the rule of nonlinear kinematic hardening. The proposed method enables efficient and accurate simulation of the ratcheting behavior of unidirectional composites. The local satisfaction of equilibrium equations of the FVDAM theory facilitates quick and rapid convergence during the plastic iterations. To verify the proposed theory, a finite-element (FE) based unit cell model is constructed with the same mesh discretization. The remarkable correlation of the transverse response and local field distribution generated by the FVDAM and FE techniques demonstrates the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed models. The stress discontinuities along the fiber/matrix interface that are generic to the finite-element theory are absent in the FVDAM prediction. The effects of thermal residual stresses induced during the consolidation process, as well as fiber orientations, are revealed. The generated results indicate that the FVDAM is well suited for simulating the elastic-plastic ratcheting behavior of metal matrix composites, which will provide the conventional finite-element based technique with an attractive alternative.Entities:
Keywords: cyclic plasticity; finite-volume theory; homogenization; metal matrix composites; ratcheting effect; residual stresses
Year: 2019 PMID: 31546927 PMCID: PMC6766313 DOI: 10.3390/ma12183048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Unit cell discretizations.
Figure 2Parametric mapping.
Figure 3Flow chart.
Material and thermal properties for fiber and matrix.
| Matrix | Fiber | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 215 | 400 |
|
| 0.33 | 0.25 |
|
| 8 | 4.86 |
|
| 220 |
Kinematic hardening parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 4Comparison of selected local stress distributions after thermal cooldown temperature of : FEM (left); FVDAM (right).
Figure 5Comparison of the transverse thermo-mechanical tensile response with different .
Figure 6Local field distributions () after cooldown followed by the applied strain : FEM (left); FVDAM (right).
Figure 7Comparison of the convergence using the finite-element method (FEM) and the finite-volume direct averaging micromechanics (FVDAM). (a) Comparison of the transverse thermo-mechanical tensile local field in the large stress concentration area: FEM (left); FVDAM (right); (b) Comparison of the transverse thermo-mechanical tensile response of the composite at point A (left) and point B (right).
Figure 8Cyclic loading history.
Figure 9Comparison of the cyclic response of the unidirectional composite materials generated by FEM and FVDAM.
Figure 10The relation between the principal coordinates and global coordinates.
Figure 11The cyclic stress–strain response with consideration of the thermal effect for the composite materials with different fiber orientations.