Calcium antagonists and acute myocardial ischemia: comparative effects of gallopamil and nifedipine on ischemia-induced and reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias, epicardial conduction times, and ventricular fibrillation thresholds.

The comparative effects of the calcium-antagonists gallopamil and nifedipine on ischemia-induced and reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias, particularly ventricular fibrillation (VF), were assessed in a total of 40 mongrel dogs in two experimental preparations. In part I of the study, changes in the time course of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias and VF parallel to changes in epicardial conduction following acute coronary artery occlusion lasting 20 minutes and followed by subsequent reperfusion were determined. In part II, repeated coronary artery occlusions (20 min) followed by reperfusion (60 min) were performed, and changes in ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) were assessed. Gallopamil proved to be highly effective in preventing ventricular arrhythmias and VF following coronary delay was reduced. The ischemia-induced fall in conduction delay was reduced. The ischemia-induced fall in VFT occurring during the first few minutes after occlusion (phase Ia) was significantly reduced. In contrast, nifedipine failed to influence the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and VF. Following reperfusion, neither drug reduced the incidence of VF nor the associated fall in VFT at the onset of reperfusion. The time course of recovery of epicardial conduction was not affected by either drug. However, the increase in the VFT during the early postreperfusion period was significantly enhanced by both agents. The effects of gallopamil were more pronounced than those of nifedipine. Delayed reperfusion ventricular arrhythmias arising 5 to 10 minutes after release of coronary artery obstruction were significantly reduced by gallopamil whereas nifedipine proved ineffective. The results show that calcium antagonists display direct antiarrhythmic and cardioprotective actions in acute transient myocardial ischemia. The different effectiveness of gallopamil compared to nifedipine can be explained by differences in electrophysiological properties of the drugs. Enhanced ventricular vulnerability following acute transient coronary artery occlusion and subsequent release of coronary artery obstruction, first described by Tennant and Wiggers, has been extensively investigated over the past decade in a variety of experimental and clinical settings. However, the basic mechanisms underlying ischemia- and reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation (VF) have not yet been fully elucidated. Furthermore, the results of pharmacological approaches to prevent ventricular arrhythmic activity are conflicting. The present study aimed to evaluate the antiarrhythmic efficacy of calcium antagonists in acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. We have examined the effects of gallopamil and nifedipine on the time course of ventricular arrhythmias during the first 20 minutes after acute coronary artery occlusion and subsequent reperfusion. We have studied the underlying mechanisms by mapping epicardial conduction and by assessing the electrically induced ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) both within and outside ischemic areas.