Literature DB >> 31545900

Critical Assessment of the Hildebrand and Hansen Solubility Parameters for Polymers.

Shruti Venkatram1, Chiho Kim1, Anand Chandrasekaran1, Rampi Ramprasad1.   

Abstract

Solubility parameter models are widely used to select suitable solvents/nonsolvents for polymers in a variety of processing and engineering applications. In this study, we focus on two well-established models, namely, the Hildebrand and Hansen solubility parameter models. Both models are built on the basis of the notion of "like dissolves like" and identify a liquid as a good solvent for a polymer if the solubility parameters of the liquid and the polymer are close to each other. Here we make a critical and quantitative assessment of the accuracy/utility of these two models by comparing their predictions against actual experimental data. Using a data set of 75 polymers, we find that the Hildebrand model displays a predictive accuracy of 60% for solvents and 76% for nonsolvents. The Hansen model leads to a similar performance; on the basis of a data set of 25 polymers for which Hansen parameters are available, we find that it has an accuracy of 67% for solvents and 76% for nonsolvents. The availability of the Hildebrand parameters for a large polymer data set makes it a widely applicable capability, as the Hildebrand parameter for a new polymer may be determined using this data set and machine learning methods as we have done before; the predicted Hildebrand parameter for a new polymer may then be used to determine suitable solvents and nonsolvents. Such predictions are difficult to make with the Hansen model, as the data set of Hansen parameters for polymers is rather small. Nevertheless, the Hildebrand approach must be used with caution. Our analysis shows that while the Hildebrand model has a predictive accuracy of 70-75% for nonpolar polymers, it performs rather poorly for polar polymers (with an accuracy of 57%). Going forward, determination of solvents and nonsolvents for polymers may benefit by developing classification models built directly on the basis of available experimental data sets rather than utilizing the solubility parameter approach, which is limited in versatility and accuracy.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31545900     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of Deep Eutectic Systems as an Alternative to Solvents in Painting Conservation.

Authors:  Cláudio Correia Fernandes; Reza Haghbakhsh; Raquel Marques; Alexandre Paiva; Leslie Carlyle; Ana Rita Cruz Duarte
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 8.198

2.  Defining the Collapse Point in Colloidal Unimolecular Polymer (CUP) Formation.

Authors:  Ashish Zore; Peng Geng; Yuwei Zhang; Michael R Van De Mark
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Atomistic Descriptors for Machine Learning Models of Solubility Parameters for Small Molecules and Polymers.

Authors:  Mingzhe Chi; Rihab Gargouri; Tim Schrader; Kamel Damak; Ramzi Maâlej; Marek Sierka
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.329

4.  Hansen Solubility Parameter Analysis on Dispersion of Oleylamine-Capped Silver Nanoinks and their Sintered Film Morphology.

Authors:  Satoshi Saita; Shin-Ichi Takeda; Hideya Kawasaki
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.719

5.  Liquid-Phase Exfoliation of Bismuth Telluride Iodide (BiTeI): Structural and Optical Properties of Single-/Few-Layer Flakes.

Authors:  Gabriele Bianca; Chiara Trovatello; Attilio Zilli; Marilena Isabella Zappia; Sebastiano Bellani; Nicola Curreli; Irene Conticello; Joka Buha; Marco Piccinni; Michele Ghini; Michele Celebrano; Marco Finazzi; Ilka Kriegel; Nikolas Antonatos; Zdeněk Sofer; Francesco Bonaccorso
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 10.383

6.  Design of Nonideal Eutectic Mixtures Based on Correlations with Molecular Properties.

Authors:  Laura J B M Kollau; Remco Tuinier; Job Verhaak; Jaap den Doelder; Ivo A W Filot; Mark Vis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.991

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.