Literature DB >> 31545883

American Society for Bone and Mineral Research-Orthopaedic Research Society Joint Task Force Report on Cell-Based Therapies.

Regis J O'Keefe1, Rocky S Tuan2, Nancy E Lane3, Hani A Awad4, Frank Barry5, Bruce A Bunnell6, Céline Colnot7, Matthew T Drake8, Hicham Drissi9, Nathaniel A Dyment10, Lisa A Fortier11, Robert E Guldberg12, Rita Kandel13, David G Little14, Mary F Marshall15, Jeremy J Mao16, Norimasa Nakamura17, Benedikt L Proffen18, Scott A Rodeo19, Vicki Rosen20, Stavros Thomopoulos21, Edward M Schwarz22, Rosa Serra23.   

Abstract

Cell-based therapies, defined here as the delivery of cells in vivo to treat disease, have recently gained increasing public attention as a potentially promising approach to restore structure and function to musculoskeletal tissues. Although cell-based therapy has the potential to improve the treatment of disorders of the musculoskeletal system, there is also the possibility of misuse and misrepresentation of the efficacy of such treatments. The medical literature contains anecdotal reports and research studies, along with web-based marketing and patient testimonials supporting cell-based therapy. Both the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) are committed to ensuring that the potential of cell-based therapies is realized through rigorous, reproducible, and clinically meaningful scientific discovery. The two organizations convened a multidisciplinary and international Task Force composed of physicians, surgeons, and scientists who are recognized experts in the development and use of cell-based therapies. The Task Force was charged with defining the state-of-the art in cell-based therapies and identifying the gaps in knowledge and methodologies that should guide the research agenda. The efforts of this Task Force are designed to provide researchers and clinicians with a better understanding of the current state of the science and research needed to advance the study and use of cell-based therapies for skeletal tissues. The design and implementation of rigorous, thorough protocols will be critical to leveraging these innovative treatments and optimizing clinical and functional patient outcomes. In addition to providing specific recommendations and ethical considerations for preclinical and clinical investigations, this report concludes with an outline to address knowledge gaps in how to determine the cell autonomous and nonautonomous effects of a donor population used for bone regeneration.
© 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANIMAL MODELS; CELL/TISSUE SIGNALING, TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CELLS OF BONE; CLINICAL TRIALS; GENETIC RESEARCH

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31545883     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  6 in total

1.  Role of Prx1-expressing skeletal cells and Prx1-expression in fracture repair.

Authors:  Alessandra Esposito; Lai Wang; Tieshi Li; Mariana Miranda; Anna Spagnoli
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Meniscal substitution, a developing and long-awaited demand.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Rafael A Buerba; Neha Shah; Stefano Zaffagnini; Peter Alexander; Volker Musahl
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2020-07-25

3.  Reiterative infusions of MSCs improve pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta eliciting a pro-osteogenic paracrine response: TERCELOI clinical trial.

Authors:  Arantza Infante; Blanca Gener; Miguel Vázquez; Nerea Olivares; Arantza Arrieta; Gema Grau; Isabel Llano; Luis Madero; Ana Maria Bueno; Belén Sagastizabal; Daniela Gerovska; Marcos J Araúzo-Bravo; Itziar Astigarraga; Clara I Rodríguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

4.  Qualifying Osteogenic Potency Assay Metrics for Human Multipotent Stromal Cells: TGF-β2 a Telling Eligible Biomarker.

Authors:  Augustin M Ofiteru; Diana F Becheru; Sami Gharbia; Cornel Balta; Hildegard Herman; Bianca Mladin; Mariana Ionita; Anca Hermenean; Jorge S Burns
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Protein Expression of AEBP1, MCM4, and FABP4 Differentiate Osteogenic, Adipogenic, and Mesenchymal Stromal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Thorben Sauer; Giulia Facchinetti; Michael Kohl; Justyna M Kowal; Svitlana Rozanova; Julia Horn; Hagen Schmal; Ivo Kwee; Arndt-Peter Schulz; Sonja Hartwig; Moustapha Kassem; Jens K Habermann; Timo Gemoll
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  FGFR3 in Periosteal Cells Drives Cartilage-to-Bone Transformation in Bone Repair.

Authors:  Anais Julien; Simon Perrin; Oriane Duchamp de Lageneste; Caroline Carvalho; Morad Bensidhoum; Laurence Legeai-Mallet; Céline Colnot
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 7.765

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.