Literature DB >> 31545375

Radiofrequency ablation lesions in low-, intermediate-, and normal-voltage myocardium: an in vivo study in a porcine heart model.

Bawer J Tofig1, Peter Lukac1, Jan M Nielsen1, Esben S S Hansen2, Rasmus S Tougaard1, Henrik K Jensen1, Jens C Nielsen1, Steen B Kristiansen1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Contact force (CF) between radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter and myocardium and ablation index (AI) correlates with RF lesion depth and width in normal-voltage (>1.5 mV) myocardium (NVM). We investigate the impact of CF on RF lesion depth and width in low (<0.5 mV) (LVM) and intermediate-voltage (0.5-1.5 mV) myocardium (IVM) following myocardial infarction. Correlation between RF lesion depth and width evaluated by native contrast magnetic resonance imaging (ncMRI) and gross anatomical evaluation was investigated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twelve weeks after myocardial infarction, 10 pigs underwent electroanatomical mapping and endocardial RF ablations were deployed in NVM, IVM, and LVM myocardium. In vivo ncMRI was performed before the heart was excised and subjected to gross anatomical evaluation. Ninety (82%) RF lesions were evaluated. Radiofrequency lesion depth and width were smaller in IVM and LVM compared with NVM (P < 0.001). Radiofrequency lesion depth and width correlated with CF, AI, and impedance drop in NVM (CF and AI P < 0.001) and IVM (CF and AI depths P < 0.001; CF and AI widths P < 0.05). Native contrast magnetic resonance imaging evaluated RF lesion depth and width correlated with gross anatomical depth and width (NVM and IVM P < 0.001; LVM P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency lesions deployed by similar duration, power and CF are smaller in IVM and LVM than in NVM. Radiofrequency lesion depth and width correlated with CF, AI, and impedance drop in NVM and IVM but not in LVM. Native contrast magnetic resonance imaging may be useful to assess RF lesion depth and width in NVM, IVM, and LVM. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation index; Contact force; Lesion size; Low-voltage myocardium; Magnetic resonance imaging; RF lesion depth and width; Scar; Ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31545375     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euz247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  5 in total

1.  Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nassir F Marrouche; Oussama Wazni; Christopher McGann; Tom Greene; J Michael Dean; Lilas Dagher; Eugene Kholmovski; Moussa Mansour; Francis Marchlinski; David Wilber; Gerhard Hindricks; Christian Mahnkopf; Darryl Wells; Pierre Jais; Prashanthan Sanders; Johannes Brachmann; Jeroen J Bax; Leonie Morrison-de Boer; Thomas Deneke; Hugh Calkins; Christian Sohns; Nazem Akoum
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 157.335

2.  Impact of local left atrial wall thickness on the incidence of acute pulmonary vein reconnection after Ablation Index-guided atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Mark J Mulder; Michiel J B Kemme; Amaya M D Hagen; Luuk H G A Hopman; Peter M van de Ven; Herbert A Hauer; Giovanni J M Tahapary; Marco J W Götte; Albert C van Rossum; Cornelis P Allaart
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-07-03

Review 3.  The challenge of optimising ablation lesions in catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Riccardo Proietti; Luca Lichelli; Nicolas Lellouche; Tarvinder Dhanjal
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-12-28

4.  How to leverage local impedance to guide effective ablation strategy: A case series.

Authors:  Francesco Solimene; Francesco Maddaluno; Maurizio Malacrida; Giuseppe Stabile
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-07

5.  Mirror mirror on the wall: Which is the best ablation index of all?

Authors:  Vivek Chaturvedi; Dhiraj Gupta
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.