OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation is often neglected in clinical practice guidelines, even when there is evidence for its effectiveness. The Current Rehabilitation development project, documented in this article, aimed to develop processes and structures to incorporate evidence and good practice on rehabilitation and functional capacity into the Finnish national Current Care Guidelines. DESIGN: Descriptive assessment. METHODS: The 3-year Current Rehabilitation development project was launched in 2012. It began with an assessment of existing rehabilitation evidence on the Current Care Guideline database and a query to Finnish rehabilitation experts. The project group developed and compiled tools for Current Care editors and guideline panels. The editorial team continued to monitor changes in rehabilitation evidence in the guidelines. RESULTS: During the years 2012-2014, a total of 54 guidelines were published, and rehabilitation was incorporated into 31 of them. The number of rehabilitation-related evidence summaries increased from 49 to 164. During the next 3 years an additional 41 guidelines were published. Rehabilitation was incorporated to 24 of them, and the number of rehabilitation-related evidence summaries increased from 78 to 136. CONCLUSION: The level of evidence criteria used for rehabilitative interventions were the same as for symptomatic or curative interventions. Evidence showing the effectiveness of rehabilitation increased substantially during the project.
OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation is often neglected in clinical practice guidelines, even when there is evidence for its effectiveness. The Current Rehabilitation development project, documented in this article, aimed to develop processes and structures to incorporate evidence and good practice on rehabilitation and functional capacity into the Finnish national Current Care Guidelines. DESIGN: Descriptive assessment. METHODS: The 3-year Current Rehabilitation development project was launched in 2012. It began with an assessment of existing rehabilitation evidence on the Current Care Guideline database and a query to Finnish rehabilitation experts. The project group developed and compiled tools for Current Care editors and guideline panels. The editorial team continued to monitor changes in rehabilitation evidence in the guidelines. RESULTS: During the years 2012-2014, a total of 54 guidelines were published, and rehabilitation was incorporated into 31 of them. The number of rehabilitation-related evidence summaries increased from 49 to 164. During the next 3 years an additional 41 guidelines were published. Rehabilitation was incorporated to 24 of them, and the number of rehabilitation-related evidence summaries increased from 78 to 136. CONCLUSION: The level of evidence criteria used for rehabilitative interventions were the same as for symptomatic or curative interventions. Evidence showing the effectiveness of rehabilitation increased substantially during the project.
Keywords:
clinical practice guidelines; evidence-based medicine; rehabilitation
Authors: Raúl PÉRez-Llanes; Elena Donoso-ÚBeda; Javier MeroÑO-Gallut; Jose Antonio Lopez-Pina; Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso Journal: J Rehabil Med Clin Commun Date: 2020-06-09
Authors: Jessica Pope Mitro; J Mary Louise Pomeroy; Sarah Osman; Virina Matta; Cindy Cai; Steven Garfinkel; Ali A Weinstein Journal: Rehabil Nurs Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: J Mary Louise Pomeroy; Jonathan O Sanchez; Cindy Cai; Steven Garfinkel; Pierre Côté; Walter R Frontera; Lynn H Gerber Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 3.412