Literature DB >> 31544467

Proposed new diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine.

Mona Ameri Chalmer1, Thomas Folkmann Hansen1, Elena R Lebedeva2, David W Dodick3, Richard B Lipton4,5, Jes Olesen1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: ICHD-3 criteria for chronic migraine (CM) include a mixture of migraine and tension-type-like headaches and do not account for patients who have a high frequency of migraine but no other headaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from the Danish Headache Center and their relatives with ICHD-3 defined CM were compared with patients with high frequency episodic migraine (HFEM). Danish registries were used to compare the socioeconomic impact in these two groups. A Russian student population was used to determine the generalizability of the number of patients fulfilling CM and the proposed diagnostic criteria for CM.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the demographic profile between the two groups in the Danish cohort. The number of lifelong or annual attacks (p > 0.3), comorbid diseases, or self-reported effect of triptans (p = 1) did not differ. HFEM patients purchased more triptans than CM patients (p = 0.01). CM patients received more early pension (p = 0.00135) but did not differ from HFEM patients with regard to sickness benefit (p = 0.207), cash assistance (p = 0.139), or rehabilitation benefit (p = 1). DISCUSSION: Patients with HFEM are comparable to CM patients with regard to chronicity and disability. We therefore suggest classifying CM as ≥ 8 migraine days per month (proposed CM), disregarding the need for ≥ 15 headache days per month. The proposed diagnostic criteria for CM approximately doubled the number of patients with CM in both the Danish and the Russian materials. Extending the definition of CM to include patients with HFEM will ensure that patients with significant disease burden and unmet treatment needs are identified and provided appropriate access to the range of treatment options and resources available to those with CM.
CONCLUSION: Patients with migraine on eight or more days but not 15 days with headache a month are as disabled as patients with ICHD-3 defined CM. They should be included in revised diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Migraine; chronic migraine; classification; diagnostic criteria; headache; high frequency episodic migraine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31544467     DOI: 10.1177/0333102419877171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cephalalgia        ISSN: 0333-1024            Impact factor:   6.292


  11 in total

Review 1.  Neurobiology of migraine progression.

Authors:  Wanakorn Rattanawong; Alan Rapoport; Anan Srikiatkhachorn
Journal:  Neurobiol Pain       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Low adherence to the guideline for the acute treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Thomas Folkmann Hansen; Mona Ameri Chalmer; Astrid Olesen; Henrik Winther Schytz; Sisse Rye Ostrowski; Mie Topholm; Kaspar Nielsen; Christian Erikstrup; Susan Mikkelsen; Ole Birger Pedersen; Jes Olesen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Recognition and clinical implications of high prevalence of migraine in patients with Brugada syndrome and drug-induced type 1 Brugada pattern.

Authors:  Can Hasdemir; Figen Gokcay; Mehmet N Orman; Umut Kocabas; Serdar Payzin; Hatice Sahin; Dale R Nyholt; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10-23

4.  Patient-Reported Outcome in Two Chronic Diseases: A Comparison of Quality of Life and Response Profiles in Severe Migraine and Severe Asthma.

Authors:  Christian Lucas; Samia Aly; Chantal Touboul; Rahma Sellami; Xavier Guillaume; Gilles Garcia
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2020-02-07

5.  Burden of migraine in Finland: multimorbidity and phenotypic disease networks in occupational healthcare.

Authors:  Minna A Korolainen; Samuli Tuominen; Samu Kurki; Mariann I Lassenius; Iiro Toppila; Timo Purmonen; Jaana Santaholma; Markku Nissilä
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Migraine Outcome Should Not Be Used to Determine Diagnosis, Severity, and Therapy: Moving Towards a Multiparametric Definition of Chronicity.

Authors:  Alberto Raggi; Matilde Leonardi; Simona Sacco; Paolo Martelletti
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-03-29

7.  Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab: Results From 64 Weeks of the LIBERTY Study.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Uwe Reuter; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima; Peggy Hours-Zesiger; Chrystel Fernandes; Shihua Wen; Nadia Tenenbaum; Aditi Kataria; Michel D Ferrari; Jan Klatt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Sustained response to onabotulinumtoxin A in patients with chronic migraine: real-life data.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Simona Guerzoni; Carlo Baraldi; Luana Evangelista; Ilaria Frattale; Carmine Marini; Cindy Tiseo; Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 7.277

9.  My Migraine Voice survey: disease impact on healthcare resource utilization, personal and working life in Finland.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Sumelahti; Markku Sumanen; Merika S Sumanen; Samuli Tuominen; Johanna Vikkula; Sanna M Honkala; Stina Rosqvist; Minna A Korolainen
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  Erenumab for Migraine Prevention in a 1-Year Compassionate Use Program: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Differences Between Clinical Phenotypes.

Authors:  Jean Schoenen; Gregory Timmermans; Romain Nonis; Maïté Manise; Arnaud Fumal; Pascale Gérard
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.