Qian Cao1, Baris Kumru1, Markus Antonietti1, Bernhard V K J Schmidt1,2. 1. Department of Colloid Chemistry, Max-Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. 2. School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
Abstract
Metal-free graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) has attracted significant attention recently due to its multiple applications, such as photocatalysis, energy storage and conversion, and biomaterials, albeit formation of g-CN films is challenging. Herein, a "grafting to" route to graft polymer brushes onto g-CN via visible-light irradiation is described. Afterward, g-CN/polymer films can be obtained through spin coating on glass substrates. As such, the present material provides an improved process toward further application of g-CN in thin films. Moreover, an improved dispersibility in organic solvent was realized after grafting and functional groups (such as epoxides) were introduced to g-CN. Subsequently, the epoxy groups were utilized for further functionalization to adjust the surface polarity.
Metal-free graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) has attracted significant attention recently due to its multiple applications, such as photocatalysis, energy storage and conversion, and biomaterials, albeit formation of g-CN films is challenging. Herein, a "grafting to" route to graft polymer brushes onto g-CN via visible-light irradiation is described. Afterward, g-CN/polymer films can be obtained through spin coating on glass substrates. As such, the present material provides an improved process toward further application of g-CN in thin films. Moreover, an improved dispersibility in organic solvent was realized after grafting and functional groups (such as epoxides) were introduced to g-CN. Subsequently, the epoxy groups were utilized for further functionalization to adjust the surface polarity.
Recently, metal-free
graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN) has been widely
investigated,[1] due to its promising properties
for many applications.[2,3] It consists of repeating tri-s-triazine rings and features a band gap of about 2.7 eV
absorbing visible light. Generally studied as a heterogeneous photocatalyst,
g-CNcan be used in water splitting,[4−6] CO2 reduction,[3,7] and pollution photodegradation.[8−10] The unique optical properties
such as photoluminescence[11−13] and biocompatibility[14] make g-CN an ideal candidate for bioimaging[15,16] and biomedical[17] applications. Recently,
two-dimensional g-CN films have been frequently studied[18] and have broad applications in solar cells,[19] ionic devices,[20] and
sensing.[21] In the past, various approaches
targeted for the fabrication of g-CN films via chemical vapor deposition
(CVD),[22] thermal vapor condensation,[23] or magnetron sputtering[24] were investigated, during which g-CN directly grows from the substrate
under suitable conditions, and usually uniform films can be obtained
after these processes. For example, Xu et al. fabricated continuous
polymericCN thin films for solar cell application,[19] and Xiao et al. used CVD-fabricated CN for ion transport.[20] However, problems such as being costly, complicated
processing, and high time requirements are disadvantages of these
technologies. Solution processing would be an useful method for film
formation, albeit the weak dispersibility of g-CN in most solvents
caused by strong van der Waals attractions is the main problem for
the solution approach. Hence, it is challenging to employ solution-based
common methods, like spin coating[25] or
drop casting[26] to form uniform g-CN films.
Moreover, g-CN shows limited selectivity toward CO2 photoreduction
because of unfavorable surface properties, which require further modification.[27,28]In general, several strategies were attempted to improve the
physiochemical
properties of g-CN, such as doping,[29] morphology
changing,[2] precursor functionalization,[30] copolymerization,[31] and surface grafting.[32,33] For example, Xu et
al. grafted n-bromobutane onto mesoporous CN for
heterogeneous catalysis.[34] Bu et al. modified
g-CN with hydroxylamine groups by treating with oxygen plasma, thus
forming g-CN with excellent hydrophilicity.[35] Very recently, our group investigated the photoinitiated
surface modification of g-CN, e.g., to introduce hydrophilic or hydrophobic
moieties.[36,37] In this process, g-CN promoted radical formation
under visible-light irradiation that was utilized to initiate polymerizations[38,39] or hydrogel formation as well.[40,41] Among the
modification of g-CN, polymers obtained more and more attraction,
due to their versatile properties (e.g., flexibility, easy functionalization,
and affordability).[42] For example, poly(glycidyl
methacrylate) (PGMA) is widely utilized because of the epoxy group
that can be easily functionalized in different ways, e.g., Abedul
and co-workers employed PGMA as a tunable platform to modify microfluidic
devices.[43] Usually utilized as an economical
alternative to polycarbonate, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) possesses
moderate properties of easy handling and processing, while poly(isobornyl
acrylate) (PIBA) is commonly applied on microfluidic devices[44] due to the properties of inertness and transparency.
Thus, the surface properties of g-CN might be facilely adjusted by
functionalized polymers while preserving its inherent catalytic features.However, to the best of our knowledge, grafting polymer brushes
onto g-CN has not been reported before, which in turn might lead to
an improvement of interface properties of g-CN. Polymer brushes are
surface coatings that consist of polymers tethered to a substrate,
which can be realized by physisorption or covalent attachment. There
are two ways for the covalent attachment, one is “grafting
from”, where a controlled polymerization[45] is performed and the polymerchains grow via monomer propagation
on the surface. Another approach is grafting to; in this process,
an end-functionalized polymer is reacted with a substrate surface.
Several factors have an effect on the final grafting density, such
as polymer molecular weight, surface coverage, solvent quality, and
steric hindrance.[46−48] Grafting of polymer brushes is commonly used for
fabrication of hybrid structures,[49] where
polymers are tethered on a substrate, e.g., inorganic materials such
as silicon, gold, hexagonal boron nitride, or silica,[50−52] so that organic–inorganic films can be patterned as well,
which can be applied for biotechnology,[53] microelectronics,[54,55] microreaction vessels,[56] and electrical devices.[57] In this perspective, g-CN as a functional material might be an ideal
option for polymer grafting, and a combination of polymer with g-CN
might simplify the process for g-CN utilization in various applications.In the present work, the grafting to method is utilized to graft
ene-functional polymers onto g-CN. Ene-functional polymers with different
side groups, such as PMMA, PGMA, and PIBA were synthesized by atom
transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and ene-modified initiator
10-undecenyl 2-bromopropionate (Un-EBrP) was used during polymerization,
as depicted in Scheme . The very common and affordable CM (formed from cyanuric acid and
melamine as precursors) was utilized as the substrate. Due to the
formation of surface radicals under visible light, the CM surface
was employed for grafting. The polymer-grafted CM (polymer/CM) was
characterized via elemental analysis (EA), thermal gravimetric analysis
(TGA), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Afterward,
polymer/CM film materials can be facilely obtained via spin coating
and analyzed with an atomic force microscope (AFM) and a scanning
electron microscope (SEM). Moreover, PGMA-grafted CM can be utilized
to tune the material via further modification. Surface properties
after modification was subsequently determined by contact angle and
SEM–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM–EDX).
Scheme 1
Overview of Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization and Grafting of
Polymer Brushes onto g-CN under Visible-Light Irradiation
Experimental
Section
Materials
Acetic acid (glacial, ≥99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich),
Al2O3 basic (Sigma-Aldrich), 2-bromopropionyl
bromide (98%, Sigma-Aldrich), cyanuric acid (98%, Sigma-Aldrich),
deuterated chloroform (CDCl3, 99.96%, Sigma-Aldrich), ethanol
(absolute, 95%, Sigma-Aldrich), ethyl acetate (99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich),
hexane (95%, Sigma-Aldrich), melamine (99%, Sigma-Aldrich), ethyl
2-bromopropionate (EBrP, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich), pyridine (99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich), N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine
(PMDETA, ≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich), 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol
(pFDe, ≥97%, Sigma-Aldrich), sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate
(MESNA, ≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich), tetrahydrofuran (THF, ≥99.9%,
inhibitor-free, Sigma-Aldrich), silica gel (for column chromatography,
Sigma-Aldrich), methanol (≥99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich), hydrochloric
acid (HCl, 37%, Sigma-Aldrich), and 10-undecen-1-ol (98%, Sigma-Aldrich)
were used as received. Copper(I) bromide (Cu(I)Br, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich)
was purified by stirring in glacial acetic acid overnight, filtered,
and washed with absolute ethanol. Isobornyl acrylate (IBA, 98.5%,
Sigma-Aldrich), glycidyl methacrylate (GMA, 97%, Sigma-Aldrich), and
methyl methacrylate (MMA, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich) were passed through
a basicaluminacolumn prior to use. 50 W Light-emitting diode (LED)
chips (Foxpic High Power 50 W LED Chip Bulb Light DIY White 3800LM
6500 K) were connected to a self-made circuit and cooling system.
Sonication was performed in a sonication bath from Elma (Transsonic
T310). The initiator 10-undecenyl 2-bromopropionate (Un-EBrP) was
synthesized following the work of Matyjaszewski and co-workers,[58] and the utilized g-CN (CM) was synthesized from
the cyanuric acid–melaminecomplex according to the literature.[59]
ATRP Employing Un-EBrP as an Initiator
General
Procedure
Cu(I)Br was added to a 25 mL round
bottom flask in an ice bath, and the flask was sealed with a rubber
septum and flushed with argon for 30 min. Subsequently, deoxygenated
monomers and deoxygenated PMDETA were added via a syringe. After Cu(I)Br/PMDETAcomplex formation, the solution turned light green and the initiator
Un-EBrP was added via a syringe, the ice bath was removed and the
mixture was stirred at the noted temperature and time. Subsequently,
the flask was removed from the oil bath and a sample of the raw products
was subjected to 1H NMR for calculation of monomer conversion.
The reaction mixture was diluted in THF and passed through an aluminum
oxide column to remove the oxidized catalyst. The polymer was purified
by precipitation into methanol, filtered, dried, and finally the polymer
was obtained as a white solid. Reference polymerizations with EBrP
were performed in the same way.
Polymerization of MMA
PMMA was obtained according to
the general procedure with the following equivalents: MMA (3.76 g,
0.0376 mol, 376 equiv), Cu(I)Br (7.5 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.5 equiv), PMDETA
(8.6 mg, 0.05 mmol, 0.5 equiv), and Un-EBrP (32 mg, 0.1 mmol, 1 equiv).
The reaction was carried out at 45 °C for 30 min (conversion
= 65%). (Mn,SEC = 21.5 kg/mol, Đ = 1.21.)
Polymerization of GMA
PGMA was obtained according to
the general procedure with the following equivalents: GMA (5.4 g,
0.04 mol, 200 equiv), Cu(I)Br (0.15 mg, 0.1 mmol, 0.5 equiv), PMDETA
(17 mg, 0.1 mmol, 0.5 equiv), and Un-EBrP (64 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv).
The reaction was carried out at 25 °C for 25 min (conversion
= 33%). (Mn,SEC = 25.9 kg/mol, Đ = 1.75.)
Polymerization of IBA
PIBA was obtained according to
the general procedure with the following equivalents: IBA (6.23 g,
0.03 mol, 150 equiv), Cu(I)Br (30 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), PMDETA (34
mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv), and Un-EBrP (64 mg, 0.2 mol, 1 equiv). The
reaction was carried out at 65 °C for 90 min (conversion = 96%).
(Mn,SEC = 21.3 kg/mol, Đ = 1.41.)
Grafting Polymer Brushes onto g-CN (Polymer/CM)
CM
(30 mg) and 15 mL of THF were mixed in a round bottom flask and sonicated
for 1 h to yield a CM dispersion. Afterward, 300 mg of the related
polymer (PMMA, PGMA, or PIBA) were added to the CM dispersion; the
flask was sealed with a rubber septum and flushed with argon for 30
min. The mixture was put between two 50 W LED daylight sources (20
cm distance between light sources) to initiate the grafting. After
2 days, the mixture was washed two times with THF and dried under
vacuum.The control samples were prepared by the same process
but treated only with stirring for 2 days without light irradiation.The study of the CM/PMMA weight ratio was performed with 75, 150,
200, and 300 mg of PMMA and CM (30 mg), respectively.
Preparation
of the Films
Polymer/CM films were prepared
via spin coating. At first, 4 mg of the as-prepared PIBA/CM was dispersed
in 1 mL of THF to obtain a PIBA/CM dispersion. Glass slides were used
as substrates. The initially stationary glass was flooded with PIBA/CM
solution until the entire surface was covered, then accelerated to
the desired rotation rate. Acceleration times were 10 s, total spin
times were 60 s, and the spin speed was 3000 rpm. Afterward, the glass
slides were placed under vacuum at ambient temperature for 2 h to
obtain the final dry films.
Modification of PGMA/CM
MESNA–PGMA/CM
In a 15 mL glass vial, 2 mL of
THF, 5 mg of PGMA/CM, and 50 mg of MESNA were mixed and cooled with
an ice bath. Then, 3 mg of LiOH was added slowly, the cooling was
removed, and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at ambient
temperature for 3 h. Afterward, the mixture was diluted with 2 mL
of H2O three times and centrifuged. The precipitate was
dried under vacuum, and finally, 4.5 mg of dry products were obtained.
pFDe–PGMA/CM
In a 15 mL glass vial, 2 mL of
THF, 7 mg of PGMA/CM, and 300 μL of pFDe were mixed and cooled
with an ice bath. Then, 3 mg of LiOH was added slowly, the cooling
was removed, and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at ambient
temperature for 1 h. Afterward, the mixture was diluted with 3 mL
of THF three times and centrifuged. The precipitate was dried under
vacuum, and finally, 5 mg of dry products were obtained.As
a reference, PMMA/CM was utilized together with pFDe and MESNA in
the same process as with PGMA/CM.
Characterization
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR)
spectra were measured on a Nicolet iS 5FT-IR spectrometer. Elemental
analysis (EA) for measuring the polymer/CM sample was recorded via
a Vario Micro device. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried
out from ambient temperature to 1000 °C at a heating rate of
10 °C/min using a thermos microbalance TG 209 F1 Libra (Netzsch,
Selb, Germany) in an air atmosphere, and data was recorded and analyzed
by the Proteus (6.1.0) software package. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance
(1H NMR) and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR) spectra were recorded at ambient temperature on a Bruker Ascend
400. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) for PGMA, PIBA, and PMMA
was conducted in THF with toluene as an internal standard using PSS
1260-Iso as a pump, a column system of PSS SDV column (8 × 300
mm2) with a PSS SDV precolumn (8 × 50 mm2), PSS-SECcurity-VWD, and PSS-SECcurity-RID as detectors and a calibration
with PMMA standards from PSS. The theoretical number-averaged molecular
weight was calculated according to the equation (Mn,theo = [monomer]0/[I]0 ×
conversion × Mmonomer). Scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using JSM-7500F (JEOL) equipped
with an Oxford Instruments X-MAX 80 mm2 detector for imaging
of the film. The SEM–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)
measurements were conducted by using a JEOL JED-2300 detector in a
JEOL JSM-5600 at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Atomic force microscopy
(AFM) was performed with a Nanoscope IIIa Scanning Probe Microscope
Controller and NanoWorld Arrow-NCR probes from Digital Instruments.
The size of polymer-grafted g-CN was determined by a Zeta Nanosizer
instrument (Malvern Instruments, U.K.) at a fixed scattering angle
of 90°. All measurements were repeated at least three times.
The three-phase contact angle of the polymer-grafted g-CN films was
recorded by sessile drop analysis (OCA instrument, Dataphysics ES,
Germany); the polymer-grafted g-CN was placed at the bottom of the
stage, and about 2 μL of water droplet was placed gently on
the sample, and three different spots on the film were measured. X-ray
diffraction (XRD) patterns of polymer/CM and CM powders were obtained
using a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer via Cu Kα radiation.
Solid state ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectra of
polymer/CM and CM were recorded via a Cary 500 Scan spectrophotometer
equipped with an integrating sphere.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
of Ene-Functionalized Polymer
To obtain ene
end-functionalized polymers for g-CN modification, a double-bond-functionalized
initiator Un-EBrP was prepared following the work of Matyjaszewski
and co-workers,[58] which was used for atom
transfer reaction polymerization (ATRP) with Cu(I)Br as the catalyst
and PMDETA as the ligand. 1H NMR and 13C NMR
(Figure S1) characterized the successful
synthesis of Un-EBrP, with signals from the double bond at about 5
ppm. Three different monomers, namely MMA, IBA, and GMA, were used
in the polymerization. The obtained polymers, PMMA, PIBA, and PGMA
were characterized via SEC (Table ). According to PMMAcalibration, Mn,SEC values of 21.3 kg/mol for PIBA, 25.9 kg/mol for
PGMA, and 21.5 kg/mol for PMMA were obtained, which indicates the
successful polymerization of PGMA, PIBA, and PMMA, with Un-EBrP as
an initiator. Unimodal molecular mass distributions were obtained
(Figure S2), yet the ene-functionalized
polymers show relatively broad molecular mass distributions with Đ of 1.41 for PIBA, 1.75 for PGMA, and 1.21 for PMMA.
The reason might be chain transfer events during the polymerization,
although test polymerizations with EBrP led to similar results (Table S1). In addition, the obtained molecular
masses were in reasonable agreement with Mn,theo. Moreover, the double-bond incorporation was confirmed via 1H NMR (Figure ) as the signals from the ene end-group can be found around 5 ppm.
Table 1
SEC Results for Ene-Functionalized
Polymers Obtained via ATRP
ene-polymer
monomer/initiator
aconversion
(%)
bMn,theo (kg/mol)
cMn,SEC(kg/mol)
dĐ
PGMA
200:1
33
16
25.9
1.75
PIBA
150:1
96
29
21.3
1.41
PMMA
376:1
65
24
21.5
1.21
Calculated via 1H NMR.
Calculated according to the Experimental
Section.
Determined
via SEC in THF based
on PMMA calibration.
Đ = Mw/Mn.
Figure 1
1H NMR of ene end-functionalized PGMA (a), PIBA (b),
and PMMA (c) (peak a corresponds to CHCl3 and peak b to
water).
1H NMR of ene end-functionalized PGMA (a), PIBA (b),
and PMMA (c) (peak a corresponds to CHCl3 and peak b to
water).Calculated via 1H NMR.Calculated according to the Experimental
Section.Determined
via SEC in THF based
on PMMAcalibration.Đ = Mw/Mn.
Ene-Polymer-Grafted
CM
After synthesis of ene-functionalized
polymers, grafting of CM was attempted. CM is readily producing radicals
under visible-light irradiation, which can be exploited for photoinitiation.
Thus, the double bond at the end of the polymercan be effectively
attacked by those radicals and grafting proceeds as expected from
the literature-known reactivity of g-CN and ene-functional molecules.[38,60] By these means, functional polymer brushes onto CM were installed.
Bulk CM was dispersed in THF and sonicated in advance to increase
the accessibility of CM sheet structures (Figure S3a). Afterward, the as-prepared ene-polymersPMMA, PIBA, and
PGMA were added, respectively. Irradiation with visible lights led
to radical formation. Thus, polymerscan be introduced to CM via radical
addition, namely PIBA/CM (Figure S3b),
PGMA/CM (Figure S3c), and PMMA/CM (Figure S3d). The grafting was followed by FT-IR
spectroscopy (Figure a). Compared to CM precursor spectra, PIBA/CM, PGMA/CM, and PMMA/CM
IR spectra show an additional peak originating from C=O stretching
at about 1730 cm–1, which corresponds to the carbonyl
group in the methacrylicpolymers. Moreover, the corresponding ene-polymer
FT-IR spectra with a direct comparison (Figure S4), indicated the grafting of PIBA, PGMA, and PMMA on CM,
respectively. Subsequently, elemental analysis (Figure b) results showed a significant increase
of the C/N ratio compared to the CM precursor, whereas CM only had
a C/N ratio of 0.57, a change up to 1.88 (PIBA/CM), 1.00 (PGMA/CM),
and 3.75 (PMMA/CM) was observed after grafting (Table S2), demonstrating successful ene-polymer grafting.
Notably, only minor changes were observed for the reference samples,
which were prepared via the same process without light irradiation,
i.e., C/N ratios of 0.61 (ref PIBA/CM), 0.71 (ref PGMA/CM), and 0.61
(ref PMMA/CM) were observed. Hence, it can be confirmed that only
slight physical attachment was present during mixing of polymers and
CM, while a chemical bond was formed under visible-light irradiation.
Figure 2
(a) FT-IR
spectra of the CM precursor and ene-polymer-grafted CM.
(b) C/N ratio of the CM precursor and ene-polymer-grafted CM obtained
via elemental analysis. (c) TGA of the CM precursor and ene-polymer-grafted
CM. (d) Photographs of PGMA/CM dispersed in THF over 2 days.
(a) FT-IR
spectra of the CM precursor and ene-polymer-grafted CM.
(b) C/N ratio of the CM precursor and ene-polymer-grafted CM obtained
via elemental analysis. (c) TGA of the CM precursor and ene-polymer-grafted
CM. (d) Photographs of PGMA/CM dispersed in THF over 2 days.The amount of grafted polymers
differs for the respective polymers,
and thus thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Figure c) was performed. The weight loss of polymers
was analyzed during heating: 18.3% weight loss of PIBA/CM on heating
at 220–300 °C, 23.4% loss of weight of PGMA/CM on heating
at 250–380 °C, and 53.3% loss of weight of PMMA/CM on
heating at 260–400 °C, respectively. Afterward, the amount
of grafted ene-polymer grafting was calculated[61] as shown specifically in Table S3. Therefore, a CM unit is defined consisting of seven nitrogen atoms
and six carbon atoms. According to this calculation, PIBA- and PGMA-grafted
CM show almost the same grafting density of 1 polymerchain grafted
per 526 CM units (1.11 × 10–2 mmol/g) and 500
CM units (1.18 × 10–2 mmol/g), respectively.
On the other hand, PMMA/CM shows a significantly higher grafting density
of 4.46 × 10–2 mmol/g, meaning 1 PMMAchain
per 132 units of CM. Demonstrating that even with almost the same
molecular weight, a difference of the grafting density from different
polymers is obtained. In the literature, it was stated that the cross-sectional
area of a polymerchain with a similar Mn and in good solvent is around 170 Å2,[62] which might be larger than the spaces between
active species on the g-CN surface. Hence, only a limited amount of
active radicals are utilized in the grafting to process. Moreover,
steric hindrance differs according to the polymer sidechains, as PGMA
with an epoxide group and PIBA with a cycloalkyl group cause larger
steric hindrance than PMMA (only with methyl and methylcarboxylate
groups), which also might result in higher PMMA grafting density.To further elucidate the grafting process, utilization of different
mass ratios of CM to PMMA was attempted (Figures S5 and S6). With a certain amount of CM (30 mg), simply adjusting
the PMMA from 75 to 300 mg, an increased weight loss of PMMA with
thermal treatment and increased C/N ratio from elemental analysis
were found. Thus, it is indicated that with the introduction of increased
amounts of PMMA, increased numbers of surface active species were
utilized for grafting. In such a way, it can be concluded that the
active sites on the surface are not saturated employing the initial
ratios of PMMA and CM. Moreover, XRD (Figure S7a) and ultraviolet absorption spectrum (Figure S7b) show no significant changes compared to CM after grafting,
which indicated that the inherent structural and absorption properties
of CM were still preserved enabling further applications of the grafted
materials.
Dispersibility and Film Fabrication
Commonly, g-CN
has poor dispersibility, which limits its application, for example
in solvent processing. Thus, further deposition is restricted, e.g.,
spin coating results in complicated processing for further applications
as film materials, e.g., solar cells, fuel cells and organic light-emitting
diodes. Therefore, the dispersibility of ene-polymer-grafted CM in
organic media was investigated. As an example, PIBA/CM was dispersed
in THF (Figures d
and S8) over 2 days and chloroform (Figure S9) over 20 h, respectively, and only
minor sedimentation was found. In comparison, the CM precursor does
not form a stable dispersion at all, which confirms an improved stability
of polymer/CM dispersions in organic solvent. Furthermore, dynamic
light scattering (Table S4) in THF shows
a significant decrease of CM hydrodynamic diameters after grafting,
because CM is a sheetlike structure, and during the visible-light-inducing
process, repelling force, and steric hindrance between two polymerchains causing the exfoliation of the CM layer structure, thus resulting
in a smaller size after grafting.Subsequently, the polymer-brush-grafted
CM was utilized to form films via the solution-based deposition method
of spin coating, e.g., a PIBA/CM film on a glass substrate was demonstrated
(Figure a). A transparent
film was obtained and compared to opaque CM films (Figure S10a), without an obvious change of the UV–vis
absorption (Figure S11). The structure
of the PIBA/CM film was characterized by scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) images (Figure b,c), and a smooth thin film structure was
confirmed, with a surface roughness of 1.49 nm (Figure S12). Besides, with the same condition for spin coating
of CM precursors, no clear film structure was found via AFM investigation
(Figure S10b,c). On the one hand, improved
dispersibility in organic solvent promoted better film formation.
On the other hand, PIBA possesses excellent adhesion[63] and film-forming properties, which has been recognized
as a commercial coating material,[64] as
accelerated film formation contributes to a better film structure.
The thickness of the PIBA/CM film was characterized via section analysis
(Figure d,e). The
corresponding micrograph indicates a thickness of the PIBA/CM film
of approximately 62 nm, and the thickness of the CM film (Figure S13) was approximately 20 nm. Thus, the
difference in thickness between PIBA/CM and CM might be the thickness
of polymer brushes as a rough assumption. Moreover, PIBAcan be used
as a polymer dielectric, and such thickness of thin films is appropriate
for the electric gate function.[65] As mentioned
before, the structural and absorption properties of CM were still
preserved after grafting. Hence, an improved process toward g-CN utilization
as an energy conversion device, solar cell, and other film materials
is provided.
Figure 3
(a) Digital picture of the PIBA/CM film after spin coating
on a
glass substrate. (b) SEM image of the PIBA/CM film after spin coating.
(c)–(e) show the AFM profile of spin-coated PIBA/CM film, thickness,
and thickness distribution with three lines in detail, respectively.
(a) Digital picture of the PIBA/CM film after spin coating
on a
glass substrate. (b) SEM image of the PIBA/CM film after spin coating.
(c)–(e) show the AFM profile of spin-coated PIBA/CM film, thickness,
and thickness distribution with three lines in detail, respectively.
PGMA/CM Surface Modification
In addition to the facile
formation of thin films via spin coating, the functional groups such
as epoxides in PGMAcan be utilized for further modification. Hence,
the surface properties of PGMA/CM brush materials can be readily adjusted.
As a proof of concept, the thiol–epoxy addition reaction of
PGMA/CM with sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (MESNA) and perfluorodecanethiol
(pFDe) was attempted, respectively. The functionalization was carried
out following the work of De and Khan,[66] using LiOH as a catalyst at ambient temperature and reaction for
3 and 1 h, respectively (Figure a). The obtained MESNA–PGMA/CM and pFDe–PGMA/CM
materials were characterized via several methods, e.g., FT-IR (Figure S14a). For example, compared to reference
experiments with PMMA/CM (Figure S14b),
C–F stretch and S=O stretch bands were found from the
related FT-IR spectra, respectively. As MESNA is more hydrophilic
and pFDe is more hydrophobic, PGMA/CM films (Figures S15 and S16) with opposite polarity were obtained (Figure b). The surface properties
were characterized via contact angle measurements (Figures c and S17). MESNA–PGMA/CM was highly hydrophilic (contact
angle 32°), and pFDe–PGMA/CM showed a highly hydrophobic
property (contact angle 120°), whereas PGMA/CM showed a relatively
hydrophilic property with a contact angle of 75° as expected.
Further investigation was performed by SEM (Figure S18a,b), which showed no change in morphology after modification.
Moreover, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) (Figure S18c,d) indicated the appearance of C, N, O, Na, and S throughout
the surface of MESNA–PGMA/CM and C, N, O, F, and S throughout
the surface of pFDe–PGMA/CM, indicating successful functionalization.
Figure 4
(a) Modification
of PGMA/CM via thiol-addition-mediated epoxy ring-opening.
(b) Illustration of PGMA/CM modified with sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate
(a, MESNA) and 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol (b, pFDe), respectively.
(c) Contact angle of MESNA–PGMA/CM, PGMA/CM, and pFDe–PGMA/CM
from left to right, respectively.
(a) Modification
of PGMA/CM via thiol-addition-mediated epoxy ring-opening.
(b) Illustration of PGMA/CM modified with sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate
(a, MESNA) and 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecanethiol (b, pFDe), respectively.
(c) Contact angle of MESNA–PGMA/CM, PGMA/CM, and pFDe–PGMA/CM
from left to right, respectively.
Conclusions
In conclusion, a grafting to method was
utilized to realize the
grafting of defined polymers on g-CN. Thus, polymer/g-CN hybrid materials
were fabricated. Functional polymers were prepared via ATRP from an
initiator with ene functionality, and visible light was used to perform
photoinduced grafting. Thus, functional polymers namely PIBA, PGMA,
and PMMA were grafted onto g-CN. However, varied grafting density
was observed for the different polymers probably due to different
steric hindrance. The as-prepared polymer/g-CN has improved dispersibility
in organic solvent, which simplifies the further processing toward
film fabrication. Compared to CM, PIBA/CM films on a glass substrate
were facilely obtained via the spin coating deposition method. Film
thicknesses in the range of 60 nm and surface roughness around 1.49
nm were observed, with a relatively smooth surface and ideal thickness
toward further application as film materials. Moreover, the epoxide
group of PGMA/CM was utilized for further modification. Thus, the
surface properties of PGMA/CM brush materials were readily adjusted
to be either hydrophilic or hydrophobic according to the attached
species. Overall, polymer-grafted g-CN provides a novel way for combination
of polymers with g-CN. On one hand, improvement of the process toward
g-CN utilization in film materials was achieved, as such materials
might be of interest for solar cells, electric devices, or photocatalysis.
On the other hand, g-CN-containing films with adjustable hydrophobicity
were provided, which might be a promising material for photocatalysis
with improved selectivity.
Authors: Ang Li; Qian Cao; Guangye Zhou; Bernhard V K J Schmidt; Wenjin Zhu; Xintong Yuan; Hailing Huo; Jinlong Gong; Markus Antonietti Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Cristina Pérez-Fernández; Pilar Valles; Elena González-Toril; Eva Mateo-Martí; José Luis de la Fuente; Marta Ruiz-Bermejo Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.329