Literature DB >> 31543421

Low Revision Rates at More Than 10 Years for Dual-Mobility Cups Cemented Into Cages in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Gary Sayac1, Thomas Neri2, Loïc Schneider3, Rémi Philippot2, Frédéric Farizon4, Bertrand Boyer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instability and aseptic loosening are the two main complications after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Dual-mobility (DM) cups were shown to counteract implant instability during rTHA. To our knowledge, no study evaluated the 10-year outcomes of rTHA using DM cups, cemented into a metal reinforcement ring, in cases of severe acetabular bone loss. We hypothesized that using a DM cup cemented into a metal ring is a reliable technique for rTHA at 10 years, with few revisions for acetabular loosening and/or instability.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 77 rTHA cases with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky ≥ 2C) treated exclusively with a DM cup (NOVAE STICK; Serf, Décines-Charpieu, France) cemented into a cage (Kerboull cross, Burch-Schneider, or ARM rings). Clinical scores and radiological assessments were performed preoperatively and at the last follow-up. The main endpoints were revision surgery for aseptic loosening or recurring dislocation.
RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 10.7 years [2.1-16.2], 3 patients were reoperated because of aseptic acetabular loosening (3.9%) at 9.6 years [7-12]. Seven patients (9.45%) dislocated their hip implant, only 1 suffered from chronic instability (1.3%). Cup survivorship was 96.1% at 10 years. No sign of progressive radiolucent lines were found and bone graft integration was satisfactory for 91% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: The use of a DM cup cemented into a metal ring during rTHA with complex acetabular bone loss was associated with low revision rates for either acetabular loosening or chronic instability at 10 years.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetabular loosening; cemented dual-mobility cup; instability; revision total hip arthroplasty; severe acetabular bone loss

Year:  2019        PMID: 31543421     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Direct Anterior Cup-Half Cage for Revision and Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Alex Lancaster; Emily Boes; Jeremy Gililland; Lucas Anderson
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Dual mobility cups for total hip arthroplasty: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Thomas Neri; Bertrand Boyer; Cécile Batailler; Antonio Klasan; Sebastien Lustig; Remi Philippot; Frederic Farizon
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-06-17

Review 3.  Revision surgery due to failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: current state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Dongxu Jin; Changqing Zhang; Youshui Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  What Is the Dislocation and Revision Rate of Dual-mobility Cups Used in Complex Revision THAs?

Authors:  Niklas Unter Ecker; Hakan Kocaoğlu; Akos Zahar; Carl Haasper; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Mid-term results of revision surgery using double-trabecular metal cups alone or combined with impaction bone grafting for complex acetabular defects.

Authors:  Xianghong Zhang; Zhihong Li; Wanchun Wang; Tang Liu; Weiqiu Peng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.